IEMU.L vs. CSUS.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

IEMU.L (iShares VII plc -iShares Core MSCI EMU UCITS ETF EUR (Acc)) and CSUS.L (iShares VII plc - iShares MSCI USA ETF USD Acc) are both exchange-traded funds - IEMU.L is a Europe Equities fund tracking the MSCI EMU NR EUR, while CSUS.L is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Russell 1000 TR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, IEMU.L returned 9.61%/yr vs 13.29%/yr for CSUS.L. A 0.63 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IEMU.L charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.33%/yr for CSUS.L.

Performance

IEMU.L vs. CSUS.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares VII plc -iShares Core MSCI EMU UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (IEMU.L) and iShares VII plc - iShares MSCI USA ETF USD Acc (CSUS.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IEMU.L achieves a 8.00% return, which is significantly lower than CSUS.L's 10.32% return.

IEMU.L

• 1D: 0.59%
• 1M: 0.86%
• YTD: 8.00%
• 6M: 10.61%
• 1Y: 19.54%
• 3Y*: 19.32%
• 5Y*: 9.61%
• 10Y*: —

CSUS.L

• 1D: 0.06%
• 1M: 3.43%
• YTD: 10.32%
• 6M: 10.63%
• 1Y: 27.13%
• 3Y*: 22.49%
• 5Y*: 13.29%
• 10Y*: 15.12%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IEMU.L vs. CSUS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
IEMU.L iShares VII plc -iShares Core MSCI EMU UCITS ETF EUR (Acc)	8.00%	39.99%	3.03%	24.18%	-17.17%	13.22%	7.98%	7.94%
CSUS.L iShares VII plc - iShares MSCI USA ETF USD Acc	10.32%	17.22%	25.83%	26.72%	-20.46%	28.02%	20.30%	8.73%

Correlation

The correlation between IEMU.L and CSUS.L is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.75
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.57
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.59
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 19, 2019	0.63

The correlation between IEMU.L and CSUS.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.57 (3 years) to 0.75 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

IEMU.L vs. CSUS.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	IEMU.L	CSUS.L
Financial Services	24.0%	11.6%
Industrials	21.0%	8.5%
Technology	15.9%	35.4%
Consumer Cyclical	8.4%	10.2%
Utilities	6.4%	2.3%
Healthcare	5.6%	8.6%
Consumer Defensive	5.6%	4.8%
Communication Services	4.3%	11.3%
Basic Materials	4.0%	1.8%
Energy	3.9%	3.6%
Real Estate	0.9%	1.9%

Return for Risk

IEMU.L vs. CSUS.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IEMU.L

IEMU.L Risk / Return Rank: 35
IEMU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 34
IEMU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 35
IEMU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 34
IEMU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
IEMU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 38

CSUS.L

CSUS.L Risk / Return Rank: 73
CSUS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 73
CSUS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
CSUS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 73
CSUS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 67
CSUS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 75

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IEMU.L vs. CSUS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares VII plc -iShares Core MSCI EMU UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (IEMU.L) and iShares VII plc - iShares MSCI USA ETF USD Acc (CSUS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	IEMU.L	CSUS.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.18	2.32	-1.14
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.80	3.39	-1.59
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.22	1.42	-0.20
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.63	3.30	-1.67
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.85	13.91	-8.07
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

IEMU.L vs. CSUS.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IEMU.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.18, which is lower than the CSUS.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IEMU.L and CSUS.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	IEMU.L	CSUS.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.18	2.32	-1.14
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.51	0.85	-0.35
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.98	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.56	1.12	-0.56

Drawdowns

IEMU.L vs. CSUS.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IEMU.L drawdown since its inception was -38.74%, which is greater than CSUS.L's maximum drawdown of -34.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IEMU.L and CSUS.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	IEMU.L	CSUS.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-38.74%	-34.38%	-4.36%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.28%	-8.31%	-3.97%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.50%	-18.85%	+4.35%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-35.69%	-25.44%	-10.25%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-34.38%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.31%	-0.47%	+0.16%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.94%	-4.13%	-2.81%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.43%	1.97%	+1.46%

Volatility

IEMU.L vs. CSUS.L - Volatility Comparison

iShares VII plc -iShares Core MSCI EMU UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (IEMU.L) has a higher volatility of 5.66% compared to iShares VII plc - iShares MSCI USA ETF USD Acc (CSUS.L) at 3.25%. This indicates that IEMU.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CSUS.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	IEMU.L	CSUS.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.66%	3.25%	+2.41%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.14%	8.62%	+5.52%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.96%	11.80%	+5.16%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.30%	16.74%	+3.56%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.99%	17.14%	+4.85%

IEMU.L vs. CSUS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

IEMU.L has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than CSUS.L's 0.33% expense ratio.

Dividends

IEMU.L vs. CSUS.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither IEMU.L nor CSUS.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IEMU.L and CSUS.L in my portfolio?

IEMU.L and CSUS.L have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, IEMU.L or CSUS.L?

On fees, IEMU.L is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, IEMU.L or CSUS.L?

IEMU.L is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.33% for CSUS.L.

What is the main difference between IEMU.L and CSUS.L?

IEMU.L is categorized as Europe Equities, while CSUS.L is Large Cap Blend Equities. IEMU.L tracks MSCI EMU NR EUR, while CSUS.L tracks Russell 1000 TR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for IEMU.L and 0.33% for CSUS.L.