PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IEMGX vs. PDEZX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IEMGX vs. PDEZX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Voya Multi-Manager Emerging Markets Equity Fund (IEMGX) and PGIM Jennison Emerging Markets Equity Opportunities Fund (PDEZX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IEMGX achieves a 37.69% return, which is significantly higher than PDEZX's 32.69% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with IEMGX having a 11.92% annualized return and PDEZX not far ahead at 12.01%.


IEMGX

1D
-0.73%
1M
10.57%
YTD
37.69%
6M
42.32%
1Y
77.09%
3Y*
29.87%
5Y*
9.53%
10Y*
11.92%

PDEZX

1D
-1.21%
1M
1.71%
YTD
32.69%
6M
33.58%
1Y
45.85%
3Y*
27.34%
5Y*
2.22%
10Y*
12.01%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IEMGX vs. PDEZX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IEMGX
Voya Multi-Manager Emerging Markets Equity Fund
37.69%46.12%0.76%15.09%-24.13%-2.91%16.80%25.23%-19.85%44.53%
PDEZX
PGIM Jennison Emerging Markets Equity Opportunities Fund
32.69%14.88%18.48%16.12%-41.65%-0.86%72.88%30.33%-18.26%40.80%

Correlation

The correlation between IEMGX and PDEZX is 0.80, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.80

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.79

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.82

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.84

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 18, 2014

0.84

The correlation between IEMGX and PDEZX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IEMGX vs. PDEZX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IEMGX
IEMGX Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
IEMGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IEMGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
IEMGX Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
IEMGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
IEMGX Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank

PDEZX
PDEZX Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
PDEZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PDEZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
PDEZX Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
PDEZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
PDEZX Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IEMGX vs. PDEZX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Voya Multi-Manager Emerging Markets Equity Fund (IEMGX) and PGIM Jennison Emerging Markets Equity Opportunities Fund (PDEZX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IEMGXPDEZXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.17

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.25

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.73

1.37

+0.36

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.79

3.46

+2.33

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

22.01

11.90

+10.10

IEMGX vs. PDEZX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IEMGX Sharpe Ratio is 4.22, which is higher than the PDEZX Sharpe Ratio of 2.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IEMGX and PDEZX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IEMGXPDEZXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.22

2.04

+2.17

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.54

0.09

+0.45

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.66

0.54

+0.12

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.43

0.40

+0.03

Drawdowns

IEMGX vs. PDEZX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IEMGX drawdown since its inception was -41.87%, smaller than the maximum PDEZX drawdown of -54.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IEMGX and PDEZX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IEMGXPDEZXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.87%

-54.95%

+13.08%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.85%

-13.94%

-1.91%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.58%

-21.92%

+4.34%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-39.75%

-52.88%

+13.13%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.87%

-54.95%

+13.08%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.73%

-2.32%

+1.59%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.10%

-20.22%

+5.12%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.96%

4.05%

-0.09%

Volatility

IEMGX vs. PDEZX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Voya Multi-Manager Emerging Markets Equity Fund (IEMGX) is 8.44%, while PGIM Jennison Emerging Markets Equity Opportunities Fund (PDEZX) has a volatility of 9.53%. This indicates that IEMGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PDEZX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IEMGXPDEZXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.44%

9.53%

-1.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.31%

19.90%

-1.59%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.78%

23.63%

-1.85%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.08%

23.56%

-5.48%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.31%

22.24%

-3.93%

IEMGX vs. PDEZX - Expense Ratio Comparison

IEMGX has a 1.15% expense ratio, which is higher than PDEZX's 1.05% expense ratio.


Dividends

IEMGX vs. PDEZX - Dividend Comparison

IEMGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.36%, more than PDEZX's 1.66% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IEMGX
Voya Multi-Manager Emerging Markets Equity Fund
4.36%6.01%4.66%1.99%4.22%19.49%3.91%2.69%1.01%1.39%1.17%1.53%
PDEZX
PGIM Jennison Emerging Markets Equity Opportunities Fund
1.66%2.21%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


IEMGX and PDEZX have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PDEZX has higher volatility (9.53%) compared to IEMGX (8.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IEMGX dropped -41.87% vs PDEZX's -54.95%.

IEMGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.22 vs 2.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IEMGX and PDEZX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer