IEMGX vs. NASDX
Compare and contrast key facts about Voya Multi-Manager Emerging Markets Equity Fund (IEMGX) and Shelton Capital Management Nasdaq-100 Index Fund Direct Shares (NASDX).
IEMGX is managed by BlackRock. It was launched on Oct 10, 2011. NASDX is a passively managed fund by BlackRock that tracks the performance of the NASDAQ-100 Index. It was launched on Jan 18, 2000.
Performance
IEMGX vs. NASDX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
IEMGX vs. NASDX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IEMGX Voya Multi-Manager Emerging Markets Equity Fund | 4.52% | 46.12% | 0.76% | 15.09% | -24.13% | -2.91% | 16.80% | 25.23% | -19.85% | 44.53% |
NASDX Shelton Capital Management Nasdaq-100 Index Fund Direct Shares | -6.04% | 21.00% | 36.91% | 54.69% | -32.57% | 27.32% | 48.59% | 38.22% | -1.21% | 31.27% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IEMGX achieves a 4.52% return, which is significantly higher than NASDX's -6.04% return. Over the past 10 years, IEMGX has underperformed NASDX with an annualized return of 8.85%, while NASDX has yielded a comparatively higher 19.48% annualized return.
IEMGX
- 1D
- 2.76%
- 1M
- -11.83%
- YTD
- 4.52%
- 6M
- 15.19%
- 1Y
- 47.20%
- 3Y*
- 18.81%
- 5Y*
- 4.53%
- 10Y*
- 8.85%
NASDX
- 1D
- 3.39%
- 1M
- -5.03%
- YTD
- -6.04%
- 6M
- -4.08%
- 1Y
- 22.65%
- 3Y*
- 25.90%
- 5Y*
- 14.78%
- 10Y*
- 19.48%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
IEMGX vs. NASDX - Expense Ratio Comparison
IEMGX has a 1.15% expense ratio, which is higher than NASDX's 0.63% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
IEMGX vs. NASDX — Risk / Return Rank
IEMGX
NASDX
IEMGX vs. NASDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Voya Multi-Manager Emerging Markets Equity Fund (IEMGX) and Shelton Capital Management Nasdaq-100 Index Fund Direct Shares (NASDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IEMGX | NASDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.51 | 1.04 | +1.46 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.14 | 1.63 | +1.52 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.47 | 1.23 | +0.24 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.72 | 1.87 | +0.84 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.35 | 7.07 | +3.28 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IEMGX | NASDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.51 | 1.04 | +1.46 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.27 | 0.64 | -0.38 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.50 | 0.86 | -0.36 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.33 | 0.29 | +0.03 |
Correlation
The correlation between IEMGX and NASDX is 0.67, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
IEMGX vs. NASDX - Dividend Comparison
IEMGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.75%, more than NASDX's 3.80% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IEMGX Voya Multi-Manager Emerging Markets Equity Fund | 5.75% | 6.01% | 4.66% | 1.99% | 4.22% | 19.49% | 3.91% | 2.69% | 1.01% | 1.39% | 1.17% | 1.53% |
NASDX Shelton Capital Management Nasdaq-100 Index Fund Direct Shares | 3.80% | 3.76% | 16.95% | 7.61% | 3.75% | 2.59% | 1.28% | 7.09% | 2.47% | 1.65% | 0.75% | 0.85% |
Drawdowns
IEMGX vs. NASDX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IEMGX drawdown since its inception was -41.87%, smaller than the maximum NASDX drawdown of -83.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IEMGX and NASDX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| IEMGX | NASDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.87% | -83.16% | +41.29% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.85% | -12.70% | -3.15% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -39.78% | -35.33% | -4.45% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.87% | -35.33% | -6.54% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.53% | -8.91% | -4.62% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.24% | -34.59% | +19.35% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.16% | 3.37% | +0.79% |
Volatility
IEMGX vs. NASDX - Volatility Comparison
Voya Multi-Manager Emerging Markets Equity Fund (IEMGX) has a higher volatility of 11.78% compared to Shelton Capital Management Nasdaq-100 Index Fund Direct Shares (NASDX) at 6.54%. This indicates that IEMGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NASDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| IEMGX | NASDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.78% | 6.54% | +5.24% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.13% | 12.89% | +3.24% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.06% | 22.75% | -0.69% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.50% | 23.07% | -5.57% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.01% | 22.63% | -4.62% |