PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IEMGX vs. GSIYX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IEMGX vs. GSIYX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Voya Multi-Manager Emerging Markets Equity Fund (IEMGX) and Goldman Sachs GQG Partners International Opportunities Fund Class R6 (GSIYX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IEMGX achieves a 22.74% return, which is significantly higher than GSIYX's 8.15% return.


IEMGX

1D
4.16%
1M
-5.97%
6M
9.37%
YTD
22.74%
1Y
50.07%
3Y*
22.24%
5Y*
8.70%
10Y*
9.90%
ALL TIME*
6.71%

GSIYX

1D
0.62%
1M
2.02%
6M
4.43%
YTD
8.15%
1Y
15.65%
3Y*
15.48%
5Y*
9.23%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
12.79%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

IEMGX vs. GSIYX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IEMGX
Voya Multi-Manager Emerging Markets Equity Fund
22.74%46.12%0.76%15.09%-24.13%-2.91%16.80%25.23%-19.85%44.53%
GSIYX
Goldman Sachs GQG Partners International Opportunities Fund Class R6
8.15%20.89%9.69%22.07%-10.99%12.47%15.86%27.59%-6.02%29.91%

Correlation

The correlation between IEMGX and GSIYX is 0.15, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.15

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.46

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.59

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2017

0.68

Over the past year, the correlation between IEMGX and GSIYX has dropped to 0.15 - well below their long-term average of 0.68, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IEMGX vs. GSIYX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

IEMGX
IEMGX Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
IEMGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IEMGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
IEMGX Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
IEMGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
IEMGX Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank

GSIYX
GSIYX Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
GSIYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GSIYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
GSIYX Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
GSIYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
GSIYX Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

IEMGX vs. GSIYX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Voya Multi-Manager Emerging Markets Equity Fund (IEMGX) and Goldman Sachs GQG Partners International Opportunities Fund Class R6 (GSIYX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IEMGXGSIYXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.36

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.22

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.29

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.07

2.01

+1.06

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.86

5.51

+4.35

IEMGX vs. GSIYX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IEMGX Sharpe Ratio is 1.96, which is comparable to the GSIYX Sharpe Ratio of 1.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IEMGX and GSIYX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IEMGX vs. GSIYX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IEMGX drawdown since its inception was -41.87%, which is greater than GSIYX's maximum drawdown of -28.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IEMGX and GSIYX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IEMGXGSIYXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.87%

-28.79%

-13.08%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.64%

-7.81%

-9.83%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.64%

-10.30%

-7.34%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-37.33%

-25.36%

-11.97%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.87%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-14.21%

-2.17%

-12.04%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.02%

-4.80%

-10.22%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.31%

2.85%

+2.46%

Volatility

IEMGX vs. GSIYX - Volatility Comparison

Voya Multi-Manager Emerging Markets Equity Fund (IEMGX) has a higher volatility of 10.84% compared to Goldman Sachs GQG Partners International Opportunities Fund Class R6 (GSIYX) at 2.75%. This indicates that IEMGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GSIYX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IEMGXGSIYXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.84%

2.75%

+8.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

24.96%

8.20%

+16.76%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

27.72%

9.88%

+17.84%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.56%

14.27%

+5.29%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.98%

15.62%

+3.36%

IEMGX vs. GSIYX - Expense Ratio Comparison

IEMGX has a 1.15% expense ratio, which is higher than GSIYX's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

IEMGX vs. GSIYX - Dividend Comparison

IEMGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.89%, more than GSIYX's 4.76% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GSIYX
Goldman Sachs GQG Partners International Opportunities Fund Class R6
4.76%5.14%11.21%2.38%4.91%2.25%0.19%0.67%0.55%0.16%0.00%0.00%
IEMGX
Voya Multi-Manager Emerging Markets Equity Fund
4.89%6.01%4.66%1.99%4.22%19.49%3.91%2.69%1.01%1.39%1.17%1.53%

Frequently Asked Questions


IEMGX and GSIYX have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IEMGX has higher volatility (10.84%) compared to GSIYX (2.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IEMGX dropped -41.87% vs GSIYX's -28.79%.

IEMGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.96 vs 1.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IEMGX and GSIYX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer