IEMG vs. XCNY
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (IEMG) and SPDR S&P Emerging Markets ex-China ETF (XCNY).
IEMG and XCNY are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. IEMG is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI Emerging Markets Investable Market Index. It was launched on Oct 18, 2012. XCNY is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the S&P Emerging ex-China BMI. It was launched on Sep 4, 2024. Both IEMG and XCNY are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
IEMG vs. XCNY - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
IEMG vs. XCNY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
IEMG iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF | 4.55% | 32.56% | -0.26% |
XCNY SPDR S&P Emerging Markets ex-China ETF | 2.91% | 20.42% | -3.51% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IEMG achieves a 4.55% return, which is significantly higher than XCNY's 2.91% return.
IEMG
- 1D
- 0.76%
- 1M
- -6.83%
- YTD
- 4.55%
- 6M
- 7.62%
- 1Y
- 33.51%
- 3Y*
- 16.36%
- 5Y*
- 4.53%
- 10Y*
- 8.31%
XCNY
- 1D
- 0.45%
- 1M
- -5.62%
- YTD
- 2.91%
- 6M
- 7.19%
- 1Y
- 27.38%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
IEMG vs. XCNY - Expense Ratio Comparison
IEMG has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than XCNY's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
IEMG vs. XCNY — Risk / Return Rank
IEMG
XCNY
IEMG vs. XCNY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (IEMG) and SPDR S&P Emerging Markets ex-China ETF (XCNY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IEMG | XCNY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.70 | 1.46 | +0.24 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.30 | 2.12 | +0.18 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.30 | +0.04 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.58 | 2.32 | +0.26 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.84 | 8.97 | +0.87 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IEMG | XCNY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.70 | 1.46 | +0.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.25 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.42 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.28 | 0.71 | -0.43 |
Correlation
The correlation between IEMG and XCNY is 0.85, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
IEMG vs. XCNY - Dividend Comparison
IEMG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.63%, which matches XCNY's 2.61% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IEMG iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF | 2.63% | 2.75% | 3.20% | 2.89% | 2.71% | 3.06% | 1.87% | 3.15% | 2.76% | 2.35% | 2.28% | 2.53% |
XCNY SPDR S&P Emerging Markets ex-China ETF | 2.61% | 2.68% | 1.07% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
IEMG vs. XCNY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IEMG drawdown since its inception was -38.71%, which is greater than XCNY's maximum drawdown of -19.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IEMG and XCNY.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| IEMG | XCNY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.71% | -19.70% | -19.01% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.21% | -11.86% | -1.35% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.93% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.71% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.40% | -8.34% | -1.06% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.11% | -4.39% | -8.72% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.46% | 3.07% | +0.39% |
Volatility
IEMG vs. XCNY - Volatility Comparison
iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (IEMG) has a higher volatility of 9.35% compared to SPDR S&P Emerging Markets ex-China ETF (XCNY) at 8.18%. This indicates that IEMG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XCNY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| IEMG | XCNY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.35% | 8.18% | +1.17% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.68% | 12.38% | +2.30% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.79% | 18.81% | +0.98% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.91% | 17.12% | +0.79% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.84% | 17.12% | +2.72% |