IEMG vs. UEVM
IEMG (iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF) and UEVM (VictoryShares Emerging Markets Value Momentum ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IEMG is a Emerging Markets Diversified fund tracking the MSCI Emerging Markets Investable Market Index, while UEVM is a Momentum fund tracking the Nasdaq Victory Emerging Market Value Momentum Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, IEMG returned 7.58%/yr vs 7.55%/yr for UEVM. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. IEMG charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for UEVM.
Performance
IEMG vs. UEVM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IEMG achieves a 26.21% return, which is significantly higher than UEVM's 8.99% return.
IEMG
- 1D
- -1.34%
- 1M
- 7.97%
- YTD
- 26.21%
- 6M
- 28.63%
- 1Y
- 52.58%
- 3Y*
- 23.55%
- 5Y*
- 7.58%
- 10Y*
- 10.41%
UEVM
- 1D
- -1.86%
- 1M
- 0.77%
- YTD
- 8.99%
- 6M
- 8.31%
- 1Y
- 24.92%
- 3Y*
- 18.34%
- 5Y*
- 7.55%
- 10Y*
- —
IEMG vs. UEVM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IEMG iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF | 26.21% | 32.56% | 6.50% | 11.52% | -19.98% | -0.64% | 17.87% | 17.81% | -14.92% | 5.48% |
UEVM VictoryShares Emerging Markets Value Momentum ETF | 8.99% | 22.74% | 11.92% | 17.41% | -14.60% | 11.09% | 3.77% | 10.71% | -16.96% | 3.70% |
Correlation
The correlation between IEMG and UEVM is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 27, 2017 | 0.91 |
The correlation between IEMG and UEVM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.
IEMG vs. UEVM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IEMG
UEVM
Technology
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Energy
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Real Estate
Technology
IEMG
UEVM
Financial Services
IEMG
UEVM
Consumer Cyclical
IEMG
UEVM
Industrials
IEMG
UEVM
Basic Materials
IEMG
UEVM
Communication Services
IEMG
UEVM
Energy
IEMG
UEVM
Healthcare
IEMG
UEVM
Consumer Defensive
IEMG
UEVM
Utilities
IEMG
UEVM
Real Estate
IEMG
UEVM
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IEMG vs. UEVM — Risk / Return Rank
IEMG
UEVM
IEMG vs. UEVM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (IEMG) and VictoryShares Emerging Markets Value Momentum ETF (UEVM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IEMG | UEVM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.72 | 1.65 | +1.07 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.53 | 2.26 | +1.27 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.50 | 1.30 | +0.20 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.00 | 2.56 | +1.44 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.38 | 8.65 | +6.73 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IEMG | UEVM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.72 | 1.65 | +1.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.41 | 0.48 | -0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.52 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.35 | 0.33 | +0.03 |
Drawdowns
IEMG vs. UEVM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IEMG drawdown since its inception was -38.71%, smaller than the maximum UEVM drawdown of -45.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IEMG and UEVM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IEMG | UEVM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.71% | -45.44% | +6.73% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.21% | -9.79% | -3.42% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.21% | -18.88% | +1.67% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.83% | -26.98% | -8.85% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.71% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.34% | -2.18% | +0.84% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.97% | -11.67% | -1.30% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.43% | 2.89% | +0.54% |
Volatility
IEMG vs. UEVM - Volatility Comparison
iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (IEMG) has a higher volatility of 8.31% compared to VictoryShares Emerging Markets Value Momentum ETF (UEVM) at 5.15%. This indicates that IEMG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UEVM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IEMG | UEVM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.31% | 5.15% | +3.16% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.93% | 12.13% | +4.80% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.43% | 15.18% | +4.25% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.38% | 15.90% | +2.48% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.03% | 18.39% | +1.64% |
IEMG vs. UEVM - Expense Ratio Comparison
IEMG has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than UEVM's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
IEMG vs. UEVM - Dividend Comparison
IEMG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.18%, less than UEVM's 3.05% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IEMG iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF | 2.18% | 2.75% | 3.20% | 2.89% | 2.71% | 3.06% | 1.87% | 3.15% | 2.76% | 2.35% | 2.28% | 2.53% |
UEVM VictoryShares Emerging Markets Value Momentum ETF | 3.05% | 4.02% | 5.65% | 4.71% | 3.46% | 4.49% | 2.19% | 2.79% | 2.34% | 0.79% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IEMG and UEVM have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IEMG has higher volatility (8.31%) compared to UEVM (5.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IEMG dropped -38.71% vs UEVM's -45.44%.
On 5-year performance, IEMG leads with 7.58% vs 7.55% for UEVM. On fees, IEMG is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, UEVM has been the lower-risk option at 5.15%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, IEMG has performed better with a 7.58% return vs 7.55%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IEMG is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for UEVM.
UEVM has the higher dividend yield at 3.05%, compared with 2.18% for IEMG.
IEMG is categorized as Emerging Markets Diversified, while UEVM is Momentum. IEMG tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Investable Market Index, while UEVM tracks Nasdaq Victory Emerging Market Value Momentum Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Victory Capital. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for IEMG and 0.45% for UEVM.
IEMG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.72 vs 1.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IEMG and UEVM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer