PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IEMG vs. AVUV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IEMG vs. AVUV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (IEMG) and Avantis US Small Cap Value ETF (AVUV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with IEMG having a 16.97% return and AVUV slightly higher at 17.68%.


IEMG

1D
-6.40%
1M
-3.49%
YTD
16.97%
6M
18.63%
1Y
38.44%
3Y*
20.12%
5Y*
5.95%
10Y*
9.39%

AVUV

1D
-1.44%
1M
0.44%
YTD
17.68%
6M
17.05%
1Y
35.45%
3Y*
18.50%
5Y*
10.66%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IEMG vs. AVUV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
IEMG
iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF
16.97%32.56%6.50%11.52%-19.98%-0.64%17.87%11.22%
AVUV
Avantis US Small Cap Value ETF
17.68%7.44%9.28%22.82%-4.91%42.20%6.43%8.50%

Correlation

The correlation between IEMG and AVUV is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.51

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.52

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.56

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 27, 2019

0.56

The correlation between IEMG and AVUV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.51 to 0.56 - a consistent structural relationship.

IEMG vs. AVUV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IEMG
AVUV

Technology

35.0%
7.0%

Financial Services

18.4%
25.8%

Consumer Cyclical

9.5%
18.0%

Industrials

9.0%
13.9%

Basic Materials

6.9%
4.9%

Communication Services

6.4%
2.8%

Energy

3.8%
18.2%

Healthcare

3.7%
4.2%

Consumer Defensive

3.3%
4.5%

Utilities

2.2%
0.1%

Real Estate

1.7%
0.7%

Technology

IEMG
35.0%
AVUV
7.0%

Financial Services

IEMG
18.4%
AVUV
25.8%

Consumer Cyclical

IEMG
9.5%
AVUV
18.0%

Industrials

IEMG
9.0%
AVUV
13.9%

Basic Materials

IEMG
6.9%
AVUV
4.9%

Communication Services

IEMG
6.4%
AVUV
2.8%

Energy

IEMG
3.8%
AVUV
18.2%

Healthcare

IEMG
3.7%
AVUV
4.2%

Consumer Defensive

IEMG
3.3%
AVUV
4.5%

Utilities

IEMG
2.2%
AVUV
0.1%

Real Estate

IEMG
1.7%
AVUV
0.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IEMG vs. AVUV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IEMG
IEMG Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
IEMG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IEMG Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
IEMG Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
IEMG Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
IEMG Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank

AVUV
AVUV Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
AVUV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AVUV Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
AVUV Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
AVUV Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
AVUV Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IEMG vs. AVUV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (IEMG) and Avantis US Small Cap Value ETF (AVUV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IEMGAVUVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.23

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.58

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.37

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.97

4.73

-1.76

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.26

14.03

-2.77

IEMG vs. AVUV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IEMG Sharpe Ratio is 1.91, which is comparable to the AVUV Sharpe Ratio of 2.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IEMG and AVUV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IEMGAVUVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.91

2.14

-0.23

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.32

0.47

-0.15

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.47

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.32

0.56

-0.24

Drawdowns

IEMG vs. AVUV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IEMG drawdown since its inception was -38.71%, smaller than the maximum AVUV drawdown of -49.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IEMG and AVUV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IEMGAVUVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.71%

-49.42%

+10.71%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.21%

-7.95%

-5.26%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.21%

-28.79%

+11.58%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.75%

-28.79%

-6.96%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.71%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.56%

-1.44%

-7.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.97%

-7.94%

-5.03%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.47%

2.67%

+0.80%

Volatility

IEMG vs. AVUV - Volatility Comparison

iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (IEMG) has a higher volatility of 10.23% compared to Avantis US Small Cap Value ETF (AVUV) at 4.30%. This indicates that IEMG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AVUV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IEMGAVUVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.23%

4.30%

+5.93%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.28%

11.36%

+6.92%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.52%

17.56%

+2.96%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.60%

22.74%

-4.14%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.13%

28.29%

-8.16%

IEMG vs. AVUV - Expense Ratio Comparison

IEMG has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than AVUV's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

IEMG vs. AVUV - Dividend Comparison

IEMG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.35%, more than AVUV's 1.30% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AVUV
Avantis US Small Cap Value ETF
1.30%1.58%1.61%1.65%1.74%1.28%1.21%0.38%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
IEMG
iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF
2.35%2.75%3.20%2.89%2.71%3.06%1.87%3.15%2.76%2.35%2.28%2.53%

Frequently Asked Questions


IEMG and AVUV have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IEMG has higher volatility (10.23%) compared to AVUV (4.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IEMG dropped -38.71% vs AVUV's -49.42%.

On 5-year performance, AVUV leads with 10.66% vs 5.95% for IEMG. On fees, IEMG is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, AVUV has been the lower-risk option at 4.30%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, AVUV has performed better with a 10.66% return vs 5.95%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IEMG is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for AVUV.

IEMG has the higher dividend yield at 2.35%, compared with 1.30% for AVUV.

IEMG is categorized as Emerging Markets Diversified, while AVUV is Small Cap Value Equities. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Avantis. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for IEMG and 0.25% for AVUV.

AVUV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.14 vs 1.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IEMG and AVUV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer