PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
IEMD.L vs. CNDX.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

IEMD.L vs. CNDX.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

IEMD.L (iShares Edge MSCI Europe Momentum Factor UCITS ETF EUR (Dist)) and CNDX.L (iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IEMD.L is a Momentum fund tracking the MSCI Europe Momentum Index, while CNDX.L is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, IEMD.L returned 11.34%/yr vs 18.70%/yr for CNDX.L. A 0.59 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IEMD.L charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.33%/yr for CNDX.L.

Performance

IEMD.L vs. CNDX.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares Edge MSCI Europe Momentum Factor UCITS ETF EUR (Dist) (IEMD.L) and iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (CNDX.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

IEMD.L is traded in EUR, while CNDX.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the CNDX.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IEMD.L achieves a 8.04% return, which is significantly lower than CNDX.L's 21.02% return.

IEMD.L

1D
-0.30%
1M
2.61%
YTD
8.04%
6M
11.36%
1Y
17.49%
3Y*
20.17%
5Y*
11.34%
10Y*
—

CNDX.L

1D
-0.80%
1M
9.24%
YTD
21.02%
6M
19.42%
1Y
37.92%
3Y*
24.58%
5Y*
18.70%
10Y*
21.36%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IEMD.L vs. CNDX.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
IEMD.L
iShares Edge MSCI Europe Momentum Factor UCITS ETF EUR (Dist)		8.04%26.34%20.48%12.54%-14.50%21.92%10.99%29.63%-9.29%
CNDX.L
iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF		21.02%5.54%34.80%51.63%-29.33%37.53%36.10%41.19%-1.91%

Correlation

The correlation between IEMD.L and CNDX.L is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.53

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.53

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.53

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 1, 2018

0.60

The correlation between IEMD.L and CNDX.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.53 to 0.59 - a consistent structural relationship.

IEMD.L vs. CNDX.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
IEMD.L
CNDX.L

Financial Services

23.7%
0.2%

Healthcare

15.6%
3.8%

Industrials

15.2%
2.8%

Utilities

12.6%
1.3%

Energy

11.0%
0.5%

Technology

7.9%
57.3%

Basic Materials

7.6%
1.1%

Communication Services

2.9%
14.5%

Consumer Defensive

2.8%
6.9%

Consumer Cyclical

0.5%
11.6%

Real Estate

0.4%
0.1%

Financial Services

IEMD.L
23.7%
CNDX.L
0.2%

Healthcare

IEMD.L
15.6%
CNDX.L
3.8%

Industrials

IEMD.L
15.2%
CNDX.L
2.8%

Utilities

IEMD.L
12.6%
CNDX.L
1.3%

Energy

IEMD.L
11.0%
CNDX.L
0.5%

Technology

IEMD.L
7.9%
CNDX.L
57.3%

Basic Materials

IEMD.L
7.6%
CNDX.L
1.1%

Communication Services

IEMD.L
2.9%
CNDX.L
14.5%

Consumer Defensive

IEMD.L
2.8%
CNDX.L
6.9%

Consumer Cyclical

IEMD.L
0.5%
CNDX.L
11.6%

Real Estate

IEMD.L
0.4%
CNDX.L
0.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

iShares Edge MSCI Europe Momentum Factor UCITS ETF EUR (Dist)

iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF

Often compared with IEMD.L:
IEMD.L vs. CEMR.DEIEMD.L vs. EIMI.LIEMD.L vs. ZPDX.DEIEMD.L vs. URTHIEMD.L vs. IVVIEMD.L vs. VOOIEMD.L vs. IWMO.L
Often compared with CNDX.L:
CNDX.L vs. QQQCNDX.L vs. EQQQ.DECNDX.L vs. SXRV.DECNDX.L vs. CNX1.LCNDX.L vs. CSPX.LCNDX.L vs. EQQU.LCNDX.L vs. VWRA.L

Return for Risk

IEMD.L vs. CNDX.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
IEMD.L
IEMD.L Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
IEMD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IEMD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
IEMD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
IEMD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
IEMD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank
CNDX.L
CNDX.L Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
CNDX.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CNDX.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
CNDX.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
CNDX.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
CNDX.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IEMD.L vs. CNDX.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Edge MSCI Europe Momentum Factor UCITS ETF EUR (Dist) (IEMD.L) and iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (CNDX.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

IEMD.LCNDX.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
1.05
2.30

-1.25

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
1.61
3.11

-1.50

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.41

-0.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.51

3.65

-2.14

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.57

10.81

-5.25

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

IEMD.L vs. CNDX.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IEMD.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.05, which is lower than the CNDX.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IEMD.L and CNDX.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

IEMD.LCNDX.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.05

2.30

-1.25

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.70

0.91

-0.20

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

—

1.05

—

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.70

1.12

-0.42

Drawdowns

IEMD.L vs. CNDX.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IEMD.L drawdown since its inception was -30.77%, roughly equal to the maximum CNDX.L drawdown of -31.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IEMD.L and CNDX.L.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

IEMD.LCNDX.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.77%

-31.40%

+0.63%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.53%

-10.26%

-1.27%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.64%

-25.93%

+10.29%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.73%

-31.40%

+7.67%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

—

-31.40%

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.00%

-0.80%

-0.20%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.91%

-5.48%

-0.43%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.13%

3.48%

-0.35%

Volatility

IEMD.L vs. CNDX.L - Volatility Comparison

iShares Edge MSCI Europe Momentum Factor UCITS ETF EUR (Dist) (IEMD.L) and iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (CNDX.L) have volatilities of 4.68% and 4.60%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

IEMD.LCNDX.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.68%

4.60%

+0.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.14%

11.80%

+2.34%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.56%

16.28%

+0.28%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.11%

20.60%

-4.49%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.82%

20.35%

-3.53%

IEMD.L vs. CNDX.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

IEMD.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than CNDX.L's 0.33% expense ratio.

Dividends

IEMD.L vs. CNDX.L - Dividend Comparison

IEMD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.71%, while CNDX.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CNDX.L
iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF		0.00%0.00%0.02%0.05%0.06%0.03%0.04%0.07%0.06%0.30%0.16%0.16%
IEMD.L
iShares Edge MSCI Europe Momentum Factor UCITS ETF EUR (Dist)		1.71%1.85%2.70%2.78%2.90%1.77%1.36%2.00%2.51%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

IEMD.L and CNDX.L have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, IEMD.L is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IEMD.L is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.33% for CNDX.L.

IEMD.L is categorized as Momentum, while CNDX.L is Nasdaq-100. IEMD.L tracks MSCI Europe Momentum Index, while CNDX.L tracks NASDAQ-100 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for IEMD.L and 0.33% for CNDX.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IEMD.L and CNDX.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer