IEMB.L vs. XQUA.L
IEMB.L (iShares J.P. Morgan USD EM Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist)) and XQUA.L (Xtrackers ESG USD Emerging Markets Bond Quality Weighted UCITS ETF 1D) are both Emerging Markets Bonds funds. Over the past 10 years, IEMB.L returned 3.32%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for XQUA.L. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.45% expense ratio.
Performance
IEMB.L vs. XQUA.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IEMB.L achieves a 1.62% return, which is significantly higher than XQUA.L's 0.94% return. Over the past 10 years, IEMB.L has outperformed XQUA.L with an annualized return of 3.32%, while XQUA.L has yielded a comparatively lower 0.95% annualized return.
IEMB.L
- 1D
- 0.41%
- 1M
- 1.01%
- YTD
- 1.62%
- 6M
- 2.22%
- 1Y
- 11.20%
- 3Y*
- 9.72%
- 5Y*
- 1.91%
- 10Y*
- 3.32%
XQUA.L
- 1D
- 0.35%
- 1M
- 0.59%
- YTD
- 0.94%
- 6M
- 0.97%
- 1Y
- 8.08%
- 3Y*
- 5.25%
- 5Y*
- -0.11%
- 10Y*
- 0.95%
IEMB.L vs. XQUA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IEMB.L iShares J.P. Morgan USD EM Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | 1.62% | 13.71% | 5.70% | 10.54% | -18.35% | -2.28% | 5.57% | 16.06% | -5.53% | 9.73% |
XQUA.L Xtrackers ESG USD Emerging Markets Bond Quality Weighted UCITS ETF 1D | 0.94% | 10.82% | -0.40% | 7.51% | -17.76% | -1.45% | 6.97% | 10.02% | -6.59% | 4.54% |
Correlation
The correlation between IEMB.L and XQUA.L is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 13, 2016 | 0.90 |
The correlation between IEMB.L and XQUA.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IEMB.L vs. XQUA.L — Risk / Return Rank
IEMB.L
XQUA.L
IEMB.L vs. XQUA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares J.P. Morgan USD EM Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (IEMB.L) and Xtrackers ESG USD Emerging Markets Bond Quality Weighted UCITS ETF 1D (XQUA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IEMB.L | XQUA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.17 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.29 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.32 | +0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.58 | 2.00 | +0.58 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.73 | 7.21 | +3.53 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IEMB.L | XQUA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.88 | 1.72 | +0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.21 | -0.01 | +0.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.36 | 0.11 | +0.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.51 | 0.11 | +0.39 |
Drawdowns
IEMB.L vs. XQUA.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IEMB.L drawdown since its inception was -32.08%, which is greater than XQUA.L's maximum drawdown of -26.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IEMB.L and XQUA.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IEMB.L | XQUA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.08% | -26.27% | -5.81% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.32% | -4.02% | -0.30% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -7.54% | -8.21% | +0.67% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.62% | -26.26% | -2.36% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -28.62% | -26.27% | -2.35% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.11% | -2.91% | +2.80% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.02% | -7.73% | +2.71% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.04% | 1.12% | -0.08% |
Volatility
IEMB.L vs. XQUA.L - Volatility Comparison
iShares J.P. Morgan USD EM Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (IEMB.L) has a higher volatility of 2.57% compared to Xtrackers ESG USD Emerging Markets Bond Quality Weighted UCITS ETF 1D (XQUA.L) at 1.74%. This indicates that IEMB.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XQUA.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IEMB.L | XQUA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.57% | 1.74% | +0.83% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.93% | 3.72% | +1.21% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.95% | 4.71% | +1.24% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 8.87% | 8.01% | +0.86% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 9.25% | 8.65% | +0.60% |
IEMB.L vs. XQUA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both IEMB.L and XQUA.L have an expense ratio of 0.45%.
Dividends
IEMB.L vs. XQUA.L - Dividend Comparison
IEMB.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.83%, more than XQUA.L's 4.61% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IEMB.L iShares J.P. Morgan USD EM Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | 5.83% | 5.85% | 5.80% | 5.65% | 5.55% | 3.95% | 3.86% | 4.73% | 4.82% | 4.79% | 5.57% | 4.78% |
XQUA.L Xtrackers ESG USD Emerging Markets Bond Quality Weighted UCITS ETF 1D | 4.61% | 4.49% | 4.61% | 4.24% | 6.92% | 4.08% | 4.54% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.93, IEMB.L and XQUA.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
Both ETFs have the same 0.45% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IEMB.L and XQUA.L have the same expense ratio: 0.45% per year.
They also come from different issuers: iShares and Xtrackers.
Find the right allocation for IEMB.L and XQUA.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer