PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
IEFV.L vs. TDGB.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

IEFV.L vs. TDGB.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

IEFV.L (iShares Edge MSCI Europe Value Factor UCITS ETF) and TDGB.L (VanEck Morningstar Developed Markets Dividend Leaders UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IEFV.L is a Europe Equities fund tracking the MSCI Europe Value NR EUR, while TDGB.L is a Global Equities fund tracking the Morningstar Developed Markets Large Cap Dividend Leaders Screened Select Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, IEFV.L returned 14.64%/yr vs 17.70%/yr for TDGB.L. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. IEFV.L charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.38%/yr for TDGB.L.

Performance

IEFV.L vs. TDGB.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares Edge MSCI Europe Value Factor UCITS ETF (IEFV.L) and VanEck Morningstar Developed Markets Dividend Leaders UCITS ETF (TDGB.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

IEFV.L is traded in GBp, while TDGB.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the TDGB.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IEFV.L achieves a 12.95% return, which is significantly higher than TDGB.L's 8.92% return.

IEFV.L

1D
0.27%
1M
5.00%
YTD
12.95%
6M
16.06%
1Y
36.47%
3Y*
21.78%
5Y*
14.64%
10Y*
11.79%

TDGB.L

1D
0.48%
1M
0.92%
YTD
8.92%
6M
11.81%
1Y
29.32%
3Y*
20.13%
5Y*
17.70%
10Y*
—
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IEFV.L vs. TDGB.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
IEFV.L
iShares Edge MSCI Europe Value Factor UCITS ETF		12.95%42.20%5.40%11.41%1.47%18.58%-3.74%10.98%
TDGB.L
VanEck Morningstar Developed Markets Dividend Leaders UCITS ETF		8.92%30.88%10.65%9.06%22.49%19.59%-5.61%10.74%

Correlation

The correlation between IEFV.L and TDGB.L is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.68

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.80

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.81

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 21, 2019

0.84

The correlation between IEFV.L and TDGB.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.68 (1 year) to 0.84 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

IEFV.L vs. TDGB.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
IEFV.L
TDGB.L

Financial Services

22.6%
31.7%

Industrials

17.4%
3.9%

Healthcare

12.5%
14.4%

Technology

12.1%
0.3%

Consumer Defensive

8.6%
10.1%

Consumer Cyclical

6.6%
3.8%

Basic Materials

6.3%
1.2%

Energy

5.0%
19.7%

Utilities

4.4%
6.2%

Communication Services

3.8%
8.7%

Real Estate

0.7%
0.0%

Financial Services

IEFV.L
22.6%
TDGB.L
31.7%

Industrials

IEFV.L
17.4%
TDGB.L
3.9%

Healthcare

IEFV.L
12.5%
TDGB.L
14.4%

Technology

IEFV.L
12.1%
TDGB.L
0.3%

Consumer Defensive

IEFV.L
8.6%
TDGB.L
10.1%

Consumer Cyclical

IEFV.L
6.6%
TDGB.L
3.8%

Basic Materials

IEFV.L
6.3%
TDGB.L
1.2%

Energy

IEFV.L
5.0%
TDGB.L
19.7%

Utilities

IEFV.L
4.4%
TDGB.L
6.2%

Communication Services

IEFV.L
3.8%
TDGB.L
8.7%

Real Estate

IEFV.L
0.7%
TDGB.L
0.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

iShares Edge MSCI Europe Value Factor UCITS ETF

VanEck Morningstar Developed Markets Dividend Leaders UCITS ETF

Often compared with IEFV.L:
IEFV.L vs. EVAL.LIEFV.L vs. BRK-BIEFV.L vs. NASL.LIEFV.L vs. SMEA.LIEFV.L vs. UC96.LIEFV.L vs. XDAX.LIEFV.L vs. EFV
Often compared with TDGB.L:
TDGB.L vs. VHYL.ASTDGB.L vs. SCHDTDGB.L vs. SPYDTDGB.L vs. LDEG.LTDGB.L vs. VHYD.LTDGB.L vs. JEGP.LTDGB.L vs. CSKR.L

Return for Risk

IEFV.L vs. TDGB.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
IEFV.L
IEFV.L Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
IEFV.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IEFV.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
IEFV.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
IEFV.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
IEFV.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
TDGB.L
TDGB.L Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
TDGB.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TDGB.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
TDGB.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
TDGB.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
TDGB.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IEFV.L vs. TDGB.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Edge MSCI Europe Value Factor UCITS ETF (IEFV.L) and VanEck Morningstar Developed Markets Dividend Leaders UCITS ETF (TDGB.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

IEFV.LTDGB.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
2.74
3.15

-0.41

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
3.69
4.38

-0.70

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.50

1.59

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.43

6.26

-2.82

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.64

20.72

-8.08

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

IEFV.L vs. TDGB.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IEFV.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.74, which is comparable to the TDGB.L Sharpe Ratio of 3.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IEFV.L and TDGB.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

IEFV.LTDGB.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.74

3.15

-0.41

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.97

1.55

-0.58

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.71

—

—

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.59

0.98

-0.39

Drawdowns

IEFV.L vs. TDGB.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IEFV.L drawdown since its inception was -34.64%, which is greater than TDGB.L's maximum drawdown of -29.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IEFV.L and TDGB.L.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

IEFV.LTDGB.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.64%

-29.60%

-5.04%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.57%

-4.66%

-5.91%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.02%

-12.41%

-2.61%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.16%

-12.41%

-3.75%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.64%

—

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.70%

-1.47%

+0.77%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.95%

-3.70%

-2.25%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.88%

1.41%

+1.47%

Volatility

IEFV.L vs. TDGB.L - Volatility Comparison

iShares Edge MSCI Europe Value Factor UCITS ETF (IEFV.L) has a higher volatility of 4.25% compared to VanEck Morningstar Developed Markets Dividend Leaders UCITS ETF (TDGB.L) at 2.49%. This indicates that IEFV.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TDGB.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

IEFV.LTDGB.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.25%

2.49%

+1.76%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.74%

7.01%

+3.73%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.27%

9.28%

+3.99%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.04%

11.42%

+3.62%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.70%

14.44%

+2.26%

IEFV.L vs. TDGB.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

IEFV.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than TDGB.L's 0.38% expense ratio.

Dividends

IEFV.L vs. TDGB.L - Dividend Comparison

IEFV.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TDGB.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.20%.

PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
IEFV.L
iShares Edge MSCI Europe Value Factor UCITS ETF		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TDGB.L
VanEck Morningstar Developed Markets Dividend Leaders UCITS ETF		3.20%3.50%4.27%4.93%4.40%4.06%4.16%4.52%

Frequently Asked Questions

IEFV.L and TDGB.L have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, IEFV.L is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IEFV.L is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.38% for TDGB.L.

IEFV.L is categorized as Europe Equities, while TDGB.L is Global Equities. IEFV.L tracks MSCI Europe Value NR EUR, while TDGB.L tracks Morningstar Developed Markets Large Cap Dividend Leaders Screened Select Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for IEFV.L and 0.38% for TDGB.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IEFV.L and TDGB.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer