IEFV.L vs. SJPA.L

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

IEFV.L (iShares Edge MSCI Europe Value Factor UCITS ETF) and SJPA.L (iShares Core MSCI Japan IMI UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IEFV.L is a Europe Equities fund tracking the MSCI Europe Value NR EUR, while SJPA.L is a Japan Equities fund tracking the TOPIX TR JPY. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IEFV.L returned 12.53%/yr vs 10.26%/yr for SJPA.L. A 0.58 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IEFV.L charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for SJPA.L.

Performance

IEFV.L vs. SJPA.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares Edge MSCI Europe Value Factor UCITS ETF (IEFV.L) and iShares Core MSCI Japan IMI UCITS ETF (SJPA.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IEFV.L achieves a 13.29% return, which is significantly lower than SJPA.L's 15.47% return. Over the past 10 years, IEFV.L has outperformed SJPA.L with an annualized return of 12.53%, while SJPA.L has yielded a comparatively lower 10.26% annualized return.

IEFV.L

• 1D: 2.32%
• 1M: 3.09%
• YTD: 13.29%
• 6M: 14.84%
• 1Y: 34.42%
• 3Y*: 21.49%
• 5Y*: 14.55%
• 10Y*: 12.53%

SJPA.L

• 1D: 2.26%
• 1M: 0.53%
• YTD: 15.47%
• 6M: 14.66%
• 1Y: 32.71%
• 3Y*: 14.56%
• 5Y*: 9.85%
• 10Y*: 10.26%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IEFV.L vs. SJPA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
IEFV.L iShares Edge MSCI Europe Value Factor UCITS ETF	13.29%	42.20%	5.40%	11.41%	1.47%	18.58%	-3.74%	15.71%	-12.67%	14.28%
SJPA.L iShares Core MSCI Japan IMI UCITS ETF	15.47%	18.19%	8.36%	12.76%	-6.21%	1.62%	11.03%	14.68%	-9.15%	14.69%

Correlation

The correlation between IEFV.L and SJPA.L is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.60
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.50
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.48
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.57
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 19, 2015	0.58

The correlation between IEFV.L and SJPA.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.48 (5 years) to 0.60 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

IEFV.L vs. SJPA.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	IEFV.L	SJPA.L
Financial Services	22.6%	15.9%
Industrials	17.4%	25.6%
Healthcare	12.5%	5.5%
Technology	12.1%	19.1%
Consumer Defensive	8.6%	4.1%
Consumer Cyclical	6.6%	12.5%
Basic Materials	6.3%	4.6%
Energy	5.0%	0.9%
Utilities	4.4%	1.2%
Communication Services	3.8%	7.6%
Real Estate	0.7%	3.1%

Return for Risk

IEFV.L vs. SJPA.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IEFV.L

IEFV.L Risk / Return Rank: 81
IEFV.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
IEFV.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 87
IEFV.L Omega Ratio Rank: 86
IEFV.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 72
IEFV.L Martin Ratio Rank: 72

SJPA.L

SJPA.L Risk / Return Rank: 65
SJPA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 63
SJPA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 65
SJPA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 67
SJPA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 69
SJPA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 63

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IEFV.L vs. SJPA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Edge MSCI Europe Value Factor UCITS ETF (IEFV.L) and iShares Core MSCI Japan IMI UCITS ETF (SJPA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	IEFV.L	SJPA.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.52	1.82	+0.70
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.46	2.62	+0.84
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.46	1.35	+0.11
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.24	3.04	+0.20
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.85	9.86	+2.00

IEFV.L vs. SJPA.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IEFV.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.52, which is higher than the SJPA.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IEFV.L and SJPA.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

IEFV.L vs. SJPA.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IEFV.L drawdown since its inception was -34.64%, smaller than the maximum SJPA.L drawdown of -45.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IEFV.L and SJPA.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	IEFV.L	SJPA.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-34.64%	-45.53%	+10.89%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.57%	-10.71%	+0.14%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.02%	-19.68%	+4.66%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-16.16%	-19.68%	+3.52%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-34.64%	-24.73%	-9.91%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.39%	-0.82%	+0.43%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.20%	-15.72%	+9.52%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.90%	3.31%	-0.41%

Volatility

IEFV.L vs. SJPA.L - Volatility Comparison

iShares Edge MSCI Europe Value Factor UCITS ETF (IEFV.L) and iShares Core MSCI Japan IMI UCITS ETF (SJPA.L) have volatilities of 4.41% and 4.41%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	IEFV.L	SJPA.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.41%	4.41%	0.00%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.07%	14.72%	-3.65%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.57%	17.89%	-4.32%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.11%	20.67%	-3.56%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.63%	18.47%	-0.84%

IEFV.L vs. SJPA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

IEFV.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than SJPA.L's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

IEFV.L vs. SJPA.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither IEFV.L nor SJPA.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IEFV.L and SJPA.L in my portfolio?

IEFV.L and SJPA.L have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, IEFV.L or SJPA.L?

On fees, SJPA.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, IEFV.L or SJPA.L?

SJPA.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for IEFV.L.

What is the main difference between IEFV.L and SJPA.L?

IEFV.L is categorized as Europe Equities, while SJPA.L is Japan Equities. IEFV.L tracks MSCI Europe Value NR EUR, while SJPA.L tracks TOPIX TR JPY. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for IEFV.L and 0.15% for SJPA.L.