IEFQ.L vs. XDEM.L
IEFQ.L (iShares Edge MSCIope Quality Factor UCITS) and XDEM.L (Xtrackers MSCI World Momentum Factor UCITS ETF 1C) are both exchange-traded funds - IEFQ.L is a Europe Equities fund tracking the MSCI Europe NR EUR, while XDEM.L is a Momentum fund tracking the MSCI World Momentum Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IEFQ.L returned 8.84%/yr vs 16.78%/yr for XDEM.L. A 0.71 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.25% expense ratio.
Performance
IEFQ.L vs. XDEM.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IEFQ.L achieves a 3.66% return, which is significantly lower than XDEM.L's 22.38% return. Over the past 10 years, IEFQ.L has underperformed XDEM.L with an annualized return of 8.84%, while XDEM.L has yielded a comparatively higher 16.78% annualized return.
IEFQ.L
- 1D
- 0.91%
- 1M
- 1.52%
- YTD
- 3.66%
- 6M
- 4.93%
- 1Y
- 9.60%
- 3Y*
- 7.89%
- 5Y*
- 6.05%
- 10Y*
- 8.84%
XDEM.L
- 1D
- -0.65%
- 1M
- 9.10%
- YTD
- 22.38%
- 6M
- 22.80%
- 1Y
- 35.27%
- 3Y*
- 26.31%
- 5Y*
- 14.93%
- 10Y*
- 16.78%
IEFQ.L vs. XDEM.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IEFQ.L iShares Edge MSCIope Quality Factor UCITS | 3.66% | 14.94% | -0.69% | 12.31% | -6.34% | 18.16% | 6.81% | 24.09% | -5.79% | 14.92% |
XDEM.L Xtrackers MSCI World Momentum Factor UCITS ETF 1C | 22.38% | 12.52% | 32.87% | 5.88% | -8.06% | 15.61% | 24.14% | 23.37% | 2.28% | 20.40% |
Correlation
The correlation between IEFQ.L and XDEM.L is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 20, 2015 | 0.71 |
The correlation between IEFQ.L and XDEM.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.53 (1 year) to 0.71 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
IEFQ.L vs. XDEM.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IEFQ.L
XDEM.L
Financial Services
Industrials
Healthcare
Technology
Consumer Defensive
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
Energy
Utilities
Communication Services
Real Estate
Financial Services
IEFQ.L
XDEM.L
Industrials
IEFQ.L
XDEM.L
Healthcare
IEFQ.L
XDEM.L
Technology
IEFQ.L
XDEM.L
Consumer Defensive
IEFQ.L
XDEM.L
Consumer Cyclical
IEFQ.L
XDEM.L
Basic Materials
IEFQ.L
XDEM.L
Energy
IEFQ.L
XDEM.L
Utilities
IEFQ.L
XDEM.L
Communication Services
IEFQ.L
XDEM.L
Real Estate
IEFQ.L
XDEM.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IEFQ.L vs. XDEM.L — Risk / Return Rank
IEFQ.L
XDEM.L
IEFQ.L vs. XDEM.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Edge MSCIope Quality Factor UCITS (IEFQ.L) and Xtrackers MSCI World Momentum Factor UCITS ETF 1C (XDEM.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IEFQ.L | XDEM.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.34 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.00 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 1.40 | -0.24 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.99 | 3.90 | -2.91 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.18 | 15.18 | -12.01 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IEFQ.L | XDEM.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.84 | 2.17 | -1.34 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.45 | 0.91 | -0.46 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.62 | 1.00 | -0.38 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.60 | 0.97 | -0.37 |
Drawdowns
IEFQ.L vs. XDEM.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IEFQ.L drawdown since its inception was -26.38%, which is greater than XDEM.L's maximum drawdown of -22.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IEFQ.L and XDEM.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IEFQ.L | XDEM.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -26.38% | -22.42% | -3.96% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.67% | -9.01% | -0.66% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -11.47% | -19.99% | +8.52% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.73% | -20.13% | +2.40% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -26.38% | -22.42% | -3.96% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.33% | -0.65% | -2.68% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.00% | -4.99% | +0.99% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.02% | 2.32% | +0.70% |
Volatility
IEFQ.L vs. XDEM.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Edge MSCIope Quality Factor UCITS (IEFQ.L) is 3.63%, while Xtrackers MSCI World Momentum Factor UCITS ETF 1C (XDEM.L) has a volatility of 5.84%. This indicates that IEFQ.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XDEM.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IEFQ.L | XDEM.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.63% | 5.84% | -2.21% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.39% | 13.78% | -4.39% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.46% | 16.17% | -4.71% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.52% | 16.41% | -2.89% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.26% | 16.80% | -2.54% |
IEFQ.L vs. XDEM.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both IEFQ.L and XDEM.L have an expense ratio of 0.25%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
IEFQ.L vs. XDEM.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither IEFQ.L nor XDEM.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
IEFQ.L and XDEM.L have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.25% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IEFQ.L and XDEM.L have the same expense ratio: 0.25% per year.
IEFQ.L is categorized as Europe Equities, while XDEM.L is Momentum. IEFQ.L tracks MSCI Europe NR EUR, while XDEM.L tracks MSCI World Momentum Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and DWS.
Find the right allocation for IEFQ.L and XDEM.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer