IEFQ.L vs. LCPE.L
IEFQ.L (iShares Edge MSCIope Quality Factor UCITS) and LCPE.L (Ossiam Shiller Barclays Cape Europe Sector Value TR UCITS) are both Europe Equities funds tracking the MSCI Europe NR EUR, from iShares and Natixis respectively. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IEFQ.L returned 8.84%/yr vs 10.16%/yr for LCPE.L. At a 0.40 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. IEFQ.L charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for LCPE.L.
Performance
IEFQ.L vs. LCPE.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IEFQ.L achieves a 3.66% return, which is significantly lower than LCPE.L's 14.20% return. Over the past 10 years, IEFQ.L has underperformed LCPE.L with an annualized return of 8.84%, while LCPE.L has yielded a comparatively higher 10.16% annualized return.
IEFQ.L
- 1D
- 0.91%
- 1M
- 1.52%
- YTD
- 3.66%
- 6M
- 4.93%
- 1Y
- 9.60%
- 3Y*
- 7.89%
- 5Y*
- 6.05%
- 10Y*
- 8.84%
LCPE.L
- 1D
- 0.39%
- 1M
- 3.01%
- YTD
- 14.20%
- 6M
- 14.45%
- 1Y
- 27.63%
- 3Y*
- 11.83%
- 5Y*
- 9.64%
- 10Y*
- 10.16%
IEFQ.L vs. LCPE.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IEFQ.L iShares Edge MSCIope Quality Factor UCITS | 3.66% | 14.94% | -0.69% | 12.31% | -6.34% | 18.16% | 6.81% | 24.09% | -5.79% | 14.92% |
LCPE.L Ossiam Shiller Barclays Cape Europe Sector Value TR UCITS | 14.20% | 18.88% | -2.83% | 10.70% | 0.29% | 16.28% | 8.38% | 12.94% | -2.26% | 9.54% |
Correlation
The correlation between IEFQ.L and LCPE.L is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 17, 2015 | 0.40 |
Over the past year, IEFQ.L and LCPE.L have become more correlated (0.71) than their long-term average of 0.40, meaning their price movements have been converging.
IEFQ.L vs. LCPE.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IEFQ.L
LCPE.L
Financial Services
-
Industrials
Healthcare
Technology
Consumer Defensive
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
Energy
Utilities
-
Communication Services
Real Estate
Financial Services
IEFQ.L
LCPE.L
-
Industrials
IEFQ.L
LCPE.L
Healthcare
IEFQ.L
LCPE.L
Technology
IEFQ.L
LCPE.L
Consumer Defensive
IEFQ.L
LCPE.L
Consumer Cyclical
IEFQ.L
LCPE.L
Basic Materials
IEFQ.L
LCPE.L
Energy
IEFQ.L
LCPE.L
Utilities
IEFQ.L
LCPE.L
-
Communication Services
IEFQ.L
LCPE.L
Real Estate
IEFQ.L
LCPE.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IEFQ.L vs. LCPE.L — Risk / Return Rank
IEFQ.L
LCPE.L
IEFQ.L vs. LCPE.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Edge MSCIope Quality Factor UCITS (IEFQ.L) and Ossiam Shiller Barclays Cape Europe Sector Value TR UCITS (LCPE.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IEFQ.L | LCPE.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.61 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.27 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 1.43 | -0.28 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.99 | 4.13 | -3.14 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.18 | 13.66 | -10.48 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IEFQ.L | LCPE.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.84 | 2.44 | -1.61 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.45 | 1.04 | -0.59 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.62 | 1.20 | -0.58 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.60 | 0.98 | -0.39 |
Drawdowns
IEFQ.L vs. LCPE.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IEFQ.L drawdown since its inception was -26.38%, roughly equal to the maximum LCPE.L drawdown of -27.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IEFQ.L and LCPE.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IEFQ.L | LCPE.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -26.38% | -27.05% | +0.67% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.67% | -6.66% | -3.01% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -11.47% | -12.39% | +0.92% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.73% | -12.39% | -5.34% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -26.38% | -27.05% | +0.67% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.33% | -2.71% | -0.62% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.00% | -3.52% | -0.48% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.02% | 2.02% | +1.00% |
Volatility
IEFQ.L vs. LCPE.L - Volatility Comparison
iShares Edge MSCIope Quality Factor UCITS (IEFQ.L) and Ossiam Shiller Barclays Cape Europe Sector Value TR UCITS (LCPE.L) have volatilities of 3.63% and 3.81%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IEFQ.L | LCPE.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.63% | 3.81% | -0.18% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.39% | 8.48% | +0.91% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.46% | 11.29% | +0.17% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.52% | 17.74% | -4.22% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.26% | 20.60% | -6.34% |
IEFQ.L vs. LCPE.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
IEFQ.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than LCPE.L's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
IEFQ.L vs. LCPE.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither IEFQ.L nor LCPE.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
IEFQ.L and LCPE.L have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IEFQ.L is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IEFQ.L is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for LCPE.L.
Both ETFs track MSCI Europe NR EUR. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Natixis. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for IEFQ.L and 0.65% for LCPE.L.
Find the right allocation for IEFQ.L and LCPE.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer