PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IEFQ.L vs. EUHD.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IEFQ.L vs. EUHD.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares Edge MSCIope Quality Factor UCITS (IEFQ.L) and PowerShares EURO STOXX High Dividend Low Volatility UCITS (EUHD.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IEFQ.L achieves a 3.66% return, which is significantly lower than EUHD.L's 9.29% return. Over the past 10 years, IEFQ.L has underperformed EUHD.L with an annualized return of 8.84%, while EUHD.L has yielded a comparatively higher 9.36% annualized return.


IEFQ.L

1D
0.91%
1M
1.52%
YTD
3.66%
6M
4.93%
1Y
9.60%
3Y*
7.89%
5Y*
6.05%
10Y*
8.84%

EUHD.L

1D
0.24%
1M
1.24%
YTD
9.29%
6M
11.09%
1Y
24.45%
3Y*
20.22%
5Y*
12.89%
10Y*
9.36%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IEFQ.L vs. EUHD.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IEFQ.L
iShares Edge MSCIope Quality Factor UCITS
3.66%14.94%-0.69%12.31%-6.34%18.16%6.81%24.09%-5.79%14.92%
EUHD.L
PowerShares EURO STOXX High Dividend Low Volatility UCITS
9.29%42.88%5.23%11.37%-3.26%13.30%-13.39%11.53%-7.27%13.76%

Correlation

The correlation between IEFQ.L and EUHD.L is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.58

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.65

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.68

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.74

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 11, 2016

0.74

The correlation between IEFQ.L and EUHD.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.58 (1 year) to 0.74 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

IEFQ.L vs. EUHD.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IEFQ.L
EUHD.L

Financial Services

20.6%
35.2%

Industrials

19.1%
3.8%

Healthcare

14.4%
0.0%

Technology

12.0%

-

Consumer Defensive

7.9%
3.7%

Consumer Cyclical

6.7%
10.4%

Basic Materials

5.6%
10.0%

Energy

4.9%
6.8%

Utilities

4.8%
12.1%

Communication Services

3.1%
6.3%

Real Estate

0.8%
11.6%

Financial Services

IEFQ.L
20.6%
EUHD.L
35.2%

Industrials

IEFQ.L
19.1%
EUHD.L
3.8%

Healthcare

IEFQ.L
14.4%
EUHD.L
0.0%

Technology

IEFQ.L
12.0%
EUHD.L

-

Consumer Defensive

IEFQ.L
7.9%
EUHD.L
3.7%

Consumer Cyclical

IEFQ.L
6.7%
EUHD.L
10.4%

Basic Materials

IEFQ.L
5.6%
EUHD.L
10.0%

Energy

IEFQ.L
4.9%
EUHD.L
6.8%

Utilities

IEFQ.L
4.8%
EUHD.L
12.1%

Communication Services

IEFQ.L
3.1%
EUHD.L
6.3%

Real Estate

IEFQ.L
0.8%
EUHD.L
11.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IEFQ.L vs. EUHD.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IEFQ.L
IEFQ.L Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
IEFQ.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IEFQ.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
IEFQ.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
IEFQ.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
IEFQ.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank

EUHD.L
EUHD.L Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
EUHD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EUHD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
EUHD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
EUHD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
EUHD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IEFQ.L vs. EUHD.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Edge MSCIope Quality Factor UCITS (IEFQ.L) and PowerShares EURO STOXX High Dividend Low Volatility UCITS (EUHD.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IEFQ.LEUHD.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.34

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.66

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.39

-0.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.99

3.39

-2.40

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.18

11.84

-8.66

IEFQ.L vs. EUHD.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IEFQ.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.84, which is lower than the EUHD.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IEFQ.L and EUHD.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IEFQ.LEUHD.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.84

2.18

-1.34

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.45

0.94

-0.49

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.62

0.61

+0.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.60

0.62

-0.02

Drawdowns

IEFQ.L vs. EUHD.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IEFQ.L drawdown since its inception was -26.38%, smaller than the maximum EUHD.L drawdown of -35.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IEFQ.L and EUHD.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IEFQ.LEUHD.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-26.38%

-35.97%

+9.59%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.67%

-7.17%

-2.50%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.47%

-10.52%

-0.95%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.73%

-19.82%

+2.09%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-26.38%

-35.97%

+9.59%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.33%

-2.09%

-1.24%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.00%

-5.30%

+1.30%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.02%

2.06%

+0.96%

Volatility

IEFQ.L vs. EUHD.L - Volatility Comparison

iShares Edge MSCIope Quality Factor UCITS (IEFQ.L) and PowerShares EURO STOXX High Dividend Low Volatility UCITS (EUHD.L) have volatilities of 3.63% and 3.72%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IEFQ.LEUHD.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.63%

3.72%

-0.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.39%

8.70%

+0.69%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.46%

11.18%

+0.28%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.52%

13.74%

-0.22%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.26%

15.55%

-1.29%

IEFQ.L vs. EUHD.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

IEFQ.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than EUHD.L's 0.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

IEFQ.L vs. EUHD.L - Dividend Comparison

IEFQ.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while EUHD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.95%.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
EUHD.L
PowerShares EURO STOXX High Dividend Low Volatility UCITS
3.95%4.61%5.86%5.50%5.44%4.28%3.06%4.66%4.34%3.41%3.51%
IEFQ.L
iShares Edge MSCIope Quality Factor UCITS
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


IEFQ.L and EUHD.L have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, IEFQ.L is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IEFQ.L is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for EUHD.L.

IEFQ.L tracks MSCI Europe NR EUR, while EUHD.L tracks MSCI EMU NR EUR. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for IEFQ.L and 0.30% for EUHD.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IEFQ.L and EUHD.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer