PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IEFM.L vs. R2SC.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IEFM.L vs. R2SC.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares Edge MSCI Europe Momentum Factor UCITS ETF (IEFM.L) and SPDR Russell 2000 US Small Cap UCITS ETF (R2SC.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

IEFM.L is traded in GBp, while R2SC.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the R2SC.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IEFM.L achieves a 5.20% return, which is significantly lower than R2SC.L's 19.64% return. Over the past 10 years, IEFM.L has outperformed R2SC.L with an annualized return of 11.43%, while R2SC.L has yielded a comparatively lower 10.30% annualized return.


IEFM.L

1D
-1.37%
1M
-2.25%
6M
0.87%
YTD
5.20%
1Y
16.58%
3Y*
19.60%
5Y*
11.49%
10Y*
11.43%

R2SC.L

1D
-0.12%
1M
-0.19%
6M
13.03%
YTD
19.64%
1Y
33.89%
3Y*
15.65%
5Y*
7.84%
10Y*
10.30%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IEFM.L vs. R2SC.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IEFM.L
iShares Edge MSCI Europe Momentum Factor UCITS ETF
5.20%33.05%15.03%10.37%-9.80%14.07%17.04%23.39%-9.34%15.91%
R2SC.L
SPDR Russell 2000 US Small Cap UCITS ETF
19.64%4.66%11.88%12.16%-11.55%15.87%15.73%20.67%-7.45%4.45%

Correlation

The correlation between IEFM.L and R2SC.L is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.49

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.50

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.54

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.57

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 19, 2015

0.59

The correlation between IEFM.L and R2SC.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.49 to 0.59 - a consistent structural relationship.

IEFM.L vs. R2SC.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IEFM.L
R2SC.L

Financial Services

22.9%
15.5%

Healthcare

16.3%
16.3%

Industrials

13.6%
17.9%

Technology

12.3%
19.2%

Energy

11.1%
5.3%

Utilities

10.9%
2.7%

Basic Materials

7.1%
4.7%

Communication Services

2.7%
2.5%

Consumer Defensive

2.6%
2.2%

Real Estate

0.3%
5.9%

Consumer Cyclical

0.1%
7.9%

Financial Services

IEFM.L
22.9%
R2SC.L
15.5%

Healthcare

IEFM.L
16.3%
R2SC.L
16.3%

Industrials

IEFM.L
13.6%
R2SC.L
17.9%

Technology

IEFM.L
12.3%
R2SC.L
19.2%

Energy

IEFM.L
11.1%
R2SC.L
5.3%

Utilities

IEFM.L
10.9%
R2SC.L
2.7%

Basic Materials

IEFM.L
7.1%
R2SC.L
4.7%

Communication Services

IEFM.L
2.7%
R2SC.L
2.5%

Consumer Defensive

IEFM.L
2.6%
R2SC.L
2.2%

Real Estate

IEFM.L
0.3%
R2SC.L
5.9%

Consumer Cyclical

IEFM.L
0.1%
R2SC.L
7.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IEFM.L vs. R2SC.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IEFM.L
IEFM.L Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
IEFM.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IEFM.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
IEFM.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
IEFM.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
IEFM.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank

R2SC.L
R2SC.L Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
R2SC.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
R2SC.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
R2SC.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
R2SC.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
R2SC.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IEFM.L vs. R2SC.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Edge MSCI Europe Momentum Factor UCITS ETF (IEFM.L) and SPDR Russell 2000 US Small Cap UCITS ETF (R2SC.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IEFM.LR2SC.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.95

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.17

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.33

-0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.37

3.91

-2.54

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.97

11.37

-6.40

IEFM.L vs. R2SC.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IEFM.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.00, which is lower than the R2SC.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.95. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IEFM.L and R2SC.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IEFM.L vs. R2SC.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IEFM.L drawdown since its inception was -23.88%, smaller than the maximum R2SC.L drawdown of -44.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IEFM.L and R2SC.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IEFM.LR2SC.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.88%

-44.96%

+21.08%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.05%

-8.63%

-3.42%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.95%

-30.00%

+17.05%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.33%

-30.00%

+8.67%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-23.88%

-35.03%

+11.15%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.55%

-3.67%

+0.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.01%

-13.77%

+8.76%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.33%

2.97%

+0.36%

Volatility

IEFM.L vs. R2SC.L - Volatility Comparison

iShares Edge MSCI Europe Momentum Factor UCITS ETF (IEFM.L) and SPDR Russell 2000 US Small Cap UCITS ETF (R2SC.L) have volatilities of 4.67% and 4.52%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IEFM.LR2SC.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.67%

4.52%

+0.15%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.48%

12.41%

+2.07%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.56%

17.32%

-0.76%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.67%

26.11%

-10.44%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.92%

23.82%

-7.90%

IEFM.L vs. R2SC.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

IEFM.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than R2SC.L's 0.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

IEFM.L vs. R2SC.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither IEFM.L nor R2SC.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


IEFM.L and R2SC.L have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, IEFM.L is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IEFM.L is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for R2SC.L.

IEFM.L is categorized as Momentum, while R2SC.L is Small Cap Blend Equities. IEFM.L tracks MSCI Europe Momentum Index, while R2SC.L tracks Russell 2000 TR USD. They also come from different issuers: iShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for IEFM.L and 0.30% for R2SC.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IEFM.L and R2SC.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer