PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
IEFM.L vs. MFEX.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

IEFM.L vs. MFEX.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

IEFM.L (iShares Edge MSCI Europe Momentum Factor UCITS ETF) and MFEX.L (Lyxor UCITS MSCI EMU) are both exchange-traded funds - IEFM.L is a Momentum fund tracking the MSCI Europe Momentum Index, while MFEX.L is a Europe Equities fund tracking the MSCI EMU NR EUR. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, IEFM.L returned 11.50%/yr vs 83.37%/yr for MFEX.L. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. IEFM.L charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.12%/yr for MFEX.L.

Performance

IEFM.L vs. MFEX.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares Edge MSCI Europe Momentum Factor UCITS ETF (IEFM.L) and Lyxor UCITS MSCI EMU (MFEX.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

IEFM.L is traded in GBp, while MFEX.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the MFEX.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IEFM.L achieves a 6.92% return, which is significantly lower than MFEX.L's 7.98% return.

IEFM.L

1D
-0.17%
1M
2.97%
YTD
6.92%
6M
10.23%
1Y
20.60%
3Y*
20.30%
5Y*
11.50%
10Y*
12.41%

MFEX.L

1D
0.46%
1M
4.82%
YTD
7.98%
6M
9.56%
1Y
21.18%
3Y*
16.13%
5Y*
83.37%
10Y*
—
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IEFM.L vs. MFEX.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
IEFM.L
iShares Edge MSCI Europe Momentum Factor UCITS ETF		6.92%33.05%15.03%10.37%-9.80%14.07%17.04%23.39%-13.67%
MFEX.L
Lyxor UCITS MSCI EMU		7.98%30.65%4.68%16.31%525.11%113.18%71.48%19.15%-13.18%

Correlation

The correlation between IEFM.L and MFEX.L is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.83

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.88

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.86

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 26, 2018

0.83

The correlation between IEFM.L and MFEX.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

IEFM.L vs. MFEX.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
IEFM.L
MFEX.L

Financial Services

23.3%
24.6%

Healthcare

16.0%
5.8%

Industrials

14.8%
21.4%

Utilities

12.2%
6.1%

Energy

11.2%
4.2%

Technology

8.4%
16.6%

Basic Materials

7.3%
2.8%

Consumer Defensive

3.1%
4.6%

Communication Services

3.0%
4.5%

Consumer Cyclical

0.5%
8.5%

Real Estate

0.4%
0.9%

Financial Services

IEFM.L
23.3%
MFEX.L
24.6%

Healthcare

IEFM.L
16.0%
MFEX.L
5.8%

Industrials

IEFM.L
14.8%
MFEX.L
21.4%

Utilities

IEFM.L
12.2%
MFEX.L
6.1%

Energy

IEFM.L
11.2%
MFEX.L
4.2%

Technology

IEFM.L
8.4%
MFEX.L
16.6%

Basic Materials

IEFM.L
7.3%
MFEX.L
2.8%

Consumer Defensive

IEFM.L
3.1%
MFEX.L
4.6%

Communication Services

IEFM.L
3.0%
MFEX.L
4.5%

Consumer Cyclical

IEFM.L
0.5%
MFEX.L
8.5%

Real Estate

IEFM.L
0.4%
MFEX.L
0.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

iShares Edge MSCI Europe Momentum Factor UCITS ETF

Lyxor UCITS MSCI EMU

Often compared with IEFM.L:
IEFM.L vs. MTUMIEFM.L vs. VUKE.DEIEFM.L vs. CEMR.DEIEFM.L vs. EXO.ASIEFM.L vs. SPYF.DEIEFM.L vs. QDVX.DEIEFM.L vs. ESIF.L
Often compared with MFEX.L:
MFEX.L vs. MEIKXMFEX.L vs. ACWIMFEX.L vs. 100D.LMFEX.L vs. 500G.LMFEX.L vs. ACWL.LMFEX.L vs. LDEG.LMFEX.L vs. 500U.L

Return for Risk

IEFM.L vs. MFEX.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
IEFM.L
IEFM.L Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
IEFM.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IEFM.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
IEFM.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
IEFM.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
IEFM.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank
MFEX.L
MFEX.L Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
MFEX.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MFEX.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
MFEX.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
MFEX.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
MFEX.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IEFM.L vs. MFEX.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Edge MSCI Europe Momentum Factor UCITS ETF (IEFM.L) and Lyxor UCITS MSCI EMU (MFEX.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

IEFM.LMFEX.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
0.82
1.51

-0.69

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
1.35
2.17

-0.81

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.28

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.46

1.92

-0.46

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.55

6.75

-3.20

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

IEFM.L vs. MFEX.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IEFM.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.82, which is lower than the MFEX.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IEFM.L and MFEX.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

IEFM.LMFEX.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.82

1.51

-0.69

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.64

0.32

+0.32

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.73

—

—

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.68

0.29

+0.39

Drawdowns

IEFM.L vs. MFEX.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IEFM.L drawdown since its inception was -23.88%, smaller than the maximum MFEX.L drawdown of -31.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IEFM.L and MFEX.L.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

IEFM.LMFEX.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.88%

-31.42%

+7.54%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.04%

-10.99%

-3.05%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.04%

-12.95%

-1.09%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.33%

-20.63%

-0.70%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-23.88%

—

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.75%

-0.06%

-1.69%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.23%

-5.13%

-0.10%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.79%

3.13%

+2.66%

Volatility

IEFM.L vs. MFEX.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Edge MSCI Europe Momentum Factor UCITS ETF (IEFM.L) is 3.99%, while Lyxor UCITS MSCI EMU (MFEX.L) has a volatility of 4.53%. This indicates that IEFM.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MFEX.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

IEFM.LMFEX.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.99%

4.53%

-0.54%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.91%

11.46%

+2.45%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.98%

13.97%

+11.01%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.82%

257.72%

-239.90%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.03%

207.66%

-190.63%

IEFM.L vs. MFEX.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

IEFM.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than MFEX.L's 0.12% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

IEFM.L vs. MFEX.L - Dividend Comparison

IEFM.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MFEX.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.02%.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
IEFM.L
iShares Edge MSCI Europe Momentum Factor UCITS ETF		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
MFEX.L
Lyxor UCITS MSCI EMU		3.02%3.27%2.82%2.56%87.78%48.73%40.59%3.30%0.44%

Frequently Asked Questions

IEFM.L and MFEX.L have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, MFEX.L is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

MFEX.L is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for IEFM.L.

IEFM.L is categorized as Momentum, while MFEX.L is Europe Equities. IEFM.L tracks MSCI Europe Momentum Index, while MFEX.L tracks MSCI EMU NR EUR. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for IEFM.L and 0.12% for MFEX.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IEFM.L and MFEX.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer