PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
IEEM.L vs. TDGB.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

IEEM.L vs. TDGB.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

IEEM.L (iShares MSCI EM UCITS ETF (Dist)) and TDGB.L (VanEck Morningstar Developed Markets Dividend Leaders UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IEEM.L is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the MSCI EM NR USD, while TDGB.L is a Global Equities fund tracking the Morningstar Developed Markets Large Cap Dividend Leaders Screened Select Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, IEEM.L returned 9.24%/yr vs 17.70%/yr for TDGB.L. A 0.51 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IEEM.L charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.38%/yr for TDGB.L.

Performance

IEEM.L vs. TDGB.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares MSCI EM UCITS ETF (Dist) (IEEM.L) and VanEck Morningstar Developed Markets Dividend Leaders UCITS ETF (TDGB.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

IEEM.L is traded in GBp, while TDGB.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the TDGB.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IEEM.L achieves a 25.90% return, which is significantly higher than TDGB.L's 8.92% return.

IEEM.L

1D
-1.34%
1M
6.63%
YTD
25.90%
6M
28.05%
1Y
55.14%
3Y*
21.65%
5Y*
9.24%
10Y*
11.54%

TDGB.L

1D
0.48%
1M
0.92%
YTD
8.92%
6M
11.81%
1Y
29.32%
3Y*
20.13%
5Y*
17.70%
10Y*
—
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IEEM.L vs. TDGB.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
IEEM.L
iShares MSCI EM UCITS ETF (Dist)		25.90%26.66%9.88%3.86%-9.90%-1.38%15.96%8.26%
TDGB.L
VanEck Morningstar Developed Markets Dividend Leaders UCITS ETF		8.92%30.88%10.65%9.06%22.49%19.59%-5.61%10.74%

Correlation

The correlation between IEEM.L and TDGB.L is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.14

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.38

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.41

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 21, 2019

0.51

Over the past year, the correlation between IEEM.L and TDGB.L has dropped to 0.14 - well below their long-term average of 0.51, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

IEEM.L vs. TDGB.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
IEEM.L
TDGB.L

Technology

36.8%
0.3%

Financial Services

19.5%
31.7%

Consumer Cyclical

9.5%
3.8%

Industrials

7.5%
3.9%

Communication Services

6.9%
8.7%

Basic Materials

6.5%
1.2%

Energy

4.1%
19.7%

Consumer Defensive

3.0%
10.1%

Healthcare

2.9%
14.4%

Utilities

2.1%
6.2%

Real Estate

1.1%
0.0%

Technology

IEEM.L
36.8%
TDGB.L
0.3%

Financial Services

IEEM.L
19.5%
TDGB.L
31.7%

Consumer Cyclical

IEEM.L
9.5%
TDGB.L
3.8%

Industrials

IEEM.L
7.5%
TDGB.L
3.9%

Communication Services

IEEM.L
6.9%
TDGB.L
8.7%

Basic Materials

IEEM.L
6.5%
TDGB.L
1.2%

Energy

IEEM.L
4.1%
TDGB.L
19.7%

Consumer Defensive

IEEM.L
3.0%
TDGB.L
10.1%

Healthcare

IEEM.L
2.9%
TDGB.L
14.4%

Utilities

IEEM.L
2.1%
TDGB.L
6.2%

Real Estate

IEEM.L
1.1%
TDGB.L
0.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

iShares MSCI EM UCITS ETF (Dist)

VanEck Morningstar Developed Markets Dividend Leaders UCITS ETF

Often compared with IEEM.L:
IEEM.L vs. EIMI.LIEEM.L vs. VFEM.DEIEEM.L vs. HMEF.LIEEM.L vs. ISP6.LIEEM.L vs. 36B5.DEIEEM.L vs. VFEG.LIEEM.L vs. VOO
Often compared with TDGB.L:
TDGB.L vs. VHYL.ASTDGB.L vs. SCHDTDGB.L vs. SPYDTDGB.L vs. LDEG.LTDGB.L vs. VHYD.LTDGB.L vs. JEGP.LTDGB.L vs. CSKR.L

Return for Risk

IEEM.L vs. TDGB.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
IEEM.L
IEEM.L Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
IEEM.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IEEM.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
IEEM.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
IEEM.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
IEEM.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
TDGB.L
TDGB.L Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
TDGB.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TDGB.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
TDGB.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
TDGB.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
TDGB.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IEEM.L vs. TDGB.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI EM UCITS ETF (Dist) (IEEM.L) and VanEck Morningstar Developed Markets Dividend Leaders UCITS ETF (TDGB.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

IEEM.LTDGB.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
3.23
3.15

+0.08

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
4.13
4.38

-0.26

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.60

1.59

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.93

6.26

-1.32

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.58

20.72

-3.13

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

IEEM.L vs. TDGB.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IEEM.L Sharpe Ratio is 3.23, which is comparable to the TDGB.L Sharpe Ratio of 3.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IEEM.L and TDGB.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

IEEM.LTDGB.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.23

3.15

+0.08

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.57

1.55

-0.98

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.64

—

—

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.41

0.98

-0.57

Drawdowns

IEEM.L vs. TDGB.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IEEM.L drawdown since its inception was -53.22%, which is greater than TDGB.L's maximum drawdown of -29.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IEEM.L and TDGB.L.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

IEEM.LTDGB.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-53.22%

-29.60%

-23.62%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.12%

-4.66%

-6.46%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.47%

-12.41%

-3.06%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.27%

-12.41%

-10.86%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-26.63%

—

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.43%

-1.47%

-0.96%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.41%

-3.70%

-6.71%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.13%

1.41%

+1.72%

Volatility

IEEM.L vs. TDGB.L - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI EM UCITS ETF (Dist) (IEEM.L) has a higher volatility of 7.42% compared to VanEck Morningstar Developed Markets Dividend Leaders UCITS ETF (TDGB.L) at 2.49%. This indicates that IEEM.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TDGB.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

IEEM.LTDGB.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.42%

2.49%

+4.93%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.55%

7.01%

+7.54%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.03%

9.28%

+7.75%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.32%

11.42%

+4.90%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.11%

14.44%

+3.67%

IEEM.L vs. TDGB.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

IEEM.L has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than TDGB.L's 0.38% expense ratio.

Dividends

IEEM.L vs. TDGB.L - Dividend Comparison

IEEM.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.01%, less than TDGB.L's 3.20% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IEEM.L
iShares MSCI EM UCITS ETF (Dist)		2.01%2.48%2.86%2.91%3.40%2.74%1.98%2.32%2.51%1.86%2.09%3.38%
TDGB.L
VanEck Morningstar Developed Markets Dividend Leaders UCITS ETF		3.20%3.50%4.27%4.93%4.40%4.06%4.16%4.52%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

IEEM.L and TDGB.L have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, IEEM.L is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IEEM.L is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.38% for TDGB.L.

IEEM.L is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while TDGB.L is Global Equities. IEEM.L tracks MSCI EM NR USD, while TDGB.L tracks Morningstar Developed Markets Large Cap Dividend Leaders Screened Select Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for IEEM.L and 0.38% for TDGB.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IEEM.L and TDGB.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer