IEEM.L vs. MKUW.L
IEEM.L (iShares MSCI EM UCITS ETF (Dist)) and MKUW.L (Invesco MSCI Kuwait UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) are both Emerging Markets Equities funds - IEEM.L tracks the MSCI EM NR USD while MKUW.L tracks the MSCI Kuwait 20/35 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, IEEM.L returned 6.83%/yr vs 7.68%/yr for MKUW.L. At a 0.14 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. IEEM.L charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for MKUW.L.
Performance
IEEM.L vs. MKUW.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
IEEM.L is traded in GBp, while MKUW.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the MKUW.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IEEM.L achieves a 15.36% return, which is significantly higher than MKUW.L's 0.30% return.
IEEM.L
- 1D
- -1.90%
- 1M
- -10.32%
- 6M
- 9.18%
- YTD
- 15.36%
- 1Y
- 30.46%
- 3Y*
- 17.70%
- 5Y*
- 6.83%
- 10Y*
- 8.31%
MKUW.L
- 1D
- 0.11%
- 1M
- -3.24%
- 6M
- 0.60%
- YTD
- 0.30%
- 1Y
- 3.15%
- 3Y*
- 6.77%
- 5Y*
- 7.68%
- 10Y*
- —
IEEM.L vs. MKUW.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IEEM.L iShares MSCI EM UCITS ETF (Dist) | 15.36% | 25.76% | 9.15% | 3.25% | -10.39% | -2.10% | 15.38% | 4.58% |
MKUW.L Invesco MSCI Kuwait UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 0.30% | 16.42% | 11.06% | -13.43% | 18.60% | 29.79% | -12.53% | 6.74% |
Correlation
The correlation between IEEM.L and MKUW.L is 0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.06 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 25, 2019 | 0.14 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IEEM.L vs. MKUW.L — Risk / Return Rank
IEEM.L
MKUW.L
IEEM.L vs. MKUW.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI EM UCITS ETF (Dist) (IEEM.L) and Invesco MSCI Kuwait UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (MKUW.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IEEM.L | MKUW.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.26 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.60 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.05 | +0.23 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.37 | 0.36 | +2.01 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.74 | 0.94 | +6.81 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IEEM.L vs. MKUW.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IEEM.L drawdown since its inception was -53.80%, which is greater than MKUW.L's maximum drawdown of -33.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IEEM.L and MKUW.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IEEM.L | MKUW.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -53.80% | -33.94% | -19.86% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.82% | -8.77% | -4.05% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.56% | -9.57% | -5.99% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.93% | -25.75% | +3.82% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -27.50% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.82% | -3.24% | -9.58% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.41% | -10.63% | -0.78% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.92% | 3.35% | +0.57% |
Volatility
IEEM.L vs. MKUW.L - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI EM UCITS ETF (Dist) (IEEM.L) has a higher volatility of 8.69% compared to Invesco MSCI Kuwait UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (MKUW.L) at 2.44%. This indicates that IEEM.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MKUW.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IEEM.L | MKUW.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.69% | 2.44% | +6.25% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.84% | 9.20% | +8.64% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.88% | 11.72% | +8.16% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.95% | 14.38% | +2.57% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.33% | 17.70% | +0.63% |
IEEM.L vs. MKUW.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
IEEM.L has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than MKUW.L's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
IEEM.L vs. MKUW.L - Dividend Comparison
IEEM.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.63%, while MKUW.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IEEM.L iShares MSCI EM UCITS ETF (Dist) | 1.63% | 1.84% | 2.22% | 2.32% | 2.84% | 2.00% | 1.54% | 1.84% | 1.91% | 1.42% | 1.56% | 2.20% |
MKUW.L Invesco MSCI Kuwait UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IEEM.L and MKUW.L have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IEEM.L is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IEEM.L is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for MKUW.L.
IEEM.L tracks MSCI EM NR USD, while MKUW.L tracks MSCI Kuwait 20/35 Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for IEEM.L and 0.50% for MKUW.L.
Find the right allocation for IEEM.L and MKUW.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer