IEEM.L vs. IEF
IEEM.L (iShares MSCI EM UCITS ETF (Dist)) and IEF (iShares 7-10 Year Treasury Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IEEM.L is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the MSCI EM NR USD, while IEF is a Government Bonds fund tracking the ICE U.S. Treasury 7-10 Year Bond Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IEEM.L returned 11.54%/yr vs 1.48%/yr for IEF. At a correlation of -0.05, they often move in opposite directions. IEEM.L charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for IEF.
Performance
IEEM.L vs. IEF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
IEEM.L is traded in GBp, while IEF is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the IEF values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IEEM.L achieves a 25.90% return, which is significantly higher than IEF's -0.06% return. Over the past 10 years, IEEM.L has outperformed IEF with an annualized return of 11.54%, while IEF has yielded a comparatively lower 1.48% annualized return.
IEEM.L
- 1D
- -1.34%
- 1M
- 3.99%
- YTD
- 25.90%
- 6M
- 26.73%
- 1Y
- 54.02%
- 3Y*
- 21.65%
- 5Y*
- 9.24%
- 10Y*
- 11.54%
IEF
- 1D
- 0.09%
- 1M
- 0.75%
- YTD
- -0.06%
- 6M
- -1.12%
- 1Y
- 5.00%
- 3Y*
- -0.08%
- 5Y*
- -0.03%
- 10Y*
- 1.48%
IEEM.L vs. IEF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IEEM.L iShares MSCI EM UCITS ETF (Dist) | 25.90% | 26.66% | 9.88% | 3.86% | -9.90% | -1.38% | 15.96% | 12.64% | -9.08% | 25.04% |
IEF iShares 7-10 Year Treasury Bond ETF | -0.06% | 0.34% | 1.10% | -1.54% | -5.07% | -2.41% | 6.78% | 3.92% | 6.98% | -6.31% |
Correlation
The correlation between IEEM.L and IEF is -0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.02 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.01 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.05 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.03 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 4, 2007 | -0.05 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IEEM.L vs. IEF — Risk / Return Rank
IEEM.L
IEF
IEEM.L vs. IEF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI EM UCITS ETF (Dist) (IEEM.L) and iShares 7-10 Year Treasury Bond ETF (IEF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IEEM.L | IEF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.47 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.96 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.60 | 1.14 | +0.46 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.93 | 0.82 | +4.12 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 17.58 | 2.03 | +15.55 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IEEM.L | IEF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.23 | 0.75 | +2.47 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.57 | -0.00 | +0.57 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.64 | 0.14 | +0.50 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.41 | 0.48 | -0.07 |
Drawdowns
IEEM.L vs. IEF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IEEM.L drawdown since its inception was -53.22%, which is greater than IEF's maximum drawdown of -26.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IEEM.L and IEF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IEEM.L | IEF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -53.22% | -26.56% | -26.66% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.12% | -6.12% | -5.00% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.47% | -7.75% | -7.72% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.27% | -16.26% | -7.01% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -26.63% | -26.56% | -0.07% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.43% | -21.64% | +19.21% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.41% | -11.03% | +0.62% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.13% | 2.46% | +0.67% |
Volatility
IEEM.L vs. IEF - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI EM UCITS ETF (Dist) (IEEM.L) has a higher volatility of 7.42% compared to iShares 7-10 Year Treasury Bond ETF (IEF) at 1.45%. This indicates that IEEM.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IEF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IEEM.L | IEF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.42% | 1.45% | +5.97% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.55% | 5.07% | +9.48% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.03% | 6.67% | +10.36% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.32% | 9.68% | +6.64% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.11% | 10.74% | +7.37% |
IEEM.L vs. IEF - Expense Ratio Comparison
IEEM.L has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is higher than IEF's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
IEEM.L vs. IEF - Dividend Comparison
IEEM.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.01%, less than IEF's 3.92% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IEEM.L iShares MSCI EM UCITS ETF (Dist) | 2.01% | 2.48% | 2.86% | 2.91% | 3.40% | 2.74% | 1.98% | 2.32% | 2.51% | 1.86% | 2.09% | 3.38% |
IEF iShares 7-10 Year Treasury Bond ETF | 3.92% | 3.77% | 3.62% | 2.91% | 1.96% | 0.83% | 1.08% | 2.08% | 2.24% | 1.82% | 1.81% | 1.90% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IEEM.L and IEF have a correlation of -0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IEF is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IEF is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for IEEM.L.
IEEM.L is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while IEF is Government Bonds. IEEM.L tracks MSCI EM NR USD, while IEF tracks ICE U.S. Treasury 7-10 Year Bond Index. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for IEEM.L and 0.15% for IEF.
Find the right allocation for IEEM.L and IEF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer