PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IEDY.L vs. CSP1.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IEDY.L vs. CSP1.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares EM Dividend UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (IEDY.L) and iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF (CSP1.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

IEDY.L is traded in USD, while CSP1.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the CSP1.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IEDY.L achieves a 9.51% return, which is significantly lower than CSP1.L's 10.64% return. Over the past 10 years, IEDY.L has underperformed CSP1.L with an annualized return of 6.30%, while CSP1.L has yielded a comparatively higher 15.00% annualized return.


IEDY.L

1D
0.11%
1M
-2.31%
6M
4.97%
YTD
9.51%
1Y
22.53%
3Y*
18.74%
5Y*
4.86%
10Y*
6.30%

CSP1.L

1D
0.64%
1M
0.52%
6M
10.36%
YTD
10.64%
1Y
22.24%
3Y*
20.23%
5Y*
13.16%
10Y*
15.00%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IEDY.L vs. CSP1.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IEDY.L
iShares EM Dividend UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
9.51%27.60%7.02%19.23%-30.77%11.02%-2.56%13.94%-5.15%25.92%
CSP1.L
iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF
10.64%17.63%25.22%26.11%-18.77%29.88%17.14%31.49%-5.65%21.38%

Correlation

The correlation between IEDY.L and CSP1.L is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.45

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.47

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.50

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.53

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 25, 2011

0.56

The correlation between IEDY.L and CSP1.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.45 (1 year) to 0.56 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IEDY.L vs. CSP1.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IEDY.L
IEDY.L Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
IEDY.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IEDY.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
IEDY.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
IEDY.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
IEDY.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank

CSP1.L
CSP1.L Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
CSP1.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CSP1.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
CSP1.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
CSP1.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
CSP1.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IEDY.L vs. CSP1.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares EM Dividend UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (IEDY.L) and iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF (CSP1.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IEDY.LCSP1.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.35

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.61

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.33

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.48

2.55

-0.07

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.27

10.42

-3.14

IEDY.L vs. CSP1.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IEDY.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.55, which is comparable to the CSP1.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IEDY.L and CSP1.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IEDY.L vs. CSP1.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IEDY.L drawdown since its inception was -48.42%, which is greater than CSP1.L's maximum drawdown of -33.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IEDY.L and CSP1.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IEDY.LCSP1.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-48.42%

-33.51%

-14.91%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.00%

-8.68%

-0.32%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.34%

-19.33%

+4.99%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-41.24%

-25.16%

-16.08%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.24%

-33.51%

-7.73%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.04%

-0.22%

-4.82%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.43%

-4.07%

-11.36%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.07%

2.13%

+0.94%

Volatility

IEDY.L vs. CSP1.L - Volatility Comparison

iShares EM Dividend UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (IEDY.L) has a higher volatility of 4.04% compared to iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF (CSP1.L) at 3.12%. This indicates that IEDY.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CSP1.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IEDY.LCSP1.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.04%

3.12%

+0.92%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.98%

8.66%

+3.32%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.37%

11.64%

+2.73%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.26%

20.99%

-3.73%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.36%

18.84%

-0.48%

IEDY.L vs. CSP1.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

IEDY.L has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than CSP1.L's 0.07% expense ratio.


Dividends

IEDY.L vs. CSP1.L - Dividend Comparison

IEDY.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.09%, while CSP1.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CSP1.L
iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
IEDY.L
iShares EM Dividend UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
5.09%5.72%7.94%7.91%9.38%6.57%4.79%5.59%5.69%3.96%4.59%6.51%

Frequently Asked Questions


IEDY.L and CSP1.L have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, CSP1.L is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

CSP1.L is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for IEDY.L.

IEDY.L is categorized as Dividend, while CSP1.L is S&P 500. IEDY.L tracks iShares EM Dividend UCITS ETF USD (Dist), while CSP1.L tracks S&P 500 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for IEDY.L and 0.07% for CSP1.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IEDY.L and CSP1.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer