PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IEDL.L vs. IWDA.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IEDL.L vs. IWDA.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares Edge MSCI Europe Value Factor UCITS ETF EUR (Dist) (IEDL.L) and iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IWDA.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

IEDL.L is traded in EUR, while IWDA.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the IWDA.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IEDL.L achieves a 14.13% return, which is significantly higher than IWDA.L's 11.03% return.


IEDL.L

1D
-0.48%
1M
4.00%
YTD
14.13%
6M
18.09%
1Y
33.31%
3Y*
21.46%
5Y*
14.48%
10Y*

IWDA.L

1D
-0.32%
1M
4.72%
YTD
11.03%
6M
11.69%
1Y
23.88%
3Y*
17.60%
5Y*
12.88%
10Y*
12.92%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IEDL.L vs. IWDA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
IEDL.L
iShares Edge MSCI Europe Value Factor UCITS ETF EUR (Dist)
14.13%35.00%10.46%13.50%-3.75%26.71%-8.76%21.78%-12.14%
IWDA.L
iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
11.03%6.67%26.97%20.54%-13.04%31.33%6.49%30.00%-4.78%

Correlation

The correlation between IEDL.L and IWDA.L is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.66

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.59

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.65

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 28, 2018

0.69

The correlation between IEDL.L and IWDA.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.59 (3 years) to 0.69 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

IEDL.L vs. IWDA.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IEDL.L
IWDA.L

Financial Services

22.6%
14.9%

Industrials

17.0%
9.7%

Healthcare

12.3%
8.6%

Technology

12.2%
32.9%

Consumer Defensive

8.6%
4.8%

Basic Materials

6.2%
2.8%

Consumer Cyclical

6.2%
8.8%

Energy

5.1%
3.9%

Utilities

4.5%
2.4%

Communication Services

3.7%
9.3%

Real Estate

0.6%
1.2%

Financial Services

IEDL.L
22.6%
IWDA.L
14.9%

Industrials

IEDL.L
17.0%
IWDA.L
9.7%

Healthcare

IEDL.L
12.3%
IWDA.L
8.6%

Technology

IEDL.L
12.2%
IWDA.L
32.9%

Consumer Defensive

IEDL.L
8.6%
IWDA.L
4.8%

Basic Materials

IEDL.L
6.2%
IWDA.L
2.8%

Consumer Cyclical

IEDL.L
6.2%
IWDA.L
8.8%

Energy

IEDL.L
5.1%
IWDA.L
3.9%

Utilities

IEDL.L
4.5%
IWDA.L
2.4%

Communication Services

IEDL.L
3.7%
IWDA.L
9.3%

Real Estate

IEDL.L
0.6%
IWDA.L
1.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IEDL.L vs. IWDA.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IEDL.L
IEDL.L Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
IEDL.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IEDL.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
IEDL.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
IEDL.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
IEDL.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

IWDA.L
IWDA.L Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
IWDA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IWDA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
IWDA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
IWDA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
IWDA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IEDL.L vs. IWDA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Edge MSCI Europe Value Factor UCITS ETF EUR (Dist) (IEDL.L) and iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IWDA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IEDL.LIWDA.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.47

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.53

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

1.37

+0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.42

3.73

-0.31

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.72

13.96

-1.23

IEDL.L vs. IWDA.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IEDL.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.44, which is comparable to the IWDA.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.97. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IEDL.L and IWDA.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IEDL.LIWDA.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.44

1.97

+0.47

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

0.86

+0.08

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.81

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.59

0.81

-0.22

Drawdowns

IEDL.L vs. IWDA.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IEDL.L drawdown since its inception was -39.74%, which is greater than IWDA.L's maximum drawdown of -33.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IEDL.L and IWDA.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IEDL.LIWDA.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.74%

-33.57%

-6.17%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.70%

-6.37%

-3.33%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.52%

-20.70%

+3.18%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.57%

-20.70%

+1.13%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.57%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.66%

-0.32%

-0.34%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.19%

-4.34%

-1.85%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.61%

1.71%

+0.90%

Volatility

IEDL.L vs. IWDA.L - Volatility Comparison

iShares Edge MSCI Europe Value Factor UCITS ETF EUR (Dist) (IEDL.L) has a higher volatility of 4.83% compared to iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IWDA.L) at 3.15%. This indicates that IEDL.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IWDA.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IEDL.LIWDA.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.83%

3.15%

+1.68%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.95%

8.88%

+2.07%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.60%

12.15%

+1.45%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.42%

15.02%

+0.40%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.97%

15.84%

+2.13%

IEDL.L vs. IWDA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

IEDL.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than IWDA.L's 0.20% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

IEDL.L vs. IWDA.L - Dividend Comparison

IEDL.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.01%, while IWDA.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
IEDL.L
iShares Edge MSCI Europe Value Factor UCITS ETF EUR (Dist)
3.01%3.44%4.22%4.76%4.23%3.56%2.32%3.86%3.19%
IWDA.L
iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


IEDL.L and IWDA.L have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, IWDA.L is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IWDA.L is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for IEDL.L.

IEDL.L is categorized as Europe Equities, while IWDA.L is Global Equities. IEDL.L tracks MSCI Europe Value NR EUR, while IWDA.L tracks MSCI World Index. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for IEDL.L and 0.20% for IWDA.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IEDL.L and IWDA.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer