PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IEAC.AS vs. HIGH.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IEAC.AS vs. HIGH.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares Core € Corp Bond UCITS ETF (IEAC.AS) and iShares EUR High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (HIGH.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IEAC.AS achieves a 0.58% return, which is significantly lower than HIGH.L's 1.13% return.


IEAC.AS

1D
0.10%
1M
0.75%
YTD
0.58%
6M
0.86%
1Y
1.79%
3Y*
4.59%
5Y*
0.07%
10Y*
1.02%

HIGH.L

1D
0.32%
1M
0.80%
YTD
1.13%
6M
1.62%
1Y
3.28%
3Y*
6.14%
5Y*
2.62%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IEAC.AS vs. HIGH.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IEAC.AS
iShares Core € Corp Bond UCITS ETF
0.58%3.05%4.40%7.74%-13.63%-1.02%2.55%6.29%-1.52%0.61%
HIGH.L
iShares EUR High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF EUR (Acc)
1.13%4.89%5.70%11.59%-9.32%2.82%1.10%9.76%-3.41%0.63%

Correlation

The correlation between IEAC.AS and HIGH.L is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.51

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.53

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.48

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 21, 2017

0.44

The correlation between IEAC.AS and HIGH.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.44 to 0.53 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IEAC.AS vs. HIGH.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IEAC.AS
IEAC.AS Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
IEAC.AS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IEAC.AS Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
IEAC.AS Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
IEAC.AS Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
IEAC.AS Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank

HIGH.L
HIGH.L Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
HIGH.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HIGH.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
HIGH.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
HIGH.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
HIGH.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IEAC.AS vs. HIGH.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core € Corp Bond UCITS ETF (IEAC.AS) and iShares EUR High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (HIGH.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IEAC.ASHIGH.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.20

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.38

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

1.17

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.77

1.14

-0.37

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.68

4.60

-1.91

IEAC.AS vs. HIGH.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IEAC.AS Sharpe Ratio is 0.67, which is comparable to the HIGH.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.87. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IEAC.AS and HIGH.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IEAC.AS vs. HIGH.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IEAC.AS drawdown since its inception was -17.26%, smaller than the maximum HIGH.L drawdown of -25.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IEAC.AS and HIGH.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IEAC.ASHIGH.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.26%

-25.42%

+8.16%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.65%

-2.88%

+0.23%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-2.65%

-3.65%

+1.00%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.26%

-14.64%

-2.62%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-17.26%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.99%

-0.00%

-0.99%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.73%

-2.71%

-0.02%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.76%

0.71%

+0.05%

Volatility

IEAC.AS vs. HIGH.L - Volatility Comparison

iShares Core € Corp Bond UCITS ETF (IEAC.AS) has a higher volatility of 1.15% compared to iShares EUR High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (HIGH.L) at 1.09%. This indicates that IEAC.AS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HIGH.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IEAC.ASHIGH.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.15%

1.09%

+0.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.67%

3.10%

-0.43%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.02%

3.76%

-0.74%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.42%

5.46%

-1.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.34%

7.19%

-2.85%

IEAC.AS vs. HIGH.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

IEAC.AS has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than HIGH.L's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

IEAC.AS vs. HIGH.L - Dividend Comparison

IEAC.AS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.33%, while HIGH.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HIGH.L
iShares EUR High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF EUR (Acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
IEAC.AS
iShares Core € Corp Bond UCITS ETF
3.33%3.29%3.39%2.51%0.84%0.81%0.84%1.10%0.98%1.52%1.66%0.90%

Frequently Asked Questions


IEAC.AS and HIGH.L have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, IEAC.AS is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IEAC.AS is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for HIGH.L.

IEAC.AS is categorized as Corporate Bonds, while HIGH.L is European High Yield Bonds. IEAC.AS tracks Bloomberg Euro Corporate Bond Index, while HIGH.L tracks Bloomberg Pan Euro HY Euro TR EUR. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for IEAC.AS and 0.50% for HIGH.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IEAC.AS and HIGH.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer