IDWR.L vs. QNTM
IDWR.L (iShares MSCI World UCITS) is Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI ACWI NR USD, while QNTM (Quantum BioPharma Ltd) is a stock. Over the past 5 years, IDWR.L returned 11.53%/yr vs -48.49%/yr for QNTM. At a 0.16 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
IDWR.L vs. QNTM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IDWR.L achieves a 9.72% return, which is significantly higher than QNTM's -38.63% return.
IDWR.L
- 1D
- 0.09%
- 1M
- 4.01%
- YTD
- 9.72%
- 6M
- 10.83%
- 1Y
- 25.57%
- 3Y*
- 20.43%
- 5Y*
- 11.53%
- 10Y*
- 12.75%
QNTM
- 1D
- -8.20%
- 1M
- -16.42%
- YTD
- -38.63%
- 6M
- -55.20%
- 1Y
- -69.17%
- 3Y*
- -60.64%
- 5Y*
- -48.49%
- 10Y*
- —
IDWR.L vs. QNTM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IDWR.L iShares MSCI World UCITS | 9.72% | 20.58% | 18.78% | 24.08% | -18.32% | 21.58% | 15.70% | 26.75% | -10.83% |
QNTM Quantum BioPharma Ltd | -38.63% | 98.37% | -93.84% | 16.67% | -22.71% | -34.62% | -71.27% | -87.38% | 148.84% |
Correlation
The correlation between IDWR.L and QNTM is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 11, 2018 | 0.16 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IDWR.L vs. QNTM — Risk / Return Rank
IDWR.L
QNTM
IDWR.L vs. QNTM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI World UCITS (IDWR.L) and Quantum BioPharma Ltd (QNTM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IDWR.L | QNTM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.58 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.17 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 1.00 | +0.39 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.07 | -0.74 | +3.81 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.98 | -0.99 | +13.97 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IDWR.L | QNTM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.15 | -0.43 | +2.58 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.74 | -0.36 | +1.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.80 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.46 | -0.36 | +0.82 |
Drawdowns
IDWR.L vs. QNTM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IDWR.L drawdown since its inception was -56.75%, smaller than the maximum QNTM drawdown of -99.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IDWR.L and QNTM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IDWR.L | QNTM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -56.75% | -99.98% | +43.23% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.29% | -94.00% | +85.71% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.08% | -97.98% | +80.90% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.04% | -98.42% | +72.38% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.06% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.46% | -99.95% | +99.49% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.61% | -92.23% | +82.62% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.96% | 70.16% | -68.20% |
Volatility
IDWR.L vs. QNTM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares MSCI World UCITS (IDWR.L) is 3.30%, while Quantum BioPharma Ltd (QNTM) has a volatility of 54.90%. This indicates that IDWR.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QNTM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IDWR.L | QNTM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.30% | 54.90% | -51.60% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.08% | 112.42% | -103.34% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.85% | 160.03% | -148.18% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.60% | 134.03% | -118.43% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.86% | 140.69% | -124.83% |
Dividends
IDWR.L vs. QNTM - Dividend Comparison
IDWR.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.85%, while QNTM has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IDWR.L iShares MSCI World UCITS | 0.85% | 0.93% | 1.08% | 1.29% | 1.46% | 1.05% | 1.14% | 1.61% | 1.87% | 1.58% | 1.77% | 1.83% |
QNTM Quantum BioPharma Ltd | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IDWR.L and QNTM have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for IDWR.L and QNTM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer