PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IDWR.L vs. PRWU.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IDWR.L vs. PRWU.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI World UCITS (IDWR.L) and Amundi Prime Global UCITS ETF DR (C) (PRWU.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


IDWR.L

1D
0.09%
1M
4.01%
YTD
9.72%
6M
10.83%
1Y
25.57%
3Y*
20.43%
5Y*
11.53%
10Y*
12.75%

PRWU.L

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IDWR.L vs. PRWU.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
IDWR.L
iShares MSCI World UCITS
9.72%20.58%18.78%24.08%2.83%
PRWU.L
Amundi Prime Global UCITS ETF DR (C)
0.00%0.00%19.27%24.47%2.98%

Correlation

The correlation between IDWR.L and PRWU.L is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.63

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 14, 2022

0.73

The correlation between IDWR.L and PRWU.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.63 (3 years) to 0.73 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

IDWR.L vs. PRWU.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IDWR.L
PRWU.L

Technology

31.0%
27.0%

Financial Services

15.1%
15.8%

Industrials

10.5%
9.9%

Consumer Cyclical

9.1%
10.5%

Communication Services

8.9%
8.1%

Healthcare

8.5%
10.7%

Consumer Defensive

5.0%
6.1%

Energy

3.9%
4.0%

Basic Materials

3.2%
3.2%

Utilities

2.6%
2.7%

Real Estate

1.6%
2.1%

Technology

IDWR.L
31.0%
PRWU.L
27.0%

Financial Services

IDWR.L
15.1%
PRWU.L
15.8%

Industrials

IDWR.L
10.5%
PRWU.L
9.9%

Consumer Cyclical

IDWR.L
9.1%
PRWU.L
10.5%

Communication Services

IDWR.L
8.9%
PRWU.L
8.1%

Healthcare

IDWR.L
8.5%
PRWU.L
10.7%

Consumer Defensive

IDWR.L
5.0%
PRWU.L
6.1%

Energy

IDWR.L
3.9%
PRWU.L
4.0%

Basic Materials

IDWR.L
3.2%
PRWU.L
3.2%

Utilities

IDWR.L
2.6%
PRWU.L
2.7%

Real Estate

IDWR.L
1.6%
PRWU.L
2.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IDWR.L vs. PRWU.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IDWR.L
IDWR.L Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
IDWR.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IDWR.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
IDWR.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
IDWR.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
IDWR.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank

PRWU.L
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IDWR.L vs. PRWU.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI World UCITS (IDWR.L) and Amundi Prime Global UCITS ETF DR (C) (PRWU.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IDWR.LPRWU.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.07

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.98

IDWR.L vs. PRWU.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IDWR.LPRWU.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.15

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.74

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.80

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.46

Drawdowns

IDWR.L vs. PRWU.L - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IDWR.LPRWU.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.75%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.29%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.08%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.04%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.06%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.46%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.61%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.96%

Volatility

IDWR.L vs. PRWU.L - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IDWR.LPRWU.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.30%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.08%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.85%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.60%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.86%

IDWR.L vs. PRWU.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

IDWR.L has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than PRWU.L's 0.05% expense ratio.


Dividends

IDWR.L vs. PRWU.L - Dividend Comparison

IDWR.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.85%, while PRWU.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IDWR.L
iShares MSCI World UCITS
0.85%0.93%1.08%1.29%1.46%1.05%1.14%1.61%1.87%1.58%1.77%1.83%
PRWU.L
Amundi Prime Global UCITS ETF DR (C)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


IDWR.L and PRWU.L have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, PRWU.L is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

PRWU.L is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for IDWR.L.

Both ETFs track MSCI ACWI NR USD. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for IDWR.L and 0.05% for PRWU.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IDWR.L and PRWU.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer