IDWP.L vs. IUIT.L
IDWP.L (iShares Developed Markets Property Yield UCITS) and IUIT.L (iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IDWP.L is a REIT fund tracking the FTSE EPRA Nareit Global TR USD, while IUIT.L is a Technology Equities fund tracking the S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Information Technology Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IDWP.L returned 3.24%/yr vs 26.33%/yr for IUIT.L. At a 0.41 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. IDWP.L charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for IUIT.L.
Performance
IDWP.L vs. IUIT.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IDWP.L achieves a 6.84% return, which is significantly lower than IUIT.L's 23.04% return. Over the past 10 years, IDWP.L has underperformed IUIT.L with an annualized return of 3.24%, while IUIT.L has yielded a comparatively higher 26.33% annualized return.
IDWP.L
- 1D
- 0.28%
- 1M
- -1.02%
- YTD
- 6.84%
- 6M
- 7.80%
- 1Y
- 10.53%
- 3Y*
- 8.57%
- 5Y*
- 0.73%
- 10Y*
- 3.24%
IUIT.L
- 1D
- -2.11%
- 1M
- 13.14%
- YTD
- 23.04%
- 6M
- 22.75%
- 1Y
- 51.87%
- 3Y*
- 34.42%
- 5Y*
- 24.18%
- 10Y*
- 26.33%
IDWP.L vs. IUIT.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IDWP.L iShares Developed Markets Property Yield UCITS | 6.84% | 9.19% | 0.18% | 9.37% | -24.02% | 25.37% | -9.53% | 21.22% | -5.44% | 11.19% |
IUIT.L iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF | 23.04% | 22.93% | 38.51% | 59.45% | -29.15% | 34.09% | 43.14% | 48.90% | -1.41% | 38.43% |
Correlation
The correlation between IDWP.L and IUIT.L is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 7, 2015 | 0.41 |
Over the past year, the correlation between IDWP.L and IUIT.L has dropped to 0.14 - well below their long-term average of 0.41, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
IDWP.L vs. IUIT.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IDWP.L
IUIT.L
Real Estate
-
Financial Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
-
Real Estate
IDWP.L
IUIT.L
-
Financial Services
IDWP.L
IUIT.L
-
Consumer Cyclical
IDWP.L
IUIT.L
-
Basic Materials
IDWP.L
-
IUIT.L
-
Communication Services
IDWP.L
-
IUIT.L
-
Consumer Defensive
IDWP.L
-
IUIT.L
-
Energy
IDWP.L
-
IUIT.L
Healthcare
IDWP.L
-
IUIT.L
-
Industrials
IDWP.L
-
IUIT.L
Technology
IDWP.L
-
IUIT.L
Utilities
IDWP.L
-
IUIT.L
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IDWP.L vs. IUIT.L — Risk / Return Rank
IDWP.L
IUIT.L
IDWP.L vs. IUIT.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Developed Markets Property Yield UCITS (IDWP.L) and iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF (IUIT.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IDWP.L | IUIT.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.67 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.01 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 1.41 | -0.25 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.07 | 3.03 | -1.96 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.64 | 8.99 | -5.35 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IDWP.L | IUIT.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.88 | 2.55 | -1.67 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.05 | 1.02 | -0.98 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.19 | 1.20 | -1.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.15 | 1.16 | -1.01 |
Drawdowns
IDWP.L vs. IUIT.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IDWP.L drawdown since its inception was -70.51%, which is greater than IUIT.L's maximum drawdown of -33.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IDWP.L and IUIT.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IDWP.L | IUIT.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -70.51% | -33.46% | -37.05% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.78% | -17.03% | +7.25% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.07% | -26.40% | +8.33% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.95% | -33.46% | -0.49% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.82% | -33.46% | -9.36% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.98% | -3.14% | -0.84% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.58% | -6.02% | -7.56% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.89% | 5.76% | -2.87% |
Volatility
IDWP.L vs. IUIT.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Developed Markets Property Yield UCITS (IDWP.L) is 3.63%, while iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF (IUIT.L) has a volatility of 7.49%. This indicates that IDWP.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IUIT.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IDWP.L | IUIT.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.63% | 7.49% | -3.86% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.20% | 15.53% | -6.33% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.98% | 20.28% | -8.30% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.24% | 23.61% | -7.37% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.23% | 22.47% | -5.24% |
IDWP.L vs. IUIT.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
IDWP.L has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than IUIT.L's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
IDWP.L vs. IUIT.L - Dividend Comparison
IDWP.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.01%, while IUIT.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IDWP.L iShares Developed Markets Property Yield UCITS | 3.01% | 3.07% | 3.22% | 3.07% | 3.66% | 2.22% | 2.91% | 2.89% | 3.94% | 2.91% | 3.27% | 3.01% |
IUIT.L iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IDWP.L and IUIT.L have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IUIT.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IUIT.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for IDWP.L.
IDWP.L is categorized as REIT, while IUIT.L is Technology Equities. IDWP.L tracks FTSE EPRA Nareit Global TR USD, while IUIT.L tracks S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Information Technology Index. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for IDWP.L and 0.15% for IUIT.L.
Find the right allocation for IDWP.L and IUIT.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer