PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
IDVY.L vs. CMB1.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

IDVY.L vs. CMB1.L

Last updated Jul 16, 2026
Documentation

IDVY.L (iShares EURO Dividend UCITS) and CMB1.L (iShares FTSE MIB UCITS ETF (Acc)) are both Europe Equities funds from iShares - IDVY.L tracks the MSCI EMU NR EUR while CMB1.L tracks the FTSE Italia AllShare TR EUR. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IDVY.L returned 8.08%/yr vs 16.22%/yr for CMB1.L. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. IDVY.L charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.33%/yr for CMB1.L.

Performance

IDVY.L vs. CMB1.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares EURO Dividend UCITS (IDVY.L) and iShares FTSE MIB UCITS ETF (Acc) (CMB1.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IDVY.L achieves a 9.60% return, which is significantly lower than CMB1.L's 16.84% return. Over the past 10 years, IDVY.L has underperformed CMB1.L with an annualized return of 8.08%, while CMB1.L has yielded a comparatively higher 16.22% annualized return.

IDVY.L

1D
-0.52%
1M
0.13%
6M
8.94%
YTD
9.60%
1Y
21.35%
3Y*
21.00%
5Y*
10.11%
10Y*
8.08%

CMB1.L

1D
-1.50%
1M
-0.46%
6M
15.33%
YTD
16.84%
1Y
34.04%
3Y*
27.54%
5Y*
21.33%
10Y*
16.22%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IDVY.L vs. CMB1.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IDVY.L
iShares EURO Dividend UCITS		9.60%48.82%3.38%2.07%-8.05%15.68%-13.27%15.14%-9.98%13.82%
CMB1.L
iShares FTSE MIB UCITS ETF (Acc)		16.84%43.83%13.25%30.68%-3.56%18.29%1.52%24.83%-13.79%22.48%

Correlation

The correlation between IDVY.L and CMB1.L is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.81

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.81

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.83

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.82

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 26, 2010

0.81

The correlation between IDVY.L and CMB1.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.

IDVY.L vs. CMB1.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
IDVY.L
CMB1.L

Financial Services

50.3%
47.4%

Industrials

16.4%
10.7%

Utilities

8.3%
15.6%

Consumer Cyclical

7.9%
9.6%

Communication Services

5.7%
1.9%

Energy

4.6%
6.8%

Consumer Defensive

4.0%
0.4%

Healthcare

3.0%
1.1%

Basic Materials

-

0.5%

Real Estate

-

0.3%

Technology

-

5.7%

Financial Services

IDVY.L
50.3%
CMB1.L
47.4%

Industrials

IDVY.L
16.4%
CMB1.L
10.7%

Utilities

IDVY.L
8.3%
CMB1.L
15.6%

Consumer Cyclical

IDVY.L
7.9%
CMB1.L
9.6%

Communication Services

IDVY.L
5.7%
CMB1.L
1.9%

Energy

IDVY.L
4.6%
CMB1.L
6.8%

Consumer Defensive

IDVY.L
4.0%
CMB1.L
0.4%

Healthcare

IDVY.L
3.0%
CMB1.L
1.1%

Basic Materials

IDVY.L

-

CMB1.L
0.5%

Real Estate

IDVY.L

-

CMB1.L
0.3%

Technology

IDVY.L

-

CMB1.L
5.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

iShares EURO Dividend UCITS

iShares FTSE MIB UCITS ETF (Acc)

Often compared with IDVY.L:
IDVY.L vs. EUDI.LIDVY.L vs. IUKD.LIDVY.L vs. CSX5.LIDVY.L vs. DGROIDVY.L vs. FEV.LIDVY.L vs. FLXD.LIDVY.L vs. DVY
Often compared with CMB1.L:
CMB1.L vs. XDEM.LCMB1.L vs. H50E.LCMB1.L vs. IITU.LCMB1.L vs. SPYCMB1.L vs. X7PP.LCMB1.L vs. IQSA.LCMB1.L vs. EQQQ.L

Return for Risk

IDVY.L vs. CMB1.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
IDVY.L
IDVY.L Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
IDVY.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IDVY.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
IDVY.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
IDVY.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
IDVY.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank
CMB1.L
CMB1.L Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
CMB1.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CMB1.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
CMB1.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
CMB1.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
CMB1.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IDVY.L vs. CMB1.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares EURO Dividend UCITS (IDVY.L) and iShares FTSE MIB UCITS ETF (Acc) (CMB1.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

IDVY.LCMB1.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
1.77
2.23

-0.46

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
2.42
3.02

-0.60

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.39

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.37

3.28

-0.91

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.01

11.74

-3.73

IDVY.L vs. CMB1.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IDVY.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.77, which is comparable to the CMB1.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IDVY.L and CMB1.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IDVY.L vs. CMB1.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IDVY.L drawdown since its inception was -74.07%, which is greater than CMB1.L's maximum drawdown of -56.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IDVY.L and CMB1.L.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

IDVY.LCMB1.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-74.07%

-56.05%

-18.02%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.95%

-10.32%

+1.37%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.50%

-15.62%

+5.12%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.98%

-24.19%

+3.21%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.12%

-36.61%

-2.51%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.65%

-2.96%

+2.31%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-33.84%

-15.16%

-18.68%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.66%

2.89%

-0.23%

Volatility

IDVY.L vs. CMB1.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares EURO Dividend UCITS (IDVY.L) is 3.22%, while iShares FTSE MIB UCITS ETF (Acc) (CMB1.L) has a volatility of 3.99%. This indicates that IDVY.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CMB1.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

IDVY.LCMB1.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.22%

3.99%

-0.77%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.61%

12.72%

-3.11%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.00%

15.22%

-3.22%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.36%

17.98%

-2.62%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.31%

20.03%

-2.72%

IDVY.L vs. CMB1.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

IDVY.L has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than CMB1.L's 0.33% expense ratio.

Dividends

IDVY.L vs. CMB1.L - Dividend Comparison

IDVY.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.51%, while CMB1.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CMB1.L
iShares FTSE MIB UCITS ETF (Acc)		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
IDVY.L
iShares EURO Dividend UCITS		4.51%4.28%5.94%5.75%5.08%3.76%3.59%5.03%4.68%3.85%3.69%3.93%

Frequently Asked Questions

IDVY.L and CMB1.L have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, CMB1.L is cheaper at 0.33% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

CMB1.L is cheaper with a 0.33% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for IDVY.L.

IDVY.L tracks MSCI EMU NR EUR, while CMB1.L tracks FTSE Italia AllShare TR EUR. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for IDVY.L and 0.33% for CMB1.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IDVY.L and CMB1.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer