IDVO vs. MAGS
IDVO (Amplify CWP International Enhanced Dividend Income ETF) and MAGS (Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IDVO is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Amplify, while MAGS is a Technology Equities fund actively managed by Roundhill. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, IDVO returned 22.78%/yr vs 31.29%/yr for MAGS. A 0.52 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IDVO charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for MAGS.
Performance
IDVO vs. MAGS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IDVO achieves a 14.60% return, which is significantly higher than MAGS's -1.59% return.
IDVO
- 1D
- 0.52%
- 1M
- 2.64%
- YTD
- 14.60%
- 6M
- 15.00%
- 1Y
- 35.61%
- 3Y*
- 22.78%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MAGS
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -7.06%
- YTD
- -1.59%
- 6M
- -0.43%
- 1Y
- 23.92%
- 3Y*
- 31.29%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IDVO vs. MAGS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
IDVO Amplify CWP International Enhanced Dividend Income ETF | 14.60% | 36.46% | 10.16% | 10.76% |
MAGS Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF | -1.59% | 22.99% | 63.97% | 35.74% |
Correlation
The correlation between IDVO and MAGS is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 11, 2023 | 0.52 |
The correlation between IDVO and MAGS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.52 to 0.58 - a consistent structural relationship.
IDVO vs. MAGS - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IDVO
MAGS
Financial Services
-
Basic Materials
-
Energy
-
Technology
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Consumer Cyclical
Utilities
-
Real Estate
-
-
Financial Services
IDVO
MAGS
-
Basic Materials
IDVO
MAGS
-
Energy
IDVO
MAGS
-
Technology
IDVO
MAGS
Communication Services
IDVO
MAGS
Consumer Defensive
IDVO
MAGS
-
Healthcare
IDVO
MAGS
-
Industrials
IDVO
MAGS
-
Consumer Cyclical
IDVO
MAGS
Utilities
IDVO
MAGS
-
Real Estate
IDVO
-
MAGS
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IDVO vs. MAGS — Risk / Return Rank
IDVO
MAGS
IDVO vs. MAGS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amplify CWP International Enhanced Dividend Income ETF (IDVO) and Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF (MAGS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IDVO | MAGS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.95 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.19 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 1.20 | +0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.30 | 1.25 | +2.06 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.60 | 4.21 | +8.40 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IDVO vs. MAGS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IDVO drawdown since its inception was -15.46%, smaller than the maximum MAGS drawdown of -29.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IDVO and MAGS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IDVO | MAGS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -15.46% | -29.91% | +14.45% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.37% | -18.62% | +8.25% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.46% | -29.91% | +14.45% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.84% | -8.50% | +7.66% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.30% | -4.72% | +2.42% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.71% | 5.50% | -2.79% |
Volatility
IDVO vs. MAGS - Volatility Comparison
Amplify CWP International Enhanced Dividend Income ETF (IDVO) has a higher volatility of 6.41% compared to Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF (MAGS) at 5.86%. This indicates that IDVO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MAGS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IDVO | MAGS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.41% | 5.86% | +0.55% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.94% | 15.07% | -1.13% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.40% | 20.30% | -3.90% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.50% | 25.97% | -9.47% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.50% | 25.97% | -9.47% |
IDVO vs. MAGS - Expense Ratio Comparison
IDVO has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than MAGS's 0.29% expense ratio.
Dividends
IDVO vs. MAGS - Dividend Comparison
IDVO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.46%, more than MAGS's 1.50% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IDVO Amplify CWP International Enhanced Dividend Income ETF | 5.46% | 5.42% | 6.14% | 5.72% | 1.96% |
MAGS Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF | 1.50% | 1.48% | 0.81% | 0.44% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IDVO and MAGS have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IDVO has higher volatility (6.41%) compared to MAGS (5.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IDVO dropped -15.46% vs MAGS's -29.91%.
On 3-year performance, MAGS leads with 31.29% vs 22.78% for IDVO. On fees, MAGS is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, MAGS has been the lower-risk option at 5.86%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, MAGS has performed better with a 31.29% return vs 22.78%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
MAGS is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for IDVO.
IDVO has the higher dividend yield at 5.46%, compared with 1.50% for MAGS.
IDVO is categorized as Derivative Income, while MAGS is Technology Equities. They also come from different issuers: Amplify and Roundhill. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for IDVO and 0.29% for MAGS.
IDVO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.09 vs 1.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IDVO and MAGS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer