PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IDVO vs. FLSP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IDVO vs. FLSP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Amplify CWP International Enhanced Dividend Income ETF (IDVO) and Franklin Liberty Systematic Style Premia ETF (FLSP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IDVO achieves a 11.49% return, which is significantly higher than FLSP's 2.12% return.


IDVO

1D
0.24%
1M
-2.10%
YTD
11.49%
6M
12.59%
1Y
31.78%
3Y*
22.06%
5Y*
10Y*

FLSP

1D
-0.18%
1M
1.29%
YTD
2.12%
6M
4.50%
1Y
14.93%
3Y*
10.39%
5Y*
8.09%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IDVO vs. FLSP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
IDVO
Amplify CWP International Enhanced Dividend Income ETF
11.49%36.46%10.16%17.53%5.47%
FLSP
Franklin Liberty Systematic Style Premia ETF
2.12%15.56%11.75%3.14%1.86%

Correlation

The correlation between IDVO and FLSP is 0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.06

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.05

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 9, 2022

0.05

IDVO vs. FLSP - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IDVO
FLSP

Financial Services

18.3%
18.7%

Basic Materials

15.7%
5.8%

Energy

12.1%
4.7%

Industrials

9.8%
14.8%

Communication Services

9.1%
6.5%

Technology

8.7%
21.1%

Healthcare

8.3%
9.7%

Consumer Defensive

7.5%
6.3%

Utilities

6.4%
3.3%

Consumer Cyclical

4.2%
8.0%

Real Estate

-

1.2%

Financial Services

IDVO
18.3%
FLSP
18.7%

Basic Materials

IDVO
15.7%
FLSP
5.8%

Energy

IDVO
12.1%
FLSP
4.7%

Industrials

IDVO
9.8%
FLSP
14.8%

Communication Services

IDVO
9.1%
FLSP
6.5%

Technology

IDVO
8.7%
FLSP
21.1%

Healthcare

IDVO
8.3%
FLSP
9.7%

Consumer Defensive

IDVO
7.5%
FLSP
6.3%

Utilities

IDVO
6.4%
FLSP
3.3%

Consumer Cyclical

IDVO
4.2%
FLSP
8.0%

Real Estate

IDVO

-

FLSP
1.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IDVO vs. FLSP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IDVO
IDVO Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
IDVO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IDVO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
IDVO Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
IDVO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
IDVO Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank

FLSP
FLSP Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
FLSP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLSP Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLSP Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
FLSP Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLSP Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IDVO vs. FLSP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amplify CWP International Enhanced Dividend Income ETF (IDVO) and Franklin Liberty Systematic Style Premia ETF (FLSP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IDVOFLSPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.38

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.37

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.28

+0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.08

3.72

-0.64

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.84

10.78

+1.06

IDVO vs. FLSP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IDVO Sharpe Ratio is 2.00, which is comparable to the FLSP Sharpe Ratio of 1.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IDVO and FLSP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IDVOFLSPDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.00

1.62

+0.38

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.61

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.32

0.31

+1.01

Drawdowns

IDVO vs. FLSP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IDVO drawdown since its inception was -15.46%, smaller than the maximum FLSP drawdown of -22.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IDVO and FLSP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IDVOFLSPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.46%

-22.75%

+7.29%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.37%

-4.03%

-6.34%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.46%

-6.69%

-8.77%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-9.52%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.52%

-1.12%

-2.40%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.30%

-6.29%

+3.99%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.69%

1.39%

+1.30%

Volatility

IDVO vs. FLSP - Volatility Comparison

Amplify CWP International Enhanced Dividend Income ETF (IDVO) has a higher volatility of 5.30% compared to Franklin Liberty Systematic Style Premia ETF (FLSP) at 1.87%. This indicates that IDVO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLSP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IDVOFLSPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.30%

1.87%

+3.43%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.50%

6.87%

+6.63%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.02%

9.29%

+6.73%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.43%

13.37%

+3.06%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.43%

13.52%

+2.91%

IDVO vs. FLSP - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both IDVO and FLSP have an expense ratio of 0.65%.


Dividends

IDVO vs. FLSP - Dividend Comparison

IDVO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.61%, more than FLSP's 2.60% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
FLSP
Franklin Liberty Systematic Style Premia ETF
2.60%2.65%1.18%1.19%2.18%1.19%8.08%
IDVO
Amplify CWP International Enhanced Dividend Income ETF
5.61%5.42%6.14%5.72%1.96%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


IDVO and FLSP have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IDVO has higher volatility (5.30%) compared to FLSP (1.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IDVO dropped -15.46% vs FLSP's -22.75%.

On 3-year performance, IDVO leads with 22.06% vs 10.39% for FLSP. Both ETFs have the same 0.65% expense ratio. On volatility, FLSP has been the lower-risk option at 1.87%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, IDVO has performed better with a 22.06% return vs 10.39%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IDVO and FLSP have the same expense ratio: 0.65% per year.

IDVO has the higher dividend yield at 5.61%, compared with 2.60% for FLSP.

IDVO is categorized as Derivative Income, while FLSP is Long-Short. They also come from different issuers: Amplify and Franklin Templeton.

IDVO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.00 vs 1.62), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IDVO and FLSP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer