IDTW.L vs. CNX1.L
IDTW.L (iShares MSCI Taiwan UCITS ETF USD (Dist)) and CNX1.L (iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) are both exchange-traded funds - IDTW.L is a Technology Equities fund tracking the iShares MSCI Taiwan UCITS ETF USD (Dist), while CNX1.L is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IDTW.L returned 20.33%/yr vs 21.06%/yr for CNX1.L. A 0.58 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IDTW.L charges 0.74%/yr vs 0.36%/yr for CNX1.L.
Performance
IDTW.L vs. CNX1.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
IDTW.L is traded in USD, while CNX1.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the CNX1.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IDTW.L achieves a 57.81% return, which is significantly higher than CNX1.L's 16.31% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with IDTW.L having a 20.33% annualized return and CNX1.L not far ahead at 21.06%.
IDTW.L
- 1D
- -1.85%
- 1M
- -6.53%
- 6M
- 50.70%
- YTD
- 57.81%
- 1Y
- 84.29%
- 3Y*
- 39.37%
- 5Y*
- 19.77%
- 10Y*
- 20.33%
CNX1.L
- 1D
- -0.27%
- 1M
- -3.00%
- 6M
- 16.58%
- YTD
- 16.31%
- 1Y
- 28.90%
- 3Y*
- 24.01%
- 5Y*
- 15.40%
- 10Y*
- 21.06%
IDTW.L vs. CNX1.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IDTW.L iShares MSCI Taiwan UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | 57.81% | 31.78% | 23.61% | 28.84% | -29.55% | 28.51% | 34.35% | 34.44% | -9.12% | 28.06% |
CNX1.L iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 16.31% | 19.98% | 26.37% | 55.50% | -33.49% | 28.32% | 47.63% | 38.99% | -1.30% | 31.56% |
Correlation
The correlation between IDTW.L and CNX1.L is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 26, 2010 | 0.58 |
The correlation between IDTW.L and CNX1.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.58 (all time) to 0.73 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IDTW.L vs. CNX1.L — Risk / Return Rank
IDTW.L
CNX1.L
IDTW.L vs. CNX1.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Taiwan UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (IDTW.L) and iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CNX1.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IDTW.L | CNX1.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.27 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.19 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.48 | 1.29 | +0.19 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 7.24 | 2.62 | +4.63 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 19.11 | 8.92 | +10.19 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IDTW.L vs. CNX1.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IDTW.L drawdown since its inception was -60.07%, which is greater than CNX1.L's maximum drawdown of -35.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IDTW.L and CNX1.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IDTW.L | CNX1.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -60.07% | -35.21% | -24.86% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.44% | -10.99% | -0.45% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.24% | -23.11% | -5.13% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -40.98% | -35.21% | -5.77% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -40.98% | -35.21% | -5.77% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.06% | -3.46% | -7.60% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.59% | -5.47% | -7.12% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.34% | 3.23% | +1.11% |
Volatility
IDTW.L vs. CNX1.L - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI Taiwan UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (IDTW.L) has a higher volatility of 11.69% compared to iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CNX1.L) at 6.28%. This indicates that IDTW.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CNX1.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IDTW.L | CNX1.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.69% | 6.28% | +5.41% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 24.41% | 13.32% | +11.09% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.97% | 17.05% | +10.92% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.91% | 31.57% | -7.66% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.38% | 26.08% | -3.70% |
IDTW.L vs. CNX1.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
IDTW.L has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is higher than CNX1.L's 0.36% expense ratio.
Dividends
IDTW.L vs. CNX1.L - Dividend Comparison
IDTW.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.96%, while CNX1.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CNX1.L iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IDTW.L iShares MSCI Taiwan UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | 0.96% | 1.51% | 1.43% | 2.09% | 3.39% | 1.35% | 1.73% | 2.15% | 2.78% | 2.70% | 3.10% | 3.33% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IDTW.L and CNX1.L have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CNX1.L is cheaper at 0.36% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CNX1.L is cheaper with a 0.36% expense ratio, compared with 0.74% for IDTW.L.
IDTW.L is categorized as Technology Equities, while CNX1.L is Nasdaq-100. IDTW.L tracks iShares MSCI Taiwan UCITS ETF USD (Dist), while CNX1.L tracks NASDAQ-100 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.74% for IDTW.L and 0.36% for CNX1.L.
Find the right allocation for IDTW.L and CNX1.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer