PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IDTM.L vs. VDTA.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IDTM.L vs. VDTA.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares USD Treasury Bond 7-10yr UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (IDTM.L) and Vanguard USD Treasury Bond UCITS ETF Accumulating (VDTA.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IDTM.L achieves a -1.47% return, which is significantly lower than VDTA.L's -0.23% return.


IDTM.L

1D
0.21%
1M
-0.61%
YTD
-1.47%
6M
-1.11%
1Y
2.78%
3Y*
2.49%
5Y*
33.73%
10Y*
23.02%

VDTA.L

1D
0.21%
1M
0.17%
YTD
-0.23%
6M
0.10%
1Y
3.61%
3Y*
2.87%
5Y*
-0.41%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IDTM.L vs. VDTA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
IDTM.L
iShares USD Treasury Bond 7-10yr UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
-1.47%7.33%1.12%2.88%116.97%187.86%9.38%7.59%
VDTA.L
Vanguard USD Treasury Bond UCITS ETF Accumulating
-0.23%6.25%0.93%3.71%-12.37%-2.33%7.64%6.63%

Correlation

The correlation between IDTM.L and VDTA.L is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.96

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.96

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 22, 2019

0.93

The correlation between IDTM.L and VDTA.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IDTM.L vs. VDTA.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IDTM.L
IDTM.L Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
IDTM.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IDTM.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
IDTM.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
IDTM.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
IDTM.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank

VDTA.L
VDTA.L Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
VDTA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VDTA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
VDTA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
VDTA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
VDTA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IDTM.L vs. VDTA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares USD Treasury Bond 7-10yr UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (IDTM.L) and Vanguard USD Treasury Bond UCITS ETF Accumulating (VDTA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IDTM.LVDTA.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.44

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.64

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.10

1.18

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.67

1.23

-0.56

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.99

3.80

-1.81

IDTM.L vs. VDTA.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IDTM.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.58, which is lower than the VDTA.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IDTM.L and VDTA.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IDTM.LVDTA.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.58

1.02

-0.44

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.43

-0.07

+0.50

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.39

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.32

0.22

+0.09

Drawdowns

IDTM.L vs. VDTA.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IDTM.L drawdown since its inception was -13.21%, smaller than the maximum VDTA.L drawdown of -18.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IDTM.L and VDTA.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IDTM.LVDTA.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-13.21%

-18.82%

+5.61%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.11%

-2.90%

-1.21%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.38%

-5.15%

-2.23%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-13.21%

-16.41%

+3.20%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-13.21%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.05%

-6.97%

+3.92%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.31%

-8.11%

+3.80%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.39%

0.94%

+0.45%

Volatility

IDTM.L vs. VDTA.L - Volatility Comparison

iShares USD Treasury Bond 7-10yr UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (IDTM.L) has a higher volatility of 1.97% compared to Vanguard USD Treasury Bond UCITS ETF Accumulating (VDTA.L) at 1.37%. This indicates that IDTM.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VDTA.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IDTM.LVDTA.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.97%

1.37%

+0.60%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.48%

2.55%

+0.93%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.78%

3.51%

+1.27%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

78.73%

5.57%

+73.16%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

59.69%

5.35%

+54.34%

IDTM.L vs. VDTA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

IDTM.L has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is higher than VDTA.L's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

IDTM.L vs. VDTA.L - Dividend Comparison

IDTM.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.25%, while VDTA.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
IDTM.L
iShares USD Treasury Bond 7-10yr UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
3.25%3.11%5.23%2.48%66.26%84.42%1.24%1.92%1.82%1.49%1.45%
VDTA.L
Vanguard USD Treasury Bond UCITS ETF Accumulating
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.96, IDTM.L and VDTA.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, VDTA.L is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

VDTA.L is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.07% for IDTM.L.

IDTM.L tracks ICE U.S. Treasury 7-10 Year Bond Index, while VDTA.L tracks Bloomberg Global Aggregate US Treasury Float Adjusted index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for IDTM.L and 0.05% for VDTA.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IDTM.L and VDTA.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer