IDTM.L vs. CNDX.L
IDTM.L (iShares USD Treasury Bond 7-10yr UCITS ETF USD (Dist)) and CNDX.L (iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IDTM.L is a Government Bonds fund tracking the ICE U.S. Treasury 7-10 Year Bond Index, while CNDX.L is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IDTM.L returned 23.02%/yr vs 21.62%/yr for CNDX.L. At a correlation of -0.11, they often move in opposite directions. IDTM.L charges 0.07%/yr vs 0.33%/yr for CNDX.L.
Performance
IDTM.L vs. CNDX.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IDTM.L achieves a -1.47% return, which is significantly lower than CNDX.L's 19.65% return. Over the past 10 years, IDTM.L has outperformed CNDX.L with an annualized return of 23.02%, while CNDX.L has yielded a comparatively lower 21.62% annualized return.
IDTM.L
- 1D
- 0.21%
- 1M
- -0.61%
- YTD
- -1.47%
- 6M
- -1.11%
- 1Y
- 2.78%
- 3Y*
- 2.49%
- 5Y*
- 33.73%
- 10Y*
- 23.02%
CNDX.L
- 1D
- -0.66%
- 1M
- 8.52%
- YTD
- 19.65%
- 6M
- 19.10%
- 1Y
- 40.28%
- 3Y*
- 27.98%
- 5Y*
- 17.61%
- 10Y*
- 21.62%
IDTM.L vs. CNDX.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IDTM.L iShares USD Treasury Bond 7-10yr UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | -1.47% | 7.33% | 1.12% | 2.88% | 116.97% | 187.86% | 9.38% | 8.43% | -0.05% | 2.18% |
CNDX.L iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF | 19.65% | 19.75% | 26.45% | 56.31% | -33.45% | 27.96% | 48.33% | 38.07% | -1.03% | 32.36% |
Correlation
The correlation between IDTM.L and CNDX.L is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.05 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.06 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 16, 2010 | -0.11 |
The correlation between IDTM.L and CNDX.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.11 (all time) to 0.19 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IDTM.L vs. CNDX.L — Risk / Return Rank
IDTM.L
CNDX.L
IDTM.L vs. CNDX.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares USD Treasury Bond 7-10yr UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (IDTM.L) and iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (CNDX.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IDTM.L | CNDX.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.93 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.63 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.10 | 1.43 | -0.33 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.67 | 3.61 | -2.94 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.99 | 13.03 | -11.04 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IDTM.L | CNDX.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.58 | 2.52 | -1.93 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.43 | 0.84 | -0.41 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.39 | 1.07 | -0.69 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.32 | 1.12 | -0.80 |
Drawdowns
IDTM.L vs. CNDX.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IDTM.L drawdown since its inception was -13.21%, smaller than the maximum CNDX.L drawdown of -35.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IDTM.L and CNDX.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IDTM.L | CNDX.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -13.21% | -35.17% | +21.96% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.11% | -11.00% | +6.89% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -7.38% | -22.44% | +15.06% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -13.21% | -35.17% | +21.96% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -13.21% | -35.17% | +21.96% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.05% | -0.76% | -2.29% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.31% | -5.30% | +0.99% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.39% | 3.07% | -1.68% |
Volatility
IDTM.L vs. CNDX.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares USD Treasury Bond 7-10yr UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (IDTM.L) is 1.97%, while iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (CNDX.L) has a volatility of 4.90%. This indicates that IDTM.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CNDX.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IDTM.L | CNDX.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.97% | 4.90% | -2.93% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.48% | 11.88% | -8.40% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.78% | 15.79% | -11.01% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 78.73% | 20.87% | +57.86% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 59.69% | 20.07% | +39.62% |
IDTM.L vs. CNDX.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
IDTM.L has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than CNDX.L's 0.33% expense ratio.
Dividends
IDTM.L vs. CNDX.L - Dividend Comparison
IDTM.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.25%, while CNDX.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CNDX.L iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.02% | 0.05% | 0.06% | 0.03% | 0.04% | 0.07% | 0.06% | 0.30% | 0.16% | 0.16% |
IDTM.L iShares USD Treasury Bond 7-10yr UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | 3.25% | 3.11% | 5.23% | 2.48% | 66.26% | 84.42% | 1.24% | 1.92% | 1.82% | 1.49% | 1.45% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IDTM.L and CNDX.L have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IDTM.L is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IDTM.L is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.33% for CNDX.L.
IDTM.L is categorized as Government Bonds, while CNDX.L is Nasdaq-100. IDTM.L tracks ICE U.S. Treasury 7-10 Year Bond Index, while CNDX.L tracks NASDAQ-100 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for IDTM.L and 0.33% for CNDX.L.
Find the right allocation for IDTM.L and CNDX.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer