PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IDTL.L vs. GGOV.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IDTL.L vs. GGOV.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Treasury Bond 20+ UCITS (IDTL.L) and Amundi Index J.P. Morgan GBI Global Govies (GGOV.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

IDTL.L is traded in USD, while GGOV.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the GGOV.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with IDTL.L having a -1.14% return and GGOV.L slightly lower at -1.16%.


IDTL.L

1D
0.36%
1M
0.66%
YTD
-1.14%
6M
-1.07%
1Y
3.86%
3Y*
-1.56%
5Y*
-6.07%
10Y*
-1.51%

GGOV.L

1D
0.20%
1M
-0.12%
YTD
-1.16%
6M
-0.81%
1Y
-0.32%
3Y*
1.17%
5Y*
-3.23%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IDTL.L vs. GGOV.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
IDTL.L
iShares Treasury Bond 20+ UCITS
-1.14%4.67%-7.18%2.22%-30.42%-4.71%17.11%-0.84%
GGOV.L
Amundi Index J.P. Morgan GBI Global Govies
-1.16%6.24%-3.46%3.23%-17.30%-6.55%9.85%-1.00%

Correlation

The correlation between IDTL.L and GGOV.L is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.61

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.50

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.51

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 9, 2019

0.47

The correlation between IDTL.L and GGOV.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.47 (all time) to 0.61 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IDTL.L vs. GGOV.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IDTL.L
IDTL.L Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
IDTL.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IDTL.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
IDTL.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
IDTL.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
IDTL.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank

GGOV.L
GGOV.L Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
GGOV.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GGOV.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
GGOV.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
GGOV.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
GGOV.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IDTL.L vs. GGOV.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Treasury Bond 20+ UCITS (IDTL.L) and Amundi Index J.P. Morgan GBI Global Govies (GGOV.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IDTL.LGGOV.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.44

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.66

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.07

1.00

+0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.50

-0.08

+0.58

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.27

-0.18

+1.45

IDTL.L vs. GGOV.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IDTL.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.39, which is higher than the GGOV.L Sharpe Ratio of -0.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IDTL.L and GGOV.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IDTL.LGGOV.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.39

-0.05

+0.44

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.40

-0.46

+0.06

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.10

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.08

-0.28

+0.20

Drawdowns

IDTL.L vs. GGOV.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IDTL.L drawdown since its inception was -48.31%, which is greater than GGOV.L's maximum drawdown of -28.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IDTL.L and GGOV.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IDTL.LGGOV.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-48.31%

-28.02%

-20.29%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.62%

-4.10%

-3.52%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.49%

-8.11%

-10.38%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-42.95%

-25.66%

-17.29%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-48.31%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-40.36%

-19.41%

-20.95%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-20.41%

-15.43%

-4.98%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.03%

1.74%

+1.29%

Volatility

IDTL.L vs. GGOV.L - Volatility Comparison

iShares Treasury Bond 20+ UCITS (IDTL.L) has a higher volatility of 3.32% compared to Amundi Index J.P. Morgan GBI Global Govies (GGOV.L) at 2.05%. This indicates that IDTL.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GGOV.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IDTL.LGGOV.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.32%

2.05%

+1.27%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.59%

4.55%

+2.04%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.89%

6.18%

+3.71%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.99%

9.20%

+5.79%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.61%

9.50%

+5.11%

IDTL.L vs. GGOV.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

IDTL.L has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than GGOV.L's 0.10% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

IDTL.L vs. GGOV.L - Dividend Comparison

IDTL.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.36%, while GGOV.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GGOV.L
Amundi Index J.P. Morgan GBI Global Govies
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
IDTL.L
iShares Treasury Bond 20+ UCITS
4.36%4.31%4.65%3.79%3.01%1.74%1.76%2.49%2.79%2.60%2.63%2.14%

Frequently Asked Questions


IDTL.L and GGOV.L have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, IDTL.L is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IDTL.L is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.10% for GGOV.L.

IDTL.L is categorized as Government Bonds, while GGOV.L is Global Bonds. IDTL.L tracks ICE U.S. Treasury 20+ Year Bond Index, while GGOV.L tracks Bloomberg Global Aggregate TR USD. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for IDTL.L and 0.10% for GGOV.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IDTL.L and GGOV.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer