IDTL.L vs. GLAD.L
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares Treasury Bond 20+ UCITS (IDTL.L) and SPDR Bloomberg Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF USD Hedged (Acc) (GLAD.L).
IDTL.L and GLAD.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. IDTL.L is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg US Government TR USD. It was launched on Jan 20, 2015. GLAD.L is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg Global Aggregate TR Hdg USD. It was launched on Oct 9, 2019. Both IDTL.L and GLAD.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: IDTL.L or GLAD.L.
Key characteristics
| IDTL.L | GLAD.L | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | -3.85% | 3.11% |
| 1Y Return | 8.36% | 8.21% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | -12.52% | -1.03% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | -5.08% | 0.34% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 0.59 | 1.94 |
| Sortino Ratio | 0.94 | 3.01 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.11 | 1.37 |
| Calmar Ratio | 0.19 | 0.73 |
| Martin Ratio | 1.56 | 8.97 |
| Ulcer Index | 5.65% | 0.94% |
| Daily Std Dev | 14.94% | 4.33% |
| Max Drawdown | -48.31% | -15.20% |
| Current Drawdown | -40.30% | -3.95% |
Correlation
The correlation between IDTL.L and GLAD.L is 0.81, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
IDTL.L vs. GLAD.L - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, IDTL.L achieves a -3.85% return, which is significantly lower than GLAD.L's 3.11% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
IDTL.L vs. GLAD.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
IDTL.L has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than GLAD.L's 0.10% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
IDTL.L vs. GLAD.L - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Treasury Bond 20+ UCITS (IDTL.L) and SPDR Bloomberg Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF USD Hedged (Acc) (GLAD.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
IDTL.L vs. GLAD.L - Dividend Comparison
IDTL.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.28%, while GLAD.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IDTL.L iShares Treasury Bond 20+ UCITS | 4.28% | 3.79% | 3.01% | 1.74% | 1.76% | 2.49% | 2.79% | 2.60% | 2.63% | 2.14% |
GLAD.L SPDR Bloomberg Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF USD Hedged (Acc) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
IDTL.L vs. GLAD.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IDTL.L drawdown since its inception was -48.31%, which is greater than GLAD.L's maximum drawdown of -15.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IDTL.L and GLAD.L. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
IDTL.L vs. GLAD.L - Volatility Comparison
iShares Treasury Bond 20+ UCITS (IDTL.L) has a higher volatility of 5.09% compared to SPDR Bloomberg Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF USD Hedged (Acc) (GLAD.L) at 1.06%. This indicates that IDTL.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GLAD.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.