IDTK.L vs. FLQA.L
IDTK.L (iShares MSCI Turkey UCITS ETF USD (Dist)) and FLQA.L (Franklin FTSE Asia ex China ex Japan UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) are both exchange-traded funds - IDTK.L is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the MSCI Turkey - Net Returns, while FLQA.L is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the Linked FTSE Asia ex Japan ex China Index - Net Return. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, IDTK.L returned 15.73%/yr vs 12.23%/yr for FLQA.L. At a 0.31 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. IDTK.L charges 0.74%/yr vs 0.14%/yr for FLQA.L.
Performance
IDTK.L vs. FLQA.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IDTK.L achieves a 16.16% return, which is significantly lower than FLQA.L's 30.17% return.
IDTK.L
- 1D
- -1.76%
- 1M
- -4.64%
- 6M
- 1.66%
- YTD
- 16.16%
- 1Y
- 17.88%
- 3Y*
- 13.14%
- 5Y*
- 15.73%
- 10Y*
- 1.48%
FLQA.L
- 1D
- -1.86%
- 1M
- -11.56%
- 6M
- 22.63%
- YTD
- 30.17%
- 1Y
- 48.05%
- 3Y*
- 24.43%
- 5Y*
- 12.23%
- 10Y*
- —
IDTK.L vs. FLQA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IDTK.L iShares MSCI Turkey UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | 16.16% | -3.80% | 17.64% | -6.83% | 89.97% | -28.16% | -9.47% | 10.81% | 6.53% |
FLQA.L Franklin FTSE Asia ex China ex Japan UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 30.17% | 29.84% | 7.76% | 12.02% | -12.93% | 4.57% | 6.71% | 9.75% | -5.84% |
Correlation
The correlation between IDTK.L and FLQA.L is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 27, 2018 | 0.31 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IDTK.L vs. FLQA.L — Risk / Return Rank
IDTK.L
FLQA.L
IDTK.L vs. FLQA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Turkey UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (IDTK.L) and Franklin FTSE Asia ex China ex Japan UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (FLQA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IDTK.L | FLQA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.24 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.38 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.14 | 1.34 | -0.20 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.15 | 3.37 | -2.22 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.60 | 10.76 | -8.16 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IDTK.L vs. FLQA.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IDTK.L drawdown since its inception was -76.41%, which is greater than FLQA.L's maximum drawdown of -29.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IDTK.L and FLQA.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IDTK.L | FLQA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -76.41% | -29.21% | -47.20% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.47% | -14.19% | -1.28% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -32.38% | -22.19% | -10.19% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.38% | -25.38% | -7.00% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -64.70% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -39.75% | -14.19% | -25.56% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -44.36% | -7.22% | -37.14% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.86% | 4.45% | +2.41% |
Volatility
IDTK.L vs. FLQA.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares MSCI Turkey UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (IDTK.L) is 5.58%, while Franklin FTSE Asia ex China ex Japan UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (FLQA.L) has a volatility of 10.89%. This indicates that IDTK.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FLQA.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IDTK.L | FLQA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.58% | 10.89% | -5.31% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.58% | 23.07% | -1.49% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.93% | 25.18% | +1.75% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 34.62% | 17.75% | +16.87% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 34.31% | 18.53% | +15.78% |
IDTK.L vs. FLQA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
IDTK.L has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is higher than FLQA.L's 0.14% expense ratio.
Dividends
IDTK.L vs. FLQA.L - Dividend Comparison
IDTK.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.85%, while FLQA.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLQA.L Franklin FTSE Asia ex China ex Japan UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IDTK.L iShares MSCI Turkey UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | 1.85% | 1.75% | 2.47% | 3.13% | 1.97% | 3.81% | 0.59% | 2.45% | 4.77% | 1.88% | 2.07% | 2.57% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IDTK.L and FLQA.L have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FLQA.L is cheaper at 0.14% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FLQA.L is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.74% for IDTK.L.
IDTK.L is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while FLQA.L is Asia Pacific Equities. IDTK.L tracks MSCI Turkey - Net Returns, while FLQA.L tracks Linked FTSE Asia ex Japan ex China Index - Net Return. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Franklin. Their fees differ too: 0.74% for IDTK.L and 0.14% for FLQA.L.
Find the right allocation for IDTK.L and FLQA.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer