IDTK.L vs. CNDX.L
IDTK.L (iShares MSCI Turkey UCITS ETF) and CNDX.L (iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IDTK.L is a Global Equities fund tracking the iShares MSCI Turkey UCITS ETF, while CNDX.L is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IDTK.L returned 0.13%/yr vs 20.97%/yr for CNDX.L. At a 0.33 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. IDTK.L charges 0.74%/yr vs 0.33%/yr for CNDX.L.
Performance
IDTK.L vs. CNDX.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with IDTK.L having a 16.00% return and CNDX.L slightly lower at 15.91%. Over the past 10 years, IDTK.L has underperformed CNDX.L with an annualized return of 0.13%, while CNDX.L has yielded a comparatively higher 20.97% annualized return.
IDTK.L
- 1D
- 0.05%
- 1M
- -5.02%
- 6M
- 3.96%
- YTD
- 16.00%
- 1Y
- 19.11%
- 3Y*
- 11.51%
- 5Y*
- 15.70%
- 10Y*
- 0.13%
CNDX.L
- 1D
- -0.67%
- 1M
- -3.48%
- 6M
- 16.01%
- YTD
- 15.91%
- 1Y
- 28.40%
- 3Y*
- 23.77%
- 5Y*
- 15.27%
- 10Y*
- 20.97%
IDTK.L vs. CNDX.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IDTK.L iShares MSCI Turkey UCITS ETF | 16.00% | -3.80% | 17.64% | -6.83% | 89.97% | -28.16% | -9.47% | 10.81% | -41.67% | 37.23% |
CNDX.L iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF | 15.91% | 19.75% | 26.42% | 56.22% | -33.49% | 27.92% | 48.25% | 37.96% | -1.08% | 31.91% |
Correlation
The correlation between IDTK.L and CNDX.L is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 15, 2010 | 0.33 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IDTK.L vs. CNDX.L — Risk / Return Rank
IDTK.L
CNDX.L
IDTK.L vs. CNDX.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Turkey UCITS ETF (IDTK.L) and iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (CNDX.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IDTK.L | CNDX.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.92 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.18 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 1.29 | -0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.23 | 2.57 | -1.34 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.80 | 8.61 | -5.81 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IDTK.L vs. CNDX.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IDTK.L drawdown since its inception was -76.41%, which is greater than CNDX.L's maximum drawdown of -35.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IDTK.L and CNDX.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IDTK.L | CNDX.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -76.41% | -35.21% | -41.20% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.47% | -11.00% | -4.47% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -32.38% | -22.44% | -9.94% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.38% | -35.21% | +2.83% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -64.70% | -35.21% | -29.49% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -39.83% | -3.87% | -35.96% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -44.37% | -5.12% | -39.25% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.81% | 3.29% | +3.52% |
Volatility
IDTK.L vs. CNDX.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares MSCI Turkey UCITS ETF (IDTK.L) is 5.59%, while iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (CNDX.L) has a volatility of 5.89%. This indicates that IDTK.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CNDX.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IDTK.L | CNDX.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.59% | 5.89% | -0.30% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.48% | 13.78% | +7.70% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.83% | 17.32% | +9.51% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 34.62% | 21.15% | +13.47% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 34.41% | 20.13% | +14.28% |
IDTK.L vs. CNDX.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
IDTK.L has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is higher than CNDX.L's 0.33% expense ratio.
Dividends
IDTK.L vs. CNDX.L - Dividend Comparison
IDTK.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.85%, while CNDX.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CNDX.L iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IDTK.L iShares MSCI Turkey UCITS ETF | 1.85% | 1.75% | 2.47% | 3.13% | 1.97% | 3.81% | 0.59% | 2.45% | 4.77% | 1.88% | 2.07% | 2.57% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IDTK.L and CNDX.L have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CNDX.L is cheaper at 0.33% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CNDX.L is cheaper with a 0.33% expense ratio, compared with 0.74% for IDTK.L.
IDTK.L is categorized as Global Equities, while CNDX.L is Nasdaq-100. IDTK.L tracks iShares MSCI Turkey UCITS ETF, while CNDX.L tracks NASDAQ-100 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.74% for IDTK.L and 0.33% for CNDX.L.
Find the right allocation for IDTK.L and CNDX.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer