IDRV vs. XT
IDRV (iShares Self-Driving EV and Tech ETF) and XT (iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF) are both Technology Equities funds from iShares - IDRV tracks the NYSE FactSet Global Autonomous Driving and Electric Vehicle Index while XT tracks the Morningstar Exponential Technologies Index (Net). Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, IDRV returned -0.25%/yr vs 8.42%/yr for XT. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. IDRV charges 0.48%/yr vs 0.46%/yr for XT.
Performance
IDRV vs. XT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IDRV achieves a 17.17% return, which is significantly lower than XT's 20.20% return.
IDRV
- 1D
- -2.29%
- 1M
- 3.06%
- YTD
- 17.17%
- 6M
- 18.17%
- 1Y
- 49.83%
- 3Y*
- 7.75%
- 5Y*
- -0.25%
- 10Y*
- —
XT
- 1D
- -0.47%
- 1M
- 9.47%
- YTD
- 20.20%
- 6M
- 20.54%
- 1Y
- 45.88%
- 3Y*
- 18.83%
- 5Y*
- 8.42%
- 10Y*
- 14.70%
IDRV vs. XT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IDRV iShares Self-Driving EV and Tech ETF | 17.17% | 32.24% | -16.05% | 7.83% | -36.37% | 26.99% | 59.46% | 7.24% |
XT iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF | 20.20% | 26.28% | 0.29% | 27.02% | -27.83% | 16.43% | 35.10% | 12.42% |
Correlation
The correlation between IDRV and XT is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 22, 2019 | 0.84 |
The correlation between IDRV and XT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.76 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.
IDRV vs. XT - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IDRV
XT
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Basic Materials
Technology
Communication Services
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Consumer Cyclical
IDRV
XT
Industrials
IDRV
XT
Basic Materials
IDRV
XT
Technology
IDRV
XT
Communication Services
IDRV
-
XT
Consumer Defensive
IDRV
-
XT
Energy
IDRV
-
XT
Financial Services
IDRV
-
XT
Healthcare
IDRV
-
XT
Real Estate
IDRV
-
XT
Utilities
IDRV
-
XT
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IDRV vs. XT — Risk / Return Rank
IDRV
XT
IDRV vs. XT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Self-Driving EV and Tech ETF (IDRV) and iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF (XT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IDRV | XT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.87 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.21 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.48 | -0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.97 | 4.41 | -0.44 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.15 | 18.51 | -5.36 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IDRV | XT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.02 | 2.89 | -0.87 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.01 | 0.41 | -0.42 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.73 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.35 | 0.66 | -0.31 |
Drawdowns
IDRV vs. XT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IDRV drawdown since its inception was -53.00%, which is greater than XT's maximum drawdown of -34.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IDRV and XT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IDRV | XT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -53.00% | -34.41% | -18.59% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.62% | -10.45% | -2.17% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -44.00% | -22.09% | -21.91% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -53.00% | -34.41% | -18.59% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -34.41% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.79% | -0.47% | -13.32% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -22.38% | -7.41% | -14.97% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.80% | 2.49% | +1.31% |
Volatility
IDRV vs. XT - Volatility Comparison
iShares Self-Driving EV and Tech ETF (IDRV) has a higher volatility of 9.41% compared to iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF (XT) at 4.85%. This indicates that IDRV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IDRV | XT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.41% | 4.85% | +4.56% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.86% | 11.94% | +6.92% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.81% | 15.99% | +8.82% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.70% | 20.76% | +6.94% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.09% | 20.08% | +8.01% |
IDRV vs. XT - Expense Ratio Comparison
IDRV has a 0.48% expense ratio, which is higher than XT's 0.46% expense ratio.
Dividends
IDRV vs. XT - Dividend Comparison
IDRV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.45%, less than XT's 6.61% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IDRV iShares Self-Driving EV and Tech ETF | 1.45% | 1.70% | 2.68% | 2.17% | 2.29% | 1.12% | 0.69% | 1.29% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XT iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF | 6.61% | 7.95% | 0.66% | 0.41% | 0.78% | 0.84% | 0.77% | 1.55% | 1.40% | 0.97% | 1.37% | 1.34% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IDRV and XT have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IDRV has higher volatility (9.41%) compared to XT (4.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IDRV dropped -53.00% vs XT's -34.41%.
On 5-year performance, XT leads with 8.42% vs -0.25% for IDRV. On fees, XT is cheaper at 0.46% per year. On volatility, XT has been the lower-risk option at 4.85%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, XT has performed better with a 8.42% return vs -0.25%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XT is cheaper with a 0.46% expense ratio, compared with 0.48% for IDRV.
XT has the higher dividend yield at 6.61%, compared with 1.45% for IDRV.
IDRV tracks NYSE FactSet Global Autonomous Driving and Electric Vehicle Index, while XT tracks Morningstar Exponential Technologies Index (Net). Their fees differ too: 0.48% for IDRV and 0.46% for XT.
XT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.89 vs 2.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IDRV and XT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer