IDRV vs. LIT
IDRV (iShares Self-Driving EV and Tech ETF) and LIT (Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IDRV is a Technology Equities fund tracking the NYSE FactSet Global Autonomous Driving and Electric Vehicle Index, while LIT is a Commodity Producers Equities fund tracking the Solactive Global Lithium Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, IDRV returned 0.50%/yr vs 5.97%/yr for LIT. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IDRV charges 0.48%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for LIT.
Performance
IDRV vs. LIT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IDRV achieves a 19.91% return, which is significantly lower than LIT's 33.21% return.
IDRV
- 1D
- 0.84%
- 1M
- 4.49%
- YTD
- 19.91%
- 6M
- 21.18%
- 1Y
- 55.29%
- 3Y*
- 8.59%
- 5Y*
- 0.50%
- 10Y*
- —
LIT
- 1D
- 0.36%
- 1M
- -2.61%
- YTD
- 33.21%
- 6M
- 37.93%
- 1Y
- 142.04%
- 3Y*
- 11.87%
- 5Y*
- 5.97%
- 10Y*
- 15.02%
IDRV vs. LIT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IDRV iShares Self-Driving EV and Tech ETF | 19.91% | 32.24% | -16.05% | 7.83% | -36.37% | 26.99% | 59.46% | 7.24% |
LIT Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF | 33.21% | 60.05% | -19.19% | -12.18% | -29.91% | 36.74% | 127.88% | -4.12% |
Correlation
The correlation between IDRV and LIT is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 22, 2019 | 0.79 |
The correlation between IDRV and LIT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.76 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.
IDRV vs. LIT - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IDRV
LIT
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Basic Materials
Technology
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
IDRV
LIT
Industrials
IDRV
LIT
Basic Materials
IDRV
LIT
Technology
IDRV
LIT
Communication Services
IDRV
-
LIT
-
Consumer Defensive
IDRV
-
LIT
-
Energy
IDRV
-
LIT
-
Financial Services
IDRV
-
LIT
-
Healthcare
IDRV
-
LIT
-
Real Estate
IDRV
-
LIT
-
Utilities
IDRV
-
LIT
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IDRV vs. LIT — Risk / Return Rank
IDRV
LIT
IDRV vs. LIT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Self-Driving EV and Tech ETF (IDRV) and Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF (LIT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IDRV | LIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.25 | 4.38 | -2.13 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.86 | 4.61 | -1.75 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.62 | -0.24 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.31 | 10.71 | -6.40 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.32 | 36.66 | -22.34 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IDRV | LIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.25 | 4.38 | -2.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.02 | 0.19 | -0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.49 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.36 | 0.27 | +0.09 |
Drawdowns
IDRV vs. LIT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IDRV drawdown since its inception was -53.00%, smaller than the maximum LIT drawdown of -65.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IDRV and LIT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IDRV | LIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -53.00% | -65.91% | +12.91% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.62% | -13.11% | +0.49% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -44.00% | -53.01% | +9.01% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -53.00% | -65.91% | +12.91% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -65.91% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.77% | -6.87% | -4.90% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -22.38% | -33.64% | +11.26% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.80% | 3.83% | -0.03% |
Volatility
IDRV vs. LIT - Volatility Comparison
iShares Self-Driving EV and Tech ETF (IDRV) has a higher volatility of 9.13% compared to Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF (LIT) at 8.68%. This indicates that IDRV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LIT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IDRV | LIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.13% | 8.68% | +0.45% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.72% | 21.92% | -3.20% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.70% | 32.62% | -7.92% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.69% | 31.83% | -4.14% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.09% | 30.66% | -2.57% |
IDRV vs. LIT - Expense Ratio Comparison
IDRV has a 0.48% expense ratio, which is lower than LIT's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
IDRV vs. LIT - Dividend Comparison
IDRV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.42%, more than LIT's 0.36% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IDRV iShares Self-Driving EV and Tech ETF | 1.42% | 1.70% | 2.68% | 2.17% | 2.29% | 1.12% | 0.69% | 1.29% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
LIT Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF | 0.36% | 0.49% | 0.93% | 1.11% | 0.99% | 0.22% | 0.40% | 1.85% | 2.52% | 3.26% | 2.15% | 0.24% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IDRV and LIT have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IDRV has higher volatility (9.13%) compared to LIT (8.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IDRV dropped -53.00% vs LIT's -65.91%.
On 5-year performance, LIT leads with 5.97% vs 0.50% for IDRV. On fees, IDRV is cheaper at 0.48% per year. On volatility, LIT has been the lower-risk option at 8.68%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, LIT has performed better with a 5.97% return vs 0.50%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IDRV is cheaper with a 0.48% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for LIT.
IDRV has the higher dividend yield at 1.42%, compared with 0.36% for LIT.
IDRV is categorized as Technology Equities, while LIT is Commodity Producers Equities. IDRV tracks NYSE FactSet Global Autonomous Driving and Electric Vehicle Index, while LIT tracks Solactive Global Lithium Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.48% for IDRV and 0.75% for LIT.
LIT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.38 vs 2.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IDRV and LIT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer