PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IDRV vs. LIT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IDRV vs. LIT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Self-Driving EV and Tech ETF (IDRV) and Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF (LIT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IDRV achieves a 19.91% return, which is significantly lower than LIT's 33.21% return.


IDRV

1D
0.84%
1M
4.49%
YTD
19.91%
6M
21.18%
1Y
55.29%
3Y*
8.59%
5Y*
0.50%
10Y*

LIT

1D
0.36%
1M
-2.61%
YTD
33.21%
6M
37.93%
1Y
142.04%
3Y*
11.87%
5Y*
5.97%
10Y*
15.02%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IDRV vs. LIT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
IDRV
iShares Self-Driving EV and Tech ETF
19.91%32.24%-16.05%7.83%-36.37%26.99%59.46%7.24%
LIT
Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF
33.21%60.05%-19.19%-12.18%-29.91%36.74%127.88%-4.12%

Correlation

The correlation between IDRV and LIT is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.76

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.82

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.79

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 22, 2019

0.79

The correlation between IDRV and LIT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.76 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.

IDRV vs. LIT - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IDRV
LIT

Consumer Cyclical

55.0%
7.0%

Industrials

24.8%
26.0%

Basic Materials

18.5%
55.4%

Technology

1.7%
11.5%

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Financial Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

IDRV
55.0%
LIT
7.0%

Industrials

IDRV
24.8%
LIT
26.0%

Basic Materials

IDRV
18.5%
LIT
55.4%

Technology

IDRV
1.7%
LIT
11.5%

Communication Services

IDRV

-

LIT

-

Consumer Defensive

IDRV

-

LIT

-

Energy

IDRV

-

LIT

-

Financial Services

IDRV

-

LIT

-

Healthcare

IDRV

-

LIT

-

Real Estate

IDRV

-

LIT

-

Utilities

IDRV

-

LIT

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IDRV vs. LIT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IDRV
IDRV Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
IDRV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IDRV Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
IDRV Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
IDRV Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
IDRV Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank

LIT
LIT Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
LIT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LIT Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
LIT Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
LIT Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
LIT Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IDRV vs. LIT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Self-Driving EV and Tech ETF (IDRV) and Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF (LIT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IDRVLITDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.25

4.38

-2.13

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.86

4.61

-1.75

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.62

-0.24

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

4.31

10.71

-6.40

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

14.32

36.66

-22.34

IDRV vs. LIT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IDRV Sharpe Ratio is 2.25, which is lower than the LIT Sharpe Ratio of 4.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IDRV and LIT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IDRVLITDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.25

4.38

-2.13

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.02

0.19

-0.17

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.49

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.36

0.27

+0.09

Drawdowns

IDRV vs. LIT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IDRV drawdown since its inception was -53.00%, smaller than the maximum LIT drawdown of -65.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IDRV and LIT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IDRVLITDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-53.00%

-65.91%

+12.91%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.62%

-13.11%

+0.49%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-44.00%

-53.01%

+9.01%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-53.00%

-65.91%

+12.91%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-65.91%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-11.77%

-6.87%

-4.90%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-22.38%

-33.64%

+11.26%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.80%

3.83%

-0.03%

Volatility

IDRV vs. LIT - Volatility Comparison

iShares Self-Driving EV and Tech ETF (IDRV) has a higher volatility of 9.13% compared to Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF (LIT) at 8.68%. This indicates that IDRV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LIT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IDRVLITDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.13%

8.68%

+0.45%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.72%

21.92%

-3.20%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.70%

32.62%

-7.92%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

27.69%

31.83%

-4.14%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

28.09%

30.66%

-2.57%

IDRV vs. LIT - Expense Ratio Comparison

IDRV has a 0.48% expense ratio, which is lower than LIT's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

IDRV vs. LIT - Dividend Comparison

IDRV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.42%, more than LIT's 0.36% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IDRV
iShares Self-Driving EV and Tech ETF
1.42%1.70%2.68%2.17%2.29%1.12%0.69%1.29%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
LIT
Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF
0.36%0.49%0.93%1.11%0.99%0.22%0.40%1.85%2.52%3.26%2.15%0.24%

Frequently Asked Questions


IDRV and LIT have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IDRV has higher volatility (9.13%) compared to LIT (8.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IDRV dropped -53.00% vs LIT's -65.91%.

On 5-year performance, LIT leads with 5.97% vs 0.50% for IDRV. On fees, IDRV is cheaper at 0.48% per year. On volatility, LIT has been the lower-risk option at 8.68%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, LIT has performed better with a 5.97% return vs 0.50%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IDRV is cheaper with a 0.48% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for LIT.

IDRV has the higher dividend yield at 1.42%, compared with 0.36% for LIT.

IDRV is categorized as Technology Equities, while LIT is Commodity Producers Equities. IDRV tracks NYSE FactSet Global Autonomous Driving and Electric Vehicle Index, while LIT tracks Solactive Global Lithium Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.48% for IDRV and 0.75% for LIT.

LIT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.38 vs 2.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IDRV and LIT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer