PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IDRV vs. CHPS
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

IDRV vs. CHPS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Self-Driving EV and Tech ETF (IDRV) and Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF (CHPS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

IDRV vs. CHPS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
IDRV
iShares Self-Driving EV and Tech ETF
2.35%32.24%-16.05%-18.40%
CHPS
Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF
14.69%58.47%7.75%10.88%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IDRV achieves a 2.35% return, which is significantly lower than CHPS's 14.69% return.


IDRV

1D
-0.13%
1M
3.01%
YTD
2.35%
6M
4.26%
1Y
34.07%
3Y*
2.82%
5Y*
-1.78%
10Y*

CHPS

1D
-0.75%
1M
-1.25%
YTD
14.69%
6M
29.80%
1Y
97.66%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


IDRV vs. CHPS - Expense Ratio Comparison

IDRV has a 0.48% expense ratio, which is higher than CHPS's 0.15% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

IDRV vs. CHPS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IDRV
IDRV Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
IDRV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IDRV Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
IDRV Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
IDRV Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
IDRV Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

CHPS
CHPS Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
CHPS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CHPS Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
CHPS Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
CHPS Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
CHPS Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IDRV vs. CHPS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Self-Driving EV and Tech ETF (IDRV) and Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF (CHPS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IDRVCHPSDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.25

2.60

-1.35

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.85

3.15

-1.30

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.43

-0.19

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.12

5.66

-3.54

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

8.18

19.56

-11.39

IDRV vs. CHPS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IDRV Sharpe Ratio is 1.25, which is lower than the CHPS Sharpe Ratio of 2.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IDRV and CHPS, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IDRVCHPSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.25

2.60

-1.35

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.07

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.28

1.01

-0.73

Correlation

The correlation between IDRV and CHPS is 0.59, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

IDRV vs. CHPS - Dividend Comparison

IDRV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.66%, more than CHPS's 0.59% yield.


TTM2025202420232022202120202019
IDRV
iShares Self-Driving EV and Tech ETF
1.66%1.70%2.68%2.17%2.29%1.12%0.69%1.29%
CHPS
Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF
0.59%0.68%1.75%0.36%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

IDRV vs. CHPS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IDRV drawdown since its inception was -53.00%, which is greater than CHPS's maximum drawdown of -39.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IDRV and CHPS.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


IDRVCHPSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-53.00%

-39.44%

-13.56%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.66%

-17.50%

+4.84%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-53.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-24.69%

-10.74%

-13.95%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-22.51%

-9.63%

-12.88%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.23%

5.07%

-0.84%

Volatility

IDRV vs. CHPS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Self-Driving EV and Tech ETF (IDRV) is 9.83%, while Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF (CHPS) has a volatility of 13.11%. This indicates that IDRV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CHPS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


IDRVCHPSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.83%

13.11%

-3.28%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.40%

26.25%

-7.85%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

27.42%

37.78%

-10.36%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

27.43%

32.80%

-5.37%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

28.09%

32.80%

-4.71%