IDP6.L vs. RS2G.L
IDP6.L (iShares S&P Small Cap 600 UCITS ETF USD (Dist)) and RS2G.L (Amundi Russell 2000 UCITS ETF USD) are both Small Cap Blend Equities funds - IDP6.L tracks the S&P 600 Small Cap Index (NET) while RS2G.L tracks the Russell 2000 TR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IDP6.L returned 10.19%/yr vs 7.58%/yr for RS2G.L. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IDP6.L charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for RS2G.L.
Performance
IDP6.L vs. RS2G.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
IDP6.L is traded in USD, while RS2G.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the RS2G.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with IDP6.L having a 19.64% return and RS2G.L slightly lower at 19.27%. Over the past 10 years, IDP6.L has outperformed RS2G.L with an annualized return of 10.19%, while RS2G.L has yielded a comparatively lower 7.58% annualized return.
IDP6.L
- 1D
- -1.22%
- 1M
- 1.58%
- 6M
- 13.50%
- YTD
- 19.64%
- 1Y
- 30.10%
- 3Y*
- 13.22%
- 5Y*
- 7.21%
- 10Y*
- 10.19%
RS2G.L
- 1D
- -0.76%
- 1M
- 0.90%
- 6M
- 11.04%
- YTD
- 19.27%
- 1Y
- 32.85%
- 3Y*
- 15.72%
- 5Y*
- 7.28%
- 10Y*
- 7.58%
IDP6.L vs. RS2G.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IDP6.L iShares S&P Small Cap 600 UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | 19.64% | 6.28% | 7.11% | 17.37% | -16.73% | 26.35% | 10.58% | 21.32% | -9.77% | 13.15% |
RS2G.L Amundi Russell 2000 UCITS ETF USD | 19.27% | 12.43% | 10.00% | 18.40% | -20.84% | 14.26% | 19.38% | 26.47% | -34.94% | 25.23% |
Correlation
The correlation between IDP6.L and RS2G.L is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 7, 2014 | 0.79 |
The correlation between IDP6.L and RS2G.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.79 (all time) to 0.92 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IDP6.L vs. RS2G.L — Risk / Return Rank
IDP6.L
RS2G.L
IDP6.L vs. RS2G.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P Small Cap 600 UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (IDP6.L) and Amundi Russell 2000 UCITS ETF USD (RS2G.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IDP6.L | RS2G.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.02 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.04 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.30 | +0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.46 | 3.04 | +0.42 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.01 | 9.90 | +1.10 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IDP6.L vs. RS2G.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IDP6.L drawdown since its inception was -52.21%, roughly equal to the maximum RS2G.L drawdown of -54.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IDP6.L and RS2G.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IDP6.L | RS2G.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -52.21% | -54.83% | +2.62% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.66% | -10.75% | +2.09% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.99% | -28.67% | -0.32% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.99% | -32.25% | +3.26% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.49% | -54.83% | +9.34% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.26% | -2.56% | +0.30% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.38% | -16.46% | +7.08% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.73% | 3.31% | -0.58% |
Volatility
IDP6.L vs. RS2G.L - Volatility Comparison
iShares S&P Small Cap 600 UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (IDP6.L) and Amundi Russell 2000 UCITS ETF USD (RS2G.L) have volatilities of 4.52% and 4.62%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IDP6.L | RS2G.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.52% | 4.62% | -0.10% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.13% | 13.48% | -1.35% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.87% | 18.19% | -1.32% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.13% | 25.09% | -3.96% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.67% | 25.86% | -4.19% |
IDP6.L vs. RS2G.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
IDP6.L has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than RS2G.L's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
IDP6.L vs. RS2G.L - Dividend Comparison
IDP6.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.52%, while RS2G.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IDP6.L iShares S&P Small Cap 600 UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | 0.52% | 1.16% | 1.18% | 1.07% | 1.06% | 0.66% | 0.88% | 0.94% | 1.01% | 0.72% | 0.87% | 0.56% |
RS2G.L Amundi Russell 2000 UCITS ETF USD | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IDP6.L and RS2G.L have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IDP6.L is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IDP6.L is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for RS2G.L.
IDP6.L tracks S&P 600 Small Cap Index (NET), while RS2G.L tracks Russell 2000 TR USD. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for IDP6.L and 0.35% for RS2G.L.
Find the right allocation for IDP6.L and RS2G.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer