PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IDMO vs. NTSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IDMO vs. NTSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P International Developed Momentum ETF (IDMO) and WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund (NTSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IDMO achieves a 8.17% return, which is significantly higher than NTSX's 7.28% return.


IDMO

1D
1.36%
1M
-1.92%
YTD
8.17%
6M
10.09%
1Y
23.12%
3Y*
25.21%
5Y*
15.50%
10Y*
12.64%

NTSX

1D
0.53%
1M
-0.04%
YTD
7.28%
6M
7.49%
1Y
22.10%
3Y*
18.55%
5Y*
9.23%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IDMO vs. NTSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
IDMO
Invesco S&P International Developed Momentum ETF
8.17%42.17%12.79%20.16%-12.03%14.31%22.01%26.09%-15.23%
NTSX
WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund
7.28%18.82%20.20%22.70%-25.84%22.21%24.87%32.03%-7.87%

Correlation

The correlation between IDMO and NTSX is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.72

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.67

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.68

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 2, 2018

0.68

The correlation between IDMO and NTSX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.67 to 0.72 - a consistent structural relationship.

IDMO vs. NTSX - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IDMO
NTSX

Financial Services

42.4%
12.3%

Industrials

22.6%
7.7%

Basic Materials

10.2%
1.4%

Utilities

8.4%
2.1%

Technology

5.3%
35.1%

Consumer Defensive

2.5%
5.5%

Communication Services

2.2%
12.5%

Real Estate

2.0%
1.5%

Energy

1.9%
3.5%

Consumer Cyclical

1.4%
10.1%

Healthcare

1.2%
8.4%

Financial Services

IDMO
42.4%
NTSX
12.3%

Industrials

IDMO
22.6%
NTSX
7.7%

Basic Materials

IDMO
10.2%
NTSX
1.4%

Utilities

IDMO
8.4%
NTSX
2.1%

Technology

IDMO
5.3%
NTSX
35.1%

Consumer Defensive

IDMO
2.5%
NTSX
5.5%

Communication Services

IDMO
2.2%
NTSX
12.5%

Real Estate

IDMO
2.0%
NTSX
1.5%

Energy

IDMO
1.9%
NTSX
3.5%

Consumer Cyclical

IDMO
1.4%
NTSX
10.1%

Healthcare

IDMO
1.2%
NTSX
8.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IDMO vs. NTSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IDMO
IDMO Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
IDMO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IDMO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
IDMO Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
IDMO Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
IDMO Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank

NTSX
NTSX Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
NTSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NTSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
NTSX Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
NTSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
NTSX Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IDMO vs. NTSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P International Developed Momentum ETF (IDMO) and WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund (NTSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IDMONTSXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.42

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.41

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.31

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.89

2.42

-0.54

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.64

10.43

-2.79

IDMO vs. NTSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IDMO Sharpe Ratio is 1.30, which is comparable to the NTSX Sharpe Ratio of 1.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IDMO and NTSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IDMO vs. NTSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IDMO drawdown since its inception was -39.38%, which is greater than NTSX's maximum drawdown of -31.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IDMO and NTSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IDMONTSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.38%

-31.34%

-8.04%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.31%

-9.16%

-3.15%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.65%

-16.82%

+4.17%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.07%

-31.34%

+4.27%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.34%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.92%

-2.27%

+0.35%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.74%

-6.78%

-2.96%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.04%

2.13%

+0.91%

Volatility

IDMO vs. NTSX - Volatility Comparison

Invesco S&P International Developed Momentum ETF (IDMO) has a higher volatility of 7.92% compared to WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund (NTSX) at 5.05%. This indicates that IDMO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NTSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IDMONTSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.92%

5.05%

+2.87%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.02%

10.34%

+5.68%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.92%

12.92%

+5.00%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.03%

17.13%

+0.90%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.18%

18.30%

-0.12%

IDMO vs. NTSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

IDMO has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than NTSX's 0.20% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

IDMO vs. NTSX - Dividend Comparison

IDMO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.52%, more than NTSX's 1.09% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IDMO
Invesco S&P International Developed Momentum ETF
3.52%3.71%2.24%2.89%3.66%1.81%1.63%2.78%3.27%3.08%2.18%2.52%
NTSX
WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund
1.09%1.14%1.14%1.21%1.36%0.82%0.92%1.42%0.62%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


IDMO and NTSX have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IDMO has higher volatility (7.92%) compared to NTSX (5.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IDMO dropped -39.38% vs NTSX's -31.34%.

On 5-year performance, IDMO leads with 15.50% vs 9.23% for NTSX. On fees, NTSX is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, NTSX has been the lower-risk option at 5.05%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, IDMO has performed better with a 15.50% return vs 9.23%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

NTSX is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for IDMO.

IDMO has the higher dividend yield at 3.52%, compared with 1.09% for NTSX.

IDMO is categorized as Momentum, while NTSX is Diversified Portfolio. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for IDMO and 0.20% for NTSX.

NTSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.72 vs 1.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IDMO and NTSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer