IDMO vs. GLD
IDMO (Invesco S&P International Developed Momentum ETF) and GLD (SPDR Gold Shares) are both exchange-traded funds - IDMO is a Momentum fund tracking the S&P Momentum Developed ex U.S. & South Korea LargeMidCap Index, while GLD is a Gold fund tracking the LBMA Gold Price PM. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IDMO returned 12.64%/yr vs 12.15%/yr for GLD. At a 0.15 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. IDMO charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for GLD.
Performance
IDMO vs. GLD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IDMO achieves a 8.17% return, which is significantly higher than GLD's -2.47% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with IDMO having a 12.64% annualized return and GLD not far behind at 12.15%.
IDMO
- 1D
- 1.36%
- 1M
- -1.92%
- YTD
- 8.17%
- 6M
- 10.09%
- 1Y
- 23.12%
- 3Y*
- 25.21%
- 5Y*
- 15.50%
- 10Y*
- 12.64%
GLD
- 1D
- 0.06%
- 1M
- -10.21%
- YTD
- -2.47%
- 6M
- -2.25%
- 1Y
- 23.81%
- 3Y*
- 28.89%
- 5Y*
- 17.08%
- 10Y*
- 12.15%
IDMO vs. GLD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IDMO Invesco S&P International Developed Momentum ETF | 8.17% | 42.17% | 12.79% | 20.16% | -12.03% | 14.31% | 22.01% | 26.09% | -16.66% | 29.21% |
GLD SPDR Gold Shares | -2.47% | 63.68% | 26.66% | 12.69% | -0.77% | -4.15% | 24.81% | 17.86% | -1.94% | 12.81% |
Correlation
The correlation between IDMO and GLD is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 24, 2012 | 0.15 |
Over the past year, IDMO and GLD have become more correlated (0.39) than their long-term average of 0.15, meaning their price movements have been converging.
IDMO vs. GLD - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IDMO
GLD
Financial Services
-
Industrials
-
Basic Materials
Utilities
-
Technology
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Communication Services
-
Real Estate
-
Energy
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Healthcare
-
Financial Services
IDMO
GLD
-
Industrials
IDMO
GLD
-
Basic Materials
IDMO
GLD
Utilities
IDMO
GLD
-
Technology
IDMO
GLD
-
Consumer Defensive
IDMO
GLD
-
Communication Services
IDMO
GLD
-
Real Estate
IDMO
GLD
-
Energy
IDMO
GLD
-
Consumer Cyclical
IDMO
GLD
-
Healthcare
IDMO
GLD
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IDMO vs. GLD — Risk / Return Rank
IDMO
GLD
IDMO vs. GLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P International Developed Momentum ETF (IDMO) and SPDR Gold Shares (GLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IDMO | GLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.42 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.69 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.18 | +0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.89 | 0.98 | +0.91 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.64 | 2.81 | +4.83 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IDMO vs. GLD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IDMO drawdown since its inception was -39.38%, smaller than the maximum GLD drawdown of -45.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IDMO and GLD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IDMO | GLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -39.38% | -45.56% | +6.18% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.31% | -24.46% | +12.15% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.65% | -24.46% | +11.81% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.07% | -24.46% | -2.61% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -31.34% | -24.46% | -6.88% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.92% | -22.05% | +20.13% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.74% | -16.16% | +6.42% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.04% | 8.49% | -5.45% |
Volatility
IDMO vs. GLD - Volatility Comparison
Invesco S&P International Developed Momentum ETF (IDMO) and SPDR Gold Shares (GLD) have volatilities of 7.92% and 7.79%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IDMO | GLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.92% | 7.79% | +0.13% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.02% | 24.10% | -8.08% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.92% | 27.37% | -9.45% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.03% | 18.22% | -0.19% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.18% | 16.08% | +2.10% |
IDMO vs. GLD - Expense Ratio Comparison
IDMO has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than GLD's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
IDMO vs. GLD - Dividend Comparison
IDMO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.52%, while GLD has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GLD SPDR Gold Shares | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IDMO Invesco S&P International Developed Momentum ETF | 3.52% | 3.71% | 2.24% | 2.89% | 3.66% | 1.81% | 1.63% | 2.78% | 3.27% | 3.08% | 2.18% | 2.52% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IDMO and GLD have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IDMO has higher volatility (7.92%) compared to GLD (7.79%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IDMO dropped -39.38% vs GLD's -45.56%.
On 10-year performance, IDMO leads with 12.64% vs 12.15% for GLD. On fees, IDMO is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, GLD has been the lower-risk option at 7.79%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, IDMO has performed better with a 12.64% return vs 12.15%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IDMO is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for GLD.
IDMO has the higher dividend yield at 3.52%, compared with 0.00% for GLD.
IDMO is categorized as Momentum, while GLD is Gold. IDMO tracks S&P Momentum Developed ex U.S. & South Korea LargeMidCap Index, while GLD tracks LBMA Gold Price PM. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for IDMO and 0.40% for GLD.
IDMO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.30 vs 0.87), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IDMO and GLD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer