PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IDMO vs. FDVV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IDMO vs. FDVV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P International Developed Momentum ETF (IDMO) and Fidelity High Dividend ETF (FDVV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IDMO achieves a 8.17% return, which is significantly lower than FDVV's 9.30% return.


IDMO

1D
1.36%
1M
-1.92%
YTD
8.17%
6M
10.09%
1Y
23.12%
3Y*
25.21%
5Y*
15.50%
10Y*
12.64%

FDVV

1D
0.57%
1M
3.47%
YTD
9.30%
6M
9.44%
1Y
22.58%
3Y*
19.75%
5Y*
13.53%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IDMO vs. FDVV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IDMO
Invesco S&P International Developed Momentum ETF
8.17%42.17%12.79%20.16%-12.03%14.31%22.01%26.09%-16.66%29.21%
FDVV
Fidelity High Dividend ETF
9.30%17.08%21.81%18.00%-4.21%29.24%2.80%24.07%-1.26%14.00%

Correlation

The correlation between IDMO and FDVV is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.67

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.67

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.73

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 15, 2016

0.59

The correlation between IDMO and FDVV shifts across timeframes, from 0.59 (all time) to 0.73 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

IDMO vs. FDVV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IDMO
FDVV

Financial Services

42.4%
17.0%

Industrials

22.6%
3.4%

Basic Materials

10.2%

-

Utilities

8.4%
8.7%

Technology

5.3%
29.1%

Consumer Defensive

2.5%
11.0%

Communication Services

2.2%
3.7%

Real Estate

2.0%
10.1%

Energy

1.9%

-

Consumer Cyclical

1.4%
13.6%

Healthcare

1.2%
3.1%

Financial Services

IDMO
42.4%
FDVV
17.0%

Industrials

IDMO
22.6%
FDVV
3.4%

Basic Materials

IDMO
10.2%
FDVV

-

Utilities

IDMO
8.4%
FDVV
8.7%

Technology

IDMO
5.3%
FDVV
29.1%

Consumer Defensive

IDMO
2.5%
FDVV
11.0%

Communication Services

IDMO
2.2%
FDVV
3.7%

Real Estate

IDMO
2.0%
FDVV
10.1%

Energy

IDMO
1.9%
FDVV

-

Consumer Cyclical

IDMO
1.4%
FDVV
13.6%

Healthcare

IDMO
1.2%
FDVV
3.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IDMO vs. FDVV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IDMO
IDMO Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
IDMO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IDMO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
IDMO Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
IDMO Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
IDMO Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank

FDVV
FDVV Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
FDVV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDVV Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDVV Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
FDVV Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDVV Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IDMO vs. FDVV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P International Developed Momentum ETF (IDMO) and Fidelity High Dividend ETF (FDVV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IDMOFDVVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.95

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.21

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.41

-0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.89

2.44

-0.55

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.64

10.11

-2.47

IDMO vs. FDVV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IDMO Sharpe Ratio is 1.30, which is lower than the FDVV Sharpe Ratio of 2.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IDMO and FDVV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IDMO vs. FDVV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IDMO drawdown since its inception was -39.38%, roughly equal to the maximum FDVV drawdown of -40.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IDMO and FDVV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IDMOFDVVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.38%

-40.25%

+0.87%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.31%

-9.30%

-3.01%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.65%

-15.90%

+3.25%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.07%

-20.18%

-6.89%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.34%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.92%

-0.29%

-1.63%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.74%

-3.80%

-5.94%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.04%

2.24%

+0.80%

Volatility

IDMO vs. FDVV - Volatility Comparison

Invesco S&P International Developed Momentum ETF (IDMO) has a higher volatility of 7.92% compared to Fidelity High Dividend ETF (FDVV) at 3.16%. This indicates that IDMO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FDVV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IDMOFDVVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.92%

3.16%

+4.76%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.02%

8.16%

+7.86%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.92%

10.12%

+7.80%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.03%

14.76%

+3.27%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.18%

16.98%

+1.20%

IDMO vs. FDVV - Expense Ratio Comparison

IDMO has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than FDVV's 0.29% expense ratio.


Dividends

IDMO vs. FDVV - Dividend Comparison

IDMO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.52%, more than FDVV's 2.70% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FDVV
Fidelity High Dividend ETF
2.70%2.89%2.94%3.77%3.44%2.70%3.19%3.93%4.05%3.66%1.04%0.00%
IDMO
Invesco S&P International Developed Momentum ETF
3.52%3.71%2.24%2.89%3.66%1.81%1.63%2.78%3.27%3.08%2.18%2.52%

Frequently Asked Questions


IDMO and FDVV have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IDMO has higher volatility (7.92%) compared to FDVV (3.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IDMO dropped -39.38% vs FDVV's -40.25%.

On 5-year performance, IDMO leads with 15.50% vs 13.53% for FDVV. On fees, IDMO is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, FDVV has been the lower-risk option at 3.16%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, IDMO has performed better with a 15.50% return vs 13.53%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IDMO is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for FDVV.

IDMO has the higher dividend yield at 3.52%, compared with 2.70% for FDVV.

IDMO is categorized as Momentum, while FDVV is Large Cap Blend Equities. IDMO tracks S&P Momentum Developed ex U.S. & South Korea LargeMidCap Index, while FDVV tracks Fidelity Core Dividend Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for IDMO and 0.29% for FDVV.

FDVV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.24 vs 1.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IDMO and FDVV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer