PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IDMO vs. DBC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IDMO vs. DBC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P International Developed Momentum ETF (IDMO) and Invesco DB Commodity Index Tracking Fund (DBC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IDMO achieves a 8.17% return, which is significantly lower than DBC's 27.68% return. Over the past 10 years, IDMO has outperformed DBC with an annualized return of 12.64%, while DBC has yielded a comparatively lower 8.27% annualized return.


IDMO

1D
1.36%
1M
-1.92%
YTD
8.17%
6M
10.09%
1Y
23.12%
3Y*
25.21%
5Y*
15.50%
10Y*
12.64%

DBC

1D
-1.04%
1M
-8.99%
YTD
27.68%
6M
28.76%
1Y
34.32%
3Y*
12.92%
5Y*
11.29%
10Y*
8.27%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IDMO vs. DBC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IDMO
Invesco S&P International Developed Momentum ETF
8.17%42.17%12.79%20.16%-12.03%14.31%22.01%26.09%-16.66%29.21%
DBC
Invesco DB Commodity Index Tracking Fund
27.68%8.10%2.18%-6.19%19.34%41.36%-7.84%11.84%-11.63%4.86%

Correlation

The correlation between IDMO and DBC is -0.18, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.18

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.06

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.21

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.24

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 24, 2012

0.22

The correlation between IDMO and DBC shifts across timeframes, from -0.18 (1 year) to 0.24 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

IDMO vs. DBC - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IDMO
DBC

Financial Services

42.4%
91.5%

Industrials

22.6%

-

Basic Materials

10.2%

-

Utilities

8.4%

-

Technology

5.3%

-

Consumer Defensive

2.5%

-

Communication Services

2.2%

-

Real Estate

2.0%

-

Energy

1.9%

-

Consumer Cyclical

1.4%

-

Healthcare

1.2%

-

Financial Services

IDMO
42.4%
DBC
91.5%

Industrials

IDMO
22.6%
DBC

-

Basic Materials

IDMO
10.2%
DBC

-

Utilities

IDMO
8.4%
DBC

-

Technology

IDMO
5.3%
DBC

-

Consumer Defensive

IDMO
2.5%
DBC

-

Communication Services

IDMO
2.2%
DBC

-

Real Estate

IDMO
2.0%
DBC

-

Energy

IDMO
1.9%
DBC

-

Consumer Cyclical

IDMO
1.4%
DBC

-

Healthcare

IDMO
1.2%
DBC

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IDMO vs. DBC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IDMO
IDMO Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
IDMO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IDMO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
IDMO Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
IDMO Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
IDMO Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank

DBC
DBC Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
DBC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DBC Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
DBC Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
DBC Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
DBC Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IDMO vs. DBC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P International Developed Momentum ETF (IDMO) and Invesco DB Commodity Index Tracking Fund (DBC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IDMODBCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.52

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.49

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.32

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.89

3.48

-1.59

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.64

9.64

-2.00

IDMO vs. DBC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IDMO Sharpe Ratio is 1.30, which is comparable to the DBC Sharpe Ratio of 1.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IDMO and DBC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IDMO vs. DBC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IDMO drawdown since its inception was -39.38%, smaller than the maximum DBC drawdown of -76.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IDMO and DBC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IDMODBCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.38%

-76.36%

+36.98%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.31%

-9.91%

-2.40%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.65%

-13.82%

+1.17%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.07%

-27.34%

+0.27%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.34%

-41.71%

+10.37%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.92%

-26.14%

+24.22%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.74%

-46.19%

+36.45%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.04%

3.57%

-0.53%

Volatility

IDMO vs. DBC - Volatility Comparison

Invesco S&P International Developed Momentum ETF (IDMO) has a higher volatility of 7.92% compared to Invesco DB Commodity Index Tracking Fund (DBC) at 5.20%. This indicates that IDMO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DBC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IDMODBCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.92%

5.20%

+2.72%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.02%

16.11%

-0.09%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.92%

18.94%

-1.02%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.03%

19.22%

-1.19%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.18%

17.82%

+0.36%

IDMO vs. DBC - Expense Ratio Comparison

IDMO has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than DBC's 0.85% expense ratio.


Dividends

IDMO vs. DBC - Dividend Comparison

IDMO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.52%, more than DBC's 2.61% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DBC
Invesco DB Commodity Index Tracking Fund
2.61%3.33%5.22%4.94%0.59%0.00%0.00%1.59%1.30%0.00%0.00%0.00%
IDMO
Invesco S&P International Developed Momentum ETF
3.52%3.71%2.24%2.89%3.66%1.81%1.63%2.78%3.27%3.08%2.18%2.52%

Frequently Asked Questions


IDMO and DBC have a correlation of -0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IDMO has higher volatility (7.92%) compared to DBC (5.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IDMO dropped -39.38% vs DBC's -76.36%.

On 10-year performance, IDMO leads with 12.64% vs 8.27% for DBC. On fees, IDMO is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, DBC has been the lower-risk option at 5.20%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, IDMO has performed better with a 12.64% return vs 8.27%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IDMO is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for DBC.

IDMO has the higher dividend yield at 3.52%, compared with 2.61% for DBC.

IDMO is categorized as Momentum, while DBC is Commodities. IDMO tracks S&P Momentum Developed ex U.S. & South Korea LargeMidCap Index, while DBC tracks DBIQ Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Index Excess Return. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for IDMO and 0.85% for DBC.

DBC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.82 vs 1.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IDMO and DBC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer