IDMO vs. CMBS
IDMO (Invesco S&P International Developed Momentum ETF) and CMBS (iShares CMBS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IDMO is a Momentum fund tracking the S&P Momentum Developed ex U.S. & South Korea LargeMidCap Index, while CMBS is a Mortgage Backed Securities fund tracking the Barclays Capital U.S. CMBS (ERISA Only) Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IDMO returned 12.64%/yr vs 2.00%/yr for CMBS. At a 0.00 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.25% expense ratio.
Performance
IDMO vs. CMBS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IDMO achieves a 8.17% return, which is significantly higher than CMBS's 0.25% return. Over the past 10 years, IDMO has outperformed CMBS with an annualized return of 12.64%, while CMBS has yielded a comparatively lower 2.00% annualized return.
IDMO
- 1D
- 1.36%
- 1M
- -0.98%
- YTD
- 8.17%
- 6M
- 10.09%
- 1Y
- 24.72%
- 3Y*
- 25.21%
- 5Y*
- 15.50%
- 10Y*
- 12.64%
CMBS
- 1D
- -0.23%
- 1M
- 0.07%
- YTD
- 0.25%
- 6M
- 0.56%
- 1Y
- 4.12%
- 3Y*
- 5.34%
- 5Y*
- 0.70%
- 10Y*
- 2.00%
IDMO vs. CMBS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IDMO Invesco S&P International Developed Momentum ETF | 8.17% | 42.17% | 12.79% | 20.16% | -12.03% | 14.31% | 22.01% | 26.09% | -16.66% | 29.21% |
CMBS iShares CMBS ETF | 0.25% | 7.67% | 4.27% | 5.06% | -11.21% | -1.82% | 7.86% | 7.94% | 0.77% | 2.95% |
Correlation
The correlation between IDMO and CMBS is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.08 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.03 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 24, 2012 | 0.00 |
The correlation between IDMO and CMBS shifts across timeframes, from 0.00 (all time) to 0.18 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IDMO vs. CMBS — Risk / Return Rank
IDMO
CMBS
IDMO vs. CMBS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P International Developed Momentum ETF (IDMO) and iShares CMBS ETF (CMBS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IDMO | CMBS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.18 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.19 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.20 | +0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.89 | 1.67 | +0.21 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.64 | 4.46 | +3.18 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IDMO vs. CMBS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IDMO drawdown since its inception was -39.38%, which is greater than CMBS's maximum drawdown of -15.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IDMO and CMBS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IDMO | CMBS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -39.38% | -15.87% | -23.51% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.31% | -2.44% | -9.87% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.65% | -3.29% | -9.36% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.07% | -15.87% | -11.20% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -31.34% | -15.87% | -15.47% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.92% | -1.67% | -0.25% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.74% | -2.95% | -6.79% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.04% | 0.91% | +2.13% |
Volatility
IDMO vs. CMBS - Volatility Comparison
Invesco S&P International Developed Momentum ETF (IDMO) has a higher volatility of 7.92% compared to iShares CMBS ETF (CMBS) at 1.10%. This indicates that IDMO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CMBS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IDMO | CMBS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.92% | 1.10% | +6.82% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.02% | 2.81% | +13.21% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.92% | 3.64% | +14.28% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.03% | 5.31% | +12.72% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.18% | 5.77% | +12.41% |
IDMO vs. CMBS - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both IDMO and CMBS have an expense ratio of 0.25%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
IDMO vs. CMBS - Dividend Comparison
IDMO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.52%, less than CMBS's 3.58% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CMBS iShares CMBS ETF | 3.58% | 3.45% | 3.31% | 2.97% | 2.65% | 2.46% | 2.83% | 2.74% | 2.70% | 2.50% | 2.29% | 2.31% |
IDMO Invesco S&P International Developed Momentum ETF | 3.52% | 3.71% | 2.24% | 2.89% | 3.66% | 1.81% | 1.63% | 2.78% | 3.27% | 3.08% | 2.18% | 2.52% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IDMO and CMBS have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IDMO has higher volatility (7.92%) compared to CMBS (1.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IDMO dropped -39.38% vs CMBS's -15.87%.
On 10-year performance, IDMO leads with 12.64% vs 2.00% for CMBS. Both ETFs have the same 0.25% expense ratio. On volatility, CMBS has been the lower-risk option at 1.10%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, IDMO has performed better with a 12.64% return vs 2.00%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IDMO and CMBS have the same expense ratio: 0.25% per year.
CMBS has the higher dividend yield at 3.58%, compared with 3.52% for IDMO.
IDMO is categorized as Momentum, while CMBS is Mortgage Backed Securities. IDMO tracks S&P Momentum Developed ex U.S. & South Korea LargeMidCap Index, while CMBS tracks Barclays Capital U.S. CMBS (ERISA Only) Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and iShares.
IDMO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.30 vs 1.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IDMO and CMBS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer