IDME vs. JANB
IDME (Aptus International Drawdown Managed Equity ETF) and JANB (Aptus January Buffer ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IDME is a Global Equities fund actively managed by Aptus Capital Advisors, while JANB is a Defined Outcome fund actively managed by Aptus Capital Advisors. Both are actively managed. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IDME charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for JANB.
Performance
IDME vs. JANB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IDME achieves a 14.34% return, which is significantly higher than JANB's 5.32% return.
IDME
- 1D
- -2.69%
- 1M
- 0.48%
- YTD
- 14.34%
- 6M
- 14.11%
- 1Y
- 31.78%
- 3Y*
- 17.49%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
JANB
- 1D
- -0.50%
- 1M
- -0.15%
- YTD
- 5.32%
- 6M
- 5.27%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IDME vs. JANB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
IDME Aptus International Drawdown Managed Equity ETF | 14.34% | 5.31% |
JANB Aptus January Buffer ETF | 5.32% | 2.76% |
Correlation
The correlation between IDME and JANB is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 14, 2025 | 0.78 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IDME vs. JANB — Risk / Return Rank
IDME
JANB
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
IDME vs. JANB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Aptus International Drawdown Managed Equity ETF (IDME) and Aptus January Buffer ETF (JANB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IDME | JANB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.79 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.92 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IDME vs. JANB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IDME drawdown since its inception was -29.20%, which is greater than JANB's maximum drawdown of -6.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IDME and JANB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IDME | JANB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -29.20% | -6.52% | -22.68% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.46% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.88% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.69% | -0.97% | -1.72% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.06% | -1.10% | -9.96% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.92% | — | — |
Volatility
IDME vs. JANB - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IDME | JANB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.55% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.22% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.44% | 7.51% | +8.93% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.80% | 7.51% | +7.29% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.80% | 7.51% | +7.29% |
IDME vs. JANB - Expense Ratio Comparison
IDME has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than JANB's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
IDME vs. JANB - Dividend Comparison
IDME's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.06%, while JANB has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IDME Aptus International Drawdown Managed Equity ETF | 5.06% | 4.90% | 5.64% | 3.71% | 2.62% | 1.38% |
JANB Aptus January Buffer ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IDME and JANB have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, JANB is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
JANB is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for IDME.
IDME has the higher dividend yield at 5.06%, compared with 0.00% for JANB.
IDME is categorized as Global Equities, while JANB is Defined Outcome. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for IDME and 0.25% for JANB.
Find the right allocation for IDME and JANB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer