IDME vs. DFUS
IDME (Aptus International Drawdown Managed Equity ETF) and DFUS (Dimensional U.S. Equity Market ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IDME is a Global Equities fund actively managed by Aptus Capital Advisors, while DFUS is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Dimensional. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, IDME returned 18.02%/yr vs 22.42%/yr for DFUS. A 0.72 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IDME charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for DFUS.
Performance
IDME vs. DFUS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IDME achieves a 16.05% return, which is significantly higher than DFUS's 11.25% return.
IDME
- 1D
- -0.99%
- 1M
- 4.97%
- YTD
- 16.05%
- 6M
- 18.64%
- 1Y
- 33.98%
- 3Y*
- 18.02%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DFUS
- 1D
- -0.66%
- 1M
- 5.24%
- YTD
- 11.25%
- 6M
- 11.19%
- 1Y
- 28.63%
- 3Y*
- 22.42%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IDME vs. DFUS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IDME Aptus International Drawdown Managed Equity ETF | 16.05% | 27.53% | 6.12% | 9.07% | -19.79% | -1.25% |
DFUS Dimensional U.S. Equity Market ETF | 11.25% | 17.46% | 24.34% | 26.36% | -18.34% | 7.81% |
Correlation
The correlation between IDME and DFUS is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 26, 2021 | 0.72 |
The correlation between IDME and DFUS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.71 to 0.77 - a consistent structural relationship.
IDME vs. DFUS - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IDME
DFUS
Financial Services
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Technology
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Energy
Communication Services
Real Estate
Utilities
Financial Services
IDME
DFUS
Industrials
IDME
DFUS
Consumer Cyclical
IDME
DFUS
Technology
IDME
DFUS
Healthcare
IDME
DFUS
Consumer Defensive
IDME
DFUS
Basic Materials
IDME
DFUS
Energy
IDME
DFUS
Communication Services
IDME
DFUS
Real Estate
IDME
DFUS
Utilities
IDME
DFUS
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IDME vs. DFUS — Risk / Return Rank
IDME
DFUS
IDME vs. DFUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Aptus International Drawdown Managed Equity ETF (IDME) and Dimensional U.S. Equity Market ETF (DFUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IDME | DFUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.15 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.14 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.40 | 1.42 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.98 | 3.21 | -0.23 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.87 | 14.70 | -2.83 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IDME | DFUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.21 | 2.35 | -0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.44 | 0.79 | -0.34 |
Drawdowns
IDME vs. DFUS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IDME drawdown since its inception was -29.20%, which is greater than DFUS's maximum drawdown of -24.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IDME and DFUS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IDME | DFUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -29.20% | -24.62% | -4.58% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.46% | -8.96% | -2.50% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.88% | -19.44% | +6.56% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.99% | -0.66% | -0.33% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.17% | -5.82% | -5.35% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.87% | 1.95% | +0.92% |
Volatility
IDME vs. DFUS - Volatility Comparison
Aptus International Drawdown Managed Equity ETF (IDME) has a higher volatility of 5.23% compared to Dimensional U.S. Equity Market ETF (DFUS) at 3.07%. This indicates that IDME's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DFUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IDME | DFUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.23% | 3.07% | +2.16% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.95% | 9.18% | +3.77% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.48% | 12.23% | +3.25% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.64% | 17.21% | -2.57% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.64% | 17.21% | -2.57% |
IDME vs. DFUS - Expense Ratio Comparison
IDME has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than DFUS's 0.09% expense ratio.
Dividends
IDME vs. DFUS - Dividend Comparison
IDME's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.98%, more than DFUS's 0.83% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DFUS Dimensional U.S. Equity Market ETF | 0.83% | 0.88% | 1.04% | 1.33% | 1.48% | 0.85% |
IDME Aptus International Drawdown Managed Equity ETF | 4.98% | 4.90% | 5.64% | 3.71% | 2.62% | 1.38% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IDME and DFUS have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IDME has higher volatility (5.23%) compared to DFUS (3.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IDME dropped -29.20% vs DFUS's -24.62%.
On 3-year performance, DFUS leads with 22.42% vs 18.02% for IDME. On fees, DFUS is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, DFUS has been the lower-risk option at 3.07%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, DFUS has performed better with a 22.42% return vs 18.02%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DFUS is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for IDME.
IDME has the higher dividend yield at 4.98%, compared with 0.83% for DFUS.
IDME is categorized as Global Equities, while DFUS is Large Cap Blend Equities. They also come from different issuers: Aptus Capital Advisors and Dimensional. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for IDME and 0.09% for DFUS.
DFUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.35 vs 2.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IDME and DFUS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer