PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IDME vs. DBE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IDME vs. DBE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Aptus International Drawdown Managed Equity ETF (IDME) and Invesco DB Energy Fund (DBE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IDME achieves a 16.05% return, which is significantly lower than DBE's 83.68% return.


IDME

1D
-0.99%
1M
4.97%
YTD
16.05%
6M
18.64%
1Y
33.98%
3Y*
18.02%
5Y*
10Y*

DBE

1D
2.33%
1M
-5.45%
YTD
83.68%
6M
74.95%
1Y
84.41%
3Y*
23.42%
5Y*
19.66%
10Y*
12.03%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IDME vs. DBE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
IDME
Aptus International Drawdown Managed Equity ETF
16.05%27.53%6.12%9.07%-19.79%-1.25%
DBE
Invesco DB Energy Fund
83.68%-2.17%2.96%-12.14%33.77%9.42%

Correlation

The correlation between IDME and DBE is -0.39, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.39

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.07

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 26, 2021

0.09

The correlation between IDME and DBE shifts across timeframes, from -0.39 (1 year) to 0.09 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IDME vs. DBE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IDME
IDME Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
IDME Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IDME Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
IDME Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
IDME Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
IDME Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank

DBE
DBE Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
DBE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DBE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
DBE Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
DBE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
DBE Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IDME vs. DBE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Aptus International Drawdown Managed Equity ETF (IDME) and Invesco DB Energy Fund (DBE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IDMEDBEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.22

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.12

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.40

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.98

5.89

-2.91

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.87

11.53

+0.34

IDME vs. DBE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IDME Sharpe Ratio is 2.21, which is comparable to the DBE Sharpe Ratio of 2.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IDME and DBE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IDMEDBEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.21

2.43

-0.22

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.67

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.43

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.44

0.09

+0.35

Drawdowns

IDME vs. DBE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IDME drawdown since its inception was -29.20%, smaller than the maximum DBE drawdown of -86.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IDME and DBE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IDMEDBEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-29.20%

-86.69%

+57.49%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.46%

-14.41%

+2.95%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.88%

-23.89%

+11.01%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.74%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-60.84%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.99%

-30.27%

+29.28%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.17%

-57.31%

+46.14%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.87%

7.35%

-4.48%

Volatility

IDME vs. DBE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Aptus International Drawdown Managed Equity ETF (IDME) is 5.23%, while Invesco DB Energy Fund (DBE) has a volatility of 12.95%. This indicates that IDME experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DBE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IDMEDBEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.23%

12.95%

-7.72%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.95%

30.86%

-17.91%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.48%

34.97%

-19.49%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.64%

29.39%

-14.75%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.64%

28.33%

-13.69%

IDME vs. DBE - Expense Ratio Comparison

IDME has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than DBE's 0.78% expense ratio.


Dividends

IDME vs. DBE - Dividend Comparison

IDME's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.98%, more than DBE's 2.10% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
DBE
Invesco DB Energy Fund
2.10%3.86%6.32%3.87%0.75%0.00%0.00%1.79%1.67%
IDME
Aptus International Drawdown Managed Equity ETF
4.98%4.90%5.64%3.71%2.62%1.38%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


IDME and DBE have a correlation of -0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DBE has higher volatility (12.95%) compared to IDME (5.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IDME dropped -29.20% vs DBE's -86.69%.

On 3-year performance, DBE leads with 23.42% vs 18.02% for IDME. On fees, IDME is cheaper at 0.65% per year. On volatility, IDME has been the lower-risk option at 5.23%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, DBE has performed better with a 23.42% return vs 18.02%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IDME is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.78% for DBE.

IDME has the higher dividend yield at 4.98%, compared with 2.10% for DBE.

IDME is categorized as Global Equities, while DBE is Oil & Gas. They also come from different issuers: Aptus Capital Advisors and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for IDME and 0.78% for DBE.

DBE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.43 vs 2.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IDME and DBE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer