PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
IDJG.L vs. FLXD.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

IDJG.L vs. FLXD.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

IDJG.L (iShares EURO Total Market Growth Large UCITS) and FLXD.L (Franklin European Quality Dividend UCITS ETF) are both Europe Equities funds - IDJG.L tracks the MSCI EMU NR EUR while FLXD.L tracks the MSCI Europe High Div Yld NR EUR. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, IDJG.L returned 8.89%/yr vs 13.18%/yr for FLXD.L. A 0.55 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IDJG.L charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for FLXD.L.

Performance

IDJG.L vs. FLXD.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares EURO Total Market Growth Large UCITS (IDJG.L) and Franklin European Quality Dividend UCITS ETF (FLXD.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

IDJG.L is traded in GBp, while FLXD.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the FLXD.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IDJG.L achieves a 10.35% return, which is significantly higher than FLXD.L's 9.29% return.

IDJG.L

1D
0.60%
1M
7.80%
YTD
10.35%
6M
10.07%
1Y
17.46%
3Y*
11.45%
5Y*
8.89%
10Y*
11.09%

FLXD.L

1D
0.49%
1M
-0.03%
YTD
9.29%
6M
12.43%
1Y
20.53%
3Y*
19.08%
5Y*
13.18%
10Y*
—
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IDJG.L vs. FLXD.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IDJG.L
iShares EURO Total Market Growth Large UCITS		10.35%16.31%5.06%18.23%-12.30%18.39%12.16%27.93%-10.56%1.43%
FLXD.L
Franklin European Quality Dividend UCITS ETF		9.29%31.50%8.51%9.23%6.26%10.54%1.48%13.79%-11.21%-3.30%

Correlation

The correlation between IDJG.L and FLXD.L is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.35

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.40

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.49

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 11, 2017

0.55

Over the past year, the correlation between IDJG.L and FLXD.L has dropped to 0.35 - well below their long-term average of 0.55, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

IDJG.L vs. FLXD.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
IDJG.L
FLXD.L

Industrials

33.5%
7.9%

Technology

32.9%
0.7%

Consumer Cyclical

11.9%
1.0%

Financial Services

4.9%
35.8%

Utilities

4.4%
3.1%

Healthcare

4.4%
10.3%

Basic Materials

4.3%
5.2%

Consumer Defensive

3.1%
4.6%

Communication Services

0.7%
16.3%

Energy

-

11.6%

Real Estate

-

3.5%

Industrials

IDJG.L
33.5%
FLXD.L
7.9%

Technology

IDJG.L
32.9%
FLXD.L
0.7%

Consumer Cyclical

IDJG.L
11.9%
FLXD.L
1.0%

Financial Services

IDJG.L
4.9%
FLXD.L
35.8%

Utilities

IDJG.L
4.4%
FLXD.L
3.1%

Healthcare

IDJG.L
4.4%
FLXD.L
10.3%

Basic Materials

IDJG.L
4.3%
FLXD.L
5.2%

Consumer Defensive

IDJG.L
3.1%
FLXD.L
4.6%

Communication Services

IDJG.L
0.7%
FLXD.L
16.3%

Energy

IDJG.L

-

FLXD.L
11.6%

Real Estate

IDJG.L

-

FLXD.L
3.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

iShares EURO Total Market Growth Large UCITS

Franklin European Quality Dividend UCITS ETF

Often compared with IDJG.L:
IDJG.L vs. VWRL.ASIDJG.L vs. VEUR.LIDJG.L vs. VOOIDJG.L vs. IWVG.LIDJG.L vs. URTHIDJG.L vs. VWRL.LIDJG.L vs. SMEA.L
Often compared with FLXD.L:
FLXD.L vs. TDGB.LFLXD.L vs. LDEG.LFLXD.L vs. XSTC.LFLXD.L vs. EQDS.LFLXD.L vs. S7XP.LFLXD.L vs. IDVY.LFLXD.L vs. VUAG.L

Return for Risk

IDJG.L vs. FLXD.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
IDJG.L
IDJG.L Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
IDJG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IDJG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
IDJG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
IDJG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
IDJG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank
FLXD.L
FLXD.L Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
FLXD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLXD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLXD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
FLXD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLXD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IDJG.L vs. FLXD.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares EURO Total Market Growth Large UCITS (IDJG.L) and Franklin European Quality Dividend UCITS ETF (FLXD.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

IDJG.LFLXD.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
0.99
2.40

-1.41

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
1.56
3.51

-1.95

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.43

-0.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.31

5.64

-4.33

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.45

15.75

-11.29

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

IDJG.L vs. FLXD.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IDJG.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.99, which is lower than the FLXD.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IDJG.L and FLXD.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

IDJG.LFLXD.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.99

2.40

-1.41

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.47

1.21

-0.74

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.65

—

—

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.45

0.64

-0.19

Drawdowns

IDJG.L vs. FLXD.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IDJG.L drawdown since its inception was -45.75%, which is greater than FLXD.L's maximum drawdown of -29.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IDJG.L and FLXD.L.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

IDJG.LFLXD.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-45.75%

-29.71%

-16.04%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.27%

-3.62%

-9.65%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.37%

-7.78%

-9.59%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.15%

-11.76%

-15.39%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-27.21%

—

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-2.77%

+2.77%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.90%

-4.13%

-3.77%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.91%

1.30%

+2.61%

Volatility

IDJG.L vs. FLXD.L - Volatility Comparison

iShares EURO Total Market Growth Large UCITS (IDJG.L) has a higher volatility of 6.05% compared to Franklin European Quality Dividend UCITS ETF (FLXD.L) at 2.67%. This indicates that IDJG.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLXD.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

IDJG.LFLXD.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.05%

2.67%

+3.38%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.77%

6.95%

+7.82%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.58%

8.52%

+9.06%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.20%

10.85%

+8.35%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.95%

12.91%

+6.04%

IDJG.L vs. FLXD.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

IDJG.L has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than FLXD.L's 0.25% expense ratio.

Dividends

IDJG.L vs. FLXD.L - Dividend Comparison

IDJG.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.07%, less than FLXD.L's 4.37% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FLXD.L
Franklin European Quality Dividend UCITS ETF		4.37%4.90%5.18%5.75%5.87%5.51%3.90%1.53%1.09%0.00%0.00%0.00%
IDJG.L
iShares EURO Total Market Growth Large UCITS		1.07%1.02%0.99%0.93%0.97%0.56%1.00%1.45%1.53%1.55%1.68%1.67%

Frequently Asked Questions

IDJG.L and FLXD.L have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, FLXD.L is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

FLXD.L is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for IDJG.L.

IDJG.L tracks MSCI EMU NR EUR, while FLXD.L tracks MSCI Europe High Div Yld NR EUR. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for IDJG.L and 0.25% for FLXD.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IDJG.L and FLXD.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer