PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
IDJG.L vs. CMB1.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

IDJG.L vs. CMB1.L

Last updated Jun 26, 2026

IDJG.L (iShares EURO Total Market Growth Large UCITS) and CMB1.L (iShares FTSE MIB UCITS ETF (Acc)) are both Europe Equities funds from iShares - IDJG.L tracks the MSCI EMU NR EUR while CMB1.L tracks the FTSE Italia AllShare TR EUR. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IDJG.L returned 11.50%/yr vs 17.45%/yr for CMB1.L. A 0.72 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IDJG.L charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.33%/yr for CMB1.L.

Performance

IDJG.L vs. CMB1.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares EURO Total Market Growth Large UCITS (IDJG.L) and iShares FTSE MIB UCITS ETF (Acc) (CMB1.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IDJG.L achieves a 11.64% return, which is significantly lower than CMB1.L's 16.99% return. Over the past 10 years, IDJG.L has underperformed CMB1.L with an annualized return of 11.50%, while CMB1.L has yielded a comparatively higher 17.45% annualized return.

IDJG.L

1D
0.78%
1M
3.15%
YTD
11.64%
6M
12.29%
1Y
20.98%
3Y*
12.42%
5Y*
8.46%
10Y*
11.50%

CMB1.L

1D
0.03%
1M
3.29%
YTD
16.99%
6M
17.62%
1Y
38.46%
3Y*
29.77%
5Y*
20.58%
10Y*
17.45%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IDJG.L vs. CMB1.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IDJG.L
iShares EURO Total Market Growth Large UCITS		11.64%16.31%5.06%18.23%-12.30%18.39%12.16%27.93%-10.56%17.01%
CMB1.L
iShares FTSE MIB UCITS ETF (Acc)		16.99%43.83%13.25%30.68%-3.56%18.29%1.52%24.83%-13.79%22.48%

Correlation

The correlation between IDJG.L and CMB1.L is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.69

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.72

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.73

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.73

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 26, 2010

0.72

The correlation between IDJG.L and CMB1.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.69 to 0.73 - a consistent structural relationship.

IDJG.L vs. CMB1.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
IDJG.L
CMB1.L

Technology

33.9%
6.0%

Industrials

33.5%
11.1%

Consumer Cyclical

11.9%
9.2%

Financial Services

4.6%
47.2%

Utilities

4.5%
15.3%

Healthcare

4.2%
1.1%

Basic Materials

4.0%
0.5%

Consumer Defensive

2.9%
0.4%

Communication Services

0.6%
1.8%

Energy

-

7.2%

Real Estate

-

0.3%

Technology

IDJG.L
33.9%
CMB1.L
6.0%

Industrials

IDJG.L
33.5%
CMB1.L
11.1%

Consumer Cyclical

IDJG.L
11.9%
CMB1.L
9.2%

Financial Services

IDJG.L
4.6%
CMB1.L
47.2%

Utilities

IDJG.L
4.5%
CMB1.L
15.3%

Healthcare

IDJG.L
4.2%
CMB1.L
1.1%

Basic Materials

IDJG.L
4.0%
CMB1.L
0.5%

Consumer Defensive

IDJG.L
2.9%
CMB1.L
0.4%

Communication Services

IDJG.L
0.6%
CMB1.L
1.8%

Energy

IDJG.L

-

CMB1.L
7.2%

Real Estate

IDJG.L

-

CMB1.L
0.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

iShares EURO Total Market Growth Large UCITS

iShares FTSE MIB UCITS ETF (Acc)

Often compared with IDJG.L:
IDJG.L vs. VWRL.ASIDJG.L vs. VEUR.LIDJG.L vs. VOOIDJG.L vs. IWVG.LIDJG.L vs. URTHIDJG.L vs. VWRL.LIDJG.L vs. SMEA.L
Often compared with CMB1.L:
CMB1.L vs. XDEM.LCMB1.L vs. H50E.LCMB1.L vs. IITU.LCMB1.L vs. SPYCMB1.L vs. IQSA.LCMB1.L vs. X7PP.LCMB1.L vs. EQQQ.L

Return for Risk

IDJG.L vs. CMB1.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
IDJG.L
IDJG.L Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
IDJG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IDJG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
IDJG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
IDJG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
IDJG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank
CMB1.L
CMB1.L Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
CMB1.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CMB1.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
CMB1.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
CMB1.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
CMB1.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IDJG.L vs. CMB1.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares EURO Total Market Growth Large UCITS (IDJG.L) and iShares FTSE MIB UCITS ETF (Acc) (CMB1.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

IDJG.LCMB1.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
1.16
2.54

-1.38

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
1.78
3.42

-1.64

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.44

-0.22

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.57

3.71

-2.14

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.36

13.55

-8.19

IDJG.L vs. CMB1.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IDJG.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.16, which is lower than the CMB1.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IDJG.L and CMB1.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IDJG.L vs. CMB1.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IDJG.L drawdown since its inception was -60.68%, which is greater than CMB1.L's maximum drawdown of -56.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IDJG.L and CMB1.L.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

IDJG.LCMB1.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-60.68%

-56.05%

-4.63%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.27%

-10.32%

-2.95%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.37%

-15.62%

-1.75%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.15%

-24.19%

-2.96%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-27.21%

-36.61%

+9.40%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.06%

-2.84%

-0.22%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.07%

-15.20%

-2.87%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.90%

2.83%

+1.07%

Volatility

IDJG.L vs. CMB1.L - Volatility Comparison

iShares EURO Total Market Growth Large UCITS (IDJG.L) has a higher volatility of 5.53% compared to iShares FTSE MIB UCITS ETF (Acc) (CMB1.L) at 3.96%. This indicates that IDJG.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CMB1.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

IDJG.LCMB1.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.53%

3.96%

+1.57%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.41%

12.40%

+3.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.96%

15.07%

+2.89%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.19%

18.01%

+1.18%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.30%

20.12%

-1.82%

IDJG.L vs. CMB1.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

IDJG.L has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than CMB1.L's 0.33% expense ratio.

Dividends

IDJG.L vs. CMB1.L - Dividend Comparison

IDJG.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.90%, while CMB1.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CMB1.L
iShares FTSE MIB UCITS ETF (Acc)		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
IDJG.L
iShares EURO Total Market Growth Large UCITS		0.90%1.02%0.99%0.93%0.97%0.56%1.00%1.45%1.53%1.55%1.68%1.69%

Frequently Asked Questions

IDJG.L and CMB1.L have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, CMB1.L is cheaper at 0.33% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

CMB1.L is cheaper with a 0.33% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for IDJG.L.

IDJG.L tracks MSCI EMU NR EUR, while CMB1.L tracks FTSE Italia AllShare TR EUR. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for IDJG.L and 0.33% for CMB1.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IDJG.L and CMB1.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer