PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IDEF vs. WDAF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IDEF vs. WDAF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Defense Industrials Active ETF (IDEF) and WisdomTree Asia Defense Fund (WDAF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IDEF achieves a 2.45% return, which is significantly lower than WDAF's 10.54% return.


IDEF

1D
-0.60%
1M
-3.83%
YTD
2.45%
6M
0.08%
1Y
16.11%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

WDAF

1D
-5.17%
1M
-7.02%
YTD
10.54%
6M
9.61%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IDEF vs. WDAF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
IDEF
iShares Defense Industrials Active ETF
2.45%2.02%
WDAF
WisdomTree Asia Defense Fund
10.54%-7.71%

Correlation

The correlation between IDEF and WDAF is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 12, 2025

0.61

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IDEF vs. WDAF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IDEF
IDEF Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
IDEF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IDEF Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
IDEF Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
IDEF Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
IDEF Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank

WDAF

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IDEF vs. WDAF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Defense Industrials Active ETF (IDEF) and WisdomTree Asia Defense Fund (WDAF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IDEFWDAFDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.09

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.57

IDEF vs. WDAF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IDEF vs. WDAF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IDEF drawdown since its inception was -14.78%, smaller than the maximum WDAF drawdown of -20.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IDEF and WDAF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IDEFWDAFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.78%

-20.11%

+5.33%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.78%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-14.23%

-17.04%

+2.81%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.30%

-6.70%

+2.40%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.28%

Volatility

IDEF vs. WDAF - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IDEFWDAFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.84%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.93%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.10%

32.59%

-10.49%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.57%

32.59%

-11.02%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.57%

32.59%

-11.02%

IDEF vs. WDAF - Expense Ratio Comparison

IDEF has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than WDAF's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

IDEF vs. WDAF - Dividend Comparison

IDEF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.34%, more than WDAF's 0.12% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


IDEF and WDAF have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, WDAF is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

WDAF is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for IDEF.

IDEF has the higher dividend yield at 0.34%, compared with 0.12% for WDAF.

They also come from different issuers: iShares and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for IDEF and 0.45% for WDAF.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IDEF and WDAF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer